Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
WPRT vs ATMU vs CLNE vs ALSN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Auto - Parts
WPRT vs ATMU vs CLNE vs ALSN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $35M | $4.54B | $485M | $10.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $160M | $1.35B | $439M | $3.65B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-61M | $211M | $-99M | $543M |
| Gross Margin | 19.2% | 39.2% | 11.7% | 40.8% |
| Operating Margin | -9.3% | 23.0% | 7.4% | 24.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 18.9x | — | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $53M | $570M | $99M | $2.92B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $37M | $236M | $158M | $1.50B |
WPRT vs ATMU vs CLNE vs ALSN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Westport Fuel Syste… (WPRT) | 100 | 28.0 | -72.0% |
| Atmus Filtration Te… (ATMU) | 100 | 268.0 | +168.0% |
| Clean Energy Fuels … (CLNE) | 100 | 55.0 | -45.0% |
| Allison Transmissio… (ALSN) | 100 | 262.5 | +162.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WPRT vs ATMU vs CLNE vs ALSN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WPRT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.84, Low D/E 38.5%, current ratio 1.55x
- Beta 0.84 vs ATMU's 1.36, lower leverage
ATMU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.7%, EPS growth 12.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.1%
- 5.7% revenue growth vs WPRT's -8.9%
- 15.7% margin vs WPRT's -37.9%
- +53.2% vs WPRT's -29.2%
CLNE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ALSN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 1.08, yield 0.9%
- 377.7% 10Y total return vs ATMU's 158.5%
- PEG 0.62 vs ATMU's 2.40
- Beta 1.08, yield 0.9%, current ratio 4.85x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.7% revenue growth vs WPRT's -8.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.1x vs 18.9x), PEG 0.62 vs 2.40 | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.7% margin vs WPRT's -37.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.84 vs ATMU's 1.36, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs ATMU's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.2% vs WPRT's -29.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.4% ROA vs WPRT's -25.2%, ROIC 31.2% vs -10.8% |
WPRT vs ATMU vs CLNE vs ALSN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WPRT vs ATMU vs CLNE vs ALSN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ALSN leads in 4 of 6 categories
ATMU leads 1 • WPRT leads 0 • CLNE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALSN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALSN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.6B annually — 22.8x WPRT's $160M. ATMU is the more profitable business, keeping 15.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WPRT's -37.9%. On growth, ALSN holds the edge at +83.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $160M | $1.3B | $439M | $3.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | $333M | $62M | $970M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$61M | $211M | -$99M | $543M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1M | $158M | $19M | $713M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.2% | +39.2% | +11.7% | +40.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.3% | +23.0% | +7.4% | +24.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -37.9% | +15.7% | -22.7% | +14.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.9% | +11.7% | +4.3% | +19.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -97.6% | -100.0% | +13.3% | +83.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -160.9% | +9.3% | +90.0% | -40.4% |
Valuation Metrics
ALSN leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.9x trailing earnings, ALSN trades at a 24% valuation discount to ATMU's 22.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ALSN offers better value at 0.74x vs ATMU's 2.82x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $35M | $4.5B | $485M | $10.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $50M | $4.9B | $426M | $11.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.57x | 22.24x | -2.19x | 16.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 18.93x | — | 14.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.82x | — | 0.74x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.29x | 90.01x | 10.71x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.11x | 2.57x | 1.14x | 3.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.25x | 12.16x | 0.86x | 5.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 30.51x | 8.10x | 15.91x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ATMU leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ATMU delivers a 58.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $59 in annual profit, vs $-52 for WPRT. CLNE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALSN's 1.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ATMU scores 7/9 vs CLNE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -52.3% | +58.8% | -17.2% | +29.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -25.2% | +14.4% | -9.2% | +8.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -10.8% | +31.2% | -9.4% | +22.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -12.2% | +31.6% | -9.4% | +18.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.39x | 1.51x | 0.18x | 1.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $16M | $334M | -$59M | $1.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $37M | $236M | $158M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $53M | $570M | $99M | $2.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.06x | 6.02x | -1.07x | 64.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ALSN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALSN five years ago would be worth $28,577 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $378 for WPRT. Over the past 12 months, ATMU leads with a +53.2% total return vs WPRT's -29.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALSN at 38.3% vs WPRT's -36.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.3% | +6.2% | +2.3% | +25.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -29.2% | +53.2% | +29.2% | +26.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.5% | +158.5% | -48.6% | +164.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.2% | +158.5% | -74.8% | +185.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.6% | +158.5% | -30.1% | +377.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -36.6% | +37.2% | -19.9% | +38.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WPRT and ALSN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WPRT is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ATMU's 1.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALSN currently trades 90.4% from its 52-week high vs WPRT's 48.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.84x | 1.36x | 1.04x | 1.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.15 | $66.50 | $3.11 | $137.42 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.54 | $34.58 | $1.60 | $76.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.0% | +83.6% | +71.1% | +90.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.9 | 41.7 | 49.0 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 39K | 1.0M | 1.4M | 802K |
Analyst Outlook
ALSN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ATMU as "Buy", CLNE as "Buy", ALSN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 58.4% upside for CLNE (target: $4) vs -27.5% for ATMU (target: $40). For income investors, ALSN offers the higher dividend yield at 0.86% vs ATMU's 0.38%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $40.33 | $3.50 | $116.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 | 22 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% | — | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | — | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.21 | — | $1.07 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.3% | +1.6% | +3.2% |
ALSN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ATMU leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
WPRT vs ATMU vs CLNE vs ALSN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WPRT or ATMU or CLNE or ALSN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc.
(ATMU) is the stronger pick with 5. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 9% for Westport Fuel Systems Inc. (WPRT). Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN) offers the better valuation at 16. 9x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WPRT or ATMU or CLNE or ALSN?
On trailing P/E, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
(ALSN) is the cheapest at 16. 9x versus Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. at 22. 2x. On forward P/E, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 62x versus Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. 's 2. 40x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WPRT or ATMU or CLNE or ALSN?
Over the past 5 years, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
(ALSN) delivered a total return of +185. 8%, compared to -96. 2% for Westport Fuel Systems Inc. (WPRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALSN returned +377. 7% versus WPRT's -91. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WPRT or ATMU or CLNE or ALSN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Westport Fuel Systems Inc.
(WPRT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 84β versus Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. 's 1. 36β — meaning ATMU is approximately 62% more volatile than WPRT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (CLNE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 156% for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WPRT or ATMU or CLNE or ALSN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc.
(ATMU) is pulling ahead at 5. 7% versus -8. 9% for Westport Fuel Systems Inc. (WPRT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Westport Fuel Systems Inc. grew EPS 56. 9% year-over-year, compared to -173. 0% for Clean Energy Fuels Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ATMU leads at 4. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WPRT or ATMU or CLNE or ALSN?
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
(ALSN) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 7% net margin versus -52. 3% for Clean Energy Fuels Corp. — meaning it keeps 20. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALSN leads at 32. 3% versus -22. 1% for CLNE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALSN leads at 48. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WPRT or ATMU or CLNE or ALSN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 62x versus Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. 's 2. 40x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 18. 9x for Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. — 4. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CLNE: 58. 4% to $3. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — WPRT or ATMU or CLNE or ALSN?
In this comparison, ALSN (0.
9% yield), ATMU (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. WPRT, CLNE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WPRT or ATMU or CLNE or ALSN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
(ALSN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 08), 0. 9% yield, +377. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALSN: +377. 7%, ATMU: +158. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WPRT and ATMU and CLNE and ALSN?
These companies operate in different sectors (WPRT (Consumer Cyclical) and ATMU (Industrials) and CLNE (Energy) and ALSN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WPRT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ATMU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLNE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALSN is a mid-cap deep-value stock. ALSN pays a dividend while WPRT, ATMU, CLNE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.