Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
WTI vs CVX vs BP vs SLB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Integrated
Oil & Gas Integrated
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
WTI vs CVX vs BP vs SLB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Integrated | Oil & Gas Integrated | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $626M | $384.42B | $121.38B | $84.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $501M | $184.43B | $194.60B | $35.71B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-150M | $12.30B | $3.20B | $3.35B |
| Gross Margin | 21.2% | 30.4% | 19.3% | 18.2% |
| Operating Margin | -10.5% | 9.0% | 10.7% | 15.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.9x | 9.1x | 20.9x |
| Total Debt | $351M | $46.74B | $84.27B | $12.31B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $141M | $6.47B | $36.56B | $3.04B |
WTI vs CVX vs BP vs SLB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| W&T Offshore, Inc. (WTI) | 100 | 146.4 | +46.4% |
| Chevron Corporation (CVX) | 100 | 210.8 | +110.8% |
| BP p.l.c. (BP) | 100 | 192.9 | +92.9% |
| SLB N.V. (SLB) | 100 | 298.6 | +198.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WTI vs CVX vs BP vs SLB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WTI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in stability and momentum.
- Beta 0.01 vs SLB's 0.87
- +269.6% vs CVX's +47.3%
CVX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 143.3% 10Y total return vs BP's 107.2%
- 3.6% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs BP's 4.1%
BP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta -0.01, yield 4.1%
- 0.1% revenue growth vs CVX's -4.6%
- Lower P/E (9.1x vs 20.9x)
SLB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth -1.6%, EPS growth -24.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 45.1%, current ratio 1.33x
- Beta 0.87, yield 1.9%, current ratio 1.33x
- 9.4% margin vs WTI's -29.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.1% revenue growth vs CVX's -4.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.1x vs 20.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.4% margin vs WTI's -29.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs SLB's 0.87 | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs BP's 4.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +269.6% vs CVX's +47.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs WTI's -15.1%, ROIC 12.1% vs -32.5% |
WTI vs CVX vs BP vs SLB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WTI vs CVX vs BP vs SLB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SLB leads in 2 of 6 categories
BP leads 1 • WTI leads 0 • CVX leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BP is the larger business by revenue, generating $194.6B annually — 388.1x WTI's $501M. SLB is the more profitable business, keeping 9.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WTI's -29.9%. On growth, BP holds the edge at +11.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $501M | $184.4B | $194.6B | $35.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $80M | $37.1B | $38.8B | $7.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$150M | $12.3B | $3.2B | $3.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $45M | $16.2B | $11.4B | $4.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.2% | +30.4% | +19.3% | +18.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10.5% | +9.0% | +10.7% | +15.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -29.9% | +6.7% | +1.6% | +9.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.9% | +8.8% | +5.9% | +13.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.1% | -5.3% | +11.2% | +5.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.5% | -24.5% | +4.5% | -31.2% |
Valuation Metrics
BP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.8x trailing earnings, SLB trades at a 99% valuation discount to BP's 2279.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BP's 5.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SLB's 12.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $626M | $384.4B | $121.4B | $84.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $837M | $424.7B | $169.1B | $93.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.17x | 29.06x | 2279.41x | 23.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.86x | 9.06x | 20.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.63x | 11.44x | 5.03x | 12.67x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.25x | 2.08x | 0.64x | 2.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.86x | 1.67x | 3.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.56x | 23.17x | 10.74x | 17.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SLB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SLB delivers a 13.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $4 for BP. CVX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BP's 1.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BP scores 7/9 vs SLB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +7.2% | +4.2% | +13.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.1% | +4.2% | +1.1% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -32.5% | +6.2% | +9.8% | +12.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.7% | +6.6% | +7.8% | +14.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.24x | 1.14x | 0.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $210M | $40.3B | $47.7B | $9.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $141M | $6.5B | $36.6B | $3.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $351M | $46.7B | $84.3B | $12.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.80x | 17.22x | 3.55x | 9.40x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — WTI and CVX and BP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CVX five years ago would be worth $20,515 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,529 for WTI. Over the past 12 months, WTI leads with a +269.6% total return vs CVX's +47.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BP at 11.9% vs WTI's 0.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +162.1% | +24.7% | +31.2% | +40.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +269.6% | +47.3% | +66.1% | +69.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.9% | +32.5% | +40.2% | +29.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.3% | +105.2% | +104.5% | +99.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +85.8% | +143.3% | +107.2% | -8.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.3% | +9.8% | +11.9% | +9.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CVX and SLB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CVX is the less volatile stock with a -0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SLB's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SLB currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs CVX's 89.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.01x | -0.05x | -0.01x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.49 | $214.71 | $48.27 | $57.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.15 | $133.77 | $27.99 | $31.64 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.8% | +89.7% | +96.3% | +97.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.9 | 52.4 | 57.1 | 61.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9.4M | 11.0M | 15.0M | 16.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CVX and BP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WTI as "Hold", CVX as "Buy", BP as "Hold", SLB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1.7% upside for SLB (target: $57) vs -5.6% for BP (target: $44). For income investors, BP offers the higher dividend yield at 4.11% vs WTI's 0.96%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $190.93 | $43.89 | $56.95 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 53 | 44 | 66 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | +3.6% | +4.1% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.04 | $6.87 | $1.91 | $1.08 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.1% | +3.7% | +2.9% |
SLB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
WTI vs CVX vs BP vs SLB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WTI or CVX or BP or SLB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BP p.
l. c. (BP) is the stronger pick with 0. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 6% for Chevron Corporation (CVX). SLB N. V. (SLB) offers the better valuation at 23. 8x trailing P/E (20. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chevron Corporation (CVX) a "Buy" — based on 53 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WTI or CVX or BP or SLB?
On trailing P/E, SLB N.
V. (SLB) is the cheapest at 23. 8x versus BP p. l. c. at 2279. 4x. On forward P/E, BP p. l. c. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WTI or CVX or BP or SLB?
Over the past 5 years, Chevron Corporation (CVX) delivered a total return of +105.
2%, compared to +25. 3% for W&T Offshore, Inc. (WTI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CVX returned +143. 3% versus SLB's -8. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WTI or CVX or BP or SLB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chevron Corporation (CVX) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
05β versus SLB N. V. 's 0. 87β — meaning SLB is approximately -1761% more volatile than CVX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chevron Corporation (CVX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 114% for BP p. l. c. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WTI or CVX or BP or SLB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BP p.
l. c. (BP) is pulling ahead at 0. 1% versus -4. 6% for Chevron Corporation (CVX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SLB N. V. grew EPS -24. 4% year-over-year, compared to -85. 4% for BP p. l. c.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SLB leads at 8. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WTI or CVX or BP or SLB?
SLB N.
V. (SLB) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 4% net margin versus -29. 9% for W&T Offshore, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SLB leads at 15. 3% versus -10. 5% for WTI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVX leads at 30. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WTI or CVX or BP or SLB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, BP p.
l. c. (BP) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 20. 9x for SLB N. V. — 11. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLB: 1. 7% to $56. 95.
08Which pays a better dividend — WTI or CVX or BP or SLB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
BP p. l. c. (BP) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 1. 0% for W&T Offshore, Inc. (WTI).
09Is WTI or CVX or BP or SLB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chevron Corporation (CVX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
05), 3. 6% yield, +143. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CVX: +143. 3%, SLB: -8. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WTI and CVX and BP and SLB?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WTI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CVX is a large-cap income-oriented stock; BP is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; SLB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.