Agricultural - Machinery
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
WNC vs HYLN vs WLFC vs GNSS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
Rental & Leasing Services
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
WNC vs HYLN vs WLFC vs GNSS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural - Machinery | Auto - Parts | Rental & Leasing Services | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $317M | $464M | $1.71B | $90M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.47B | $3M | $763M | $51M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-65M | $-57M | $121M | $-15M |
| Gross Margin | 2.0% | 4.9% | 53.9% | 43.2% |
| Operating Margin | -3.1% | -18.9% | 20.4% | -22.1% |
| Forward P/E | 1.5x | — | 16.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $443M | $4M | $2.71B | $21M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $32M | $23M | $16M | $8M |
WNC vs HYLN vs WLFC vs GNSS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wabash National Cor… (WNC) | 100 | 81.7 | -18.3% |
| Hyliion Holdings Co… (HYLN) | 100 | 24.7 | -75.3% |
| Willis Lease Financ… (WLFC) | 100 | 1069.6 | +969.6% |
| Genasys Inc. (GNSS) | 100 | 43.7 | -56.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WNC vs HYLN vs WLFC vs GNSS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.93, yield 4.2%
- Better valuation composite
- 4.2% yield, vs WLFC's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
HYLN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 130.3%, EPS growth -10.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.2%
- 130.3% revenue growth vs WNC's -20.8%
WLFC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs GNSS's 14.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.66, current ratio 3.09x
- Beta 1.66, yield 0.4%, current ratio 3.09x
- 15.8% margin vs HYLN's -16.5%
GNSS is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.87 vs HYLN's 2.39
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 130.3% revenue growth vs WNC's -20.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.8% margin vs HYLN's -16.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs HYLN's 2.39 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, vs WLFC's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +68.2% vs WNC's +0.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.2% ROA vs HYLN's -28.1%, ROIC 5.3% vs -23.7% |
WNC vs HYLN vs WLFC vs GNSS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WNC vs HYLN vs WLFC vs GNSS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WLFC leads in 2 of 6 categories
WNC leads 1 • HYLN leads 0 • GNSS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WLFC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WNC is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 421.6x HYLN's $3M. WLFC is the more profitable business, keeping 15.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HYLN's -16.5%. On growth, GNSS holds the edge at +145.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $3M | $763M | $51M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | -$60M | $273M | -$9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$65M | -$57M | $121M | -$15M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$38M | -$70M | -$277M | -$3M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | +4.9% | +53.9% | +43.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.1% | -18.9% | +20.4% | -22.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | -16.5% | +15.8% | -29.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | -20.2% | -36.2% | -5.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.4% | -52.8% | +23.2% | +145.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -120.7% | +12.5% | +57.9% | +78.0% |
Valuation Metrics
WNC leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.5x trailing earnings, WNC trades at a 89% valuation discount to WLFC's 14.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WNC's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WLFC's 13.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $317M | $464M | $1.7B | $90M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $728M | $445M | $4.4B | $104M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.54x | -7.48x | 14.65x | -5.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 16.27x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.21x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.92x | — | 13.38x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.21x | 133.54x | 2.54x | 2.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.88x | 2.26x | 2.18x | 41.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — HYLN and WLFC each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WLFC delivers a 17.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-8 for GNSS. HYLN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GNSS's 9.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WNC scores 4/9 vs GNSS's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -17.3% | -29.8% | +17.1% | -8.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.0% | -28.1% | +3.2% | -22.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +37.4% | -23.7% | +5.3% | -56.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +32.6% | -29.6% | +6.2% | -68.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.20x | 0.02x | 3.74x | 9.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $411M | -$19M | $2.7B | $13M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $32M | $23M | $16M | $8M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $443M | $4M | $2.7B | $21M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.97x | — | 1.79x | -31.66x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WLFC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WLFC five years ago would be worth $54,075 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,708 for HYLN. Over the past 12 months, WLFC leads with a +68.2% total return vs WNC's +0.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WLFC at 64.4% vs WNC's -28.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.0% | +35.7% | +68.4% | -8.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.4% | +52.5% | +68.2% | +2.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.9% | +40.3% | +344.6% | -31.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.5% | -72.9% | +440.7% | -66.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.6% | -74.5% | +879.9% | +14.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -28.8% | +12.0% | +64.4% | -11.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HYLN and GNSS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GNSS is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HYLN's 2.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HYLN currently trades 96.5% from its 52-week high vs WNC's 60.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.93x | 2.39x | 1.66x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.94 | $2.56 | $239.44 | $2.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.10 | $1.11 | $114.01 | $1.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.3% | +96.5% | +94.2% | +74.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.7 | 73.4 | 75.6 | 59.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 598K | 949K | 76K | 95K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WNC and GNSS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WNC as "Hold", HYLN as "Hold", WLFC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 124.4% upside for WNC (target: $18) vs 26.7% for HYLN (target: $3). For income investors, WNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.23% vs WLFC's 0.36%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.50 | $3.13 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 6 | 1 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.2% | — | +0.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.33 | — | $0.81 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +10.6% | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
WLFC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). WNC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
WNC vs HYLN vs WLFC vs GNSS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WNC or HYLN or WLFC or GNSS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hyliion Holdings Corp.
(HYLN) is the stronger pick with 130. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -20. 8% for Wabash National Corporation (WNC). Wabash National Corporation (WNC) offers the better valuation at 1. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WNC or HYLN or WLFC or GNSS?
On trailing P/E, Wabash National Corporation (WNC) is the cheapest at 1.
5x versus Willis Lease Finance Corporation at 14. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WNC or HYLN or WLFC or GNSS?
Over the past 5 years, Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) delivered a total return of +440.
7%, compared to -72. 9% for Hyliion Holdings Corp. (HYLN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WLFC returned +879. 9% versus HYLN's -74. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WNC or HYLN or WLFC or GNSS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Genasys Inc.
(GNSS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus Hyliion Holdings Corp. 's 2. 39β — meaning HYLN is approximately 175% more volatile than GNSS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hyliion Holdings Corp. (HYLN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 10% for Genasys Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WNC or HYLN or WLFC or GNSS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hyliion Holdings Corp.
(HYLN) is pulling ahead at 130. 3% versus -20. 8% for Wabash National Corporation (WNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wabash National Corporation grew EPS 179. 2% year-over-year, compared to -10. 0% for Hyliion Holdings Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WLFC leads at 29. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WNC or HYLN or WLFC or GNSS?
Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
8% net margin versus -1645. 7% for Hyliion Holdings Corp. — meaning it keeps 16. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WLFC leads at 32. 3% versus -1886. 4% for HYLN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WLFC leads at 65. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WNC or HYLN or WLFC or GNSS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WNC: 124.
4% to $17. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — WNC or HYLN or WLFC or GNSS?
In this comparison, WNC (4.
2% yield), WLFC (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. HYLN, GNSS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WNC or HYLN or WLFC or GNSS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Genasys Inc.
(GNSS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87)). Hyliion Holdings Corp. (HYLN) carries a higher beta of 2. 39 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GNSS: +14. 9%, HYLN: -74. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WNC and HYLN and WLFC and GNSS?
These companies operate in different sectors (WNC (Industrials) and HYLN (Consumer Cyclical) and WLFC (Industrials) and GNSS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WNC is a small-cap deep-value stock; HYLN is a small-cap high-growth stock; WLFC is a small-cap high-growth stock; GNSS is a small-cap high-growth stock. WNC pays a dividend while HYLN, WLFC, GNSS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.