WTW vs HWC

For growth investors, Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC) is the stronger pick with -1.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (WTW). Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC) offers the better valuation at 12. 0x trailing P/E (10. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (WTW) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC) is the cheapest at 12.

0x versus Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company at 15. 9x. On forward P/E, Hancock Whitney Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 7x.

Over the past 5 years, Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC) delivered a total return of +52.

2%, compared to +1. 9% for Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (WTW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HWC returned +223. 3% versus WTW's +132. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (WTW) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

13β versus Hancock Whitney Corporation's 1. 14β — meaning HWC is approximately 744% more volatile than WTW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 86% for Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC) is pulling ahead at -1.

5% versus -2. 2% for Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (WTW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company grew EPS 1794% year-over-year, compared to 7. 6% for Hancock Whitney Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC) is the more profitable company, earning 24.

1% net margin versus 16. 5% for Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company — meaning it keeps 24. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HWC leads at 31. 0% versus 23. 0% for WTW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HWC leads at 73. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC) trades at 10.

7x forward P/E versus 13. 2x for Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company — 2. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WTW: 31. 1% to $338. 42.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC) offers the highest yield at 2. 7%, versus 1. 4% for Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (WTW).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (WTW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

13), 1. 4% yield, +132. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WTW: +132. 7%, HWC: +223. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.