Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

WWR vs CBAT vs MVST vs SES vs ALB

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
WWR
Westwater Resources, Inc.

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsAMEX • US
Market Cap$61M
5Y Perf.-87.7%
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$70M
5Y Perf.-84.6%
MVST
Microvast Holdings, Inc.

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$611M
5Y Perf.-84.6%
SES
SES AI Corporation

Auto - Parts

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$302M
5Y Perf.-90.6%
ALB
Albemarle Corporation

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$23.37B
5Y Perf.+35.8%

WWR vs CBAT vs MVST vs SES vs ALB — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
WWR logoWWR
CBAT logoCBAT
MVST logoMVST
SES logoSES
ALB logoALB
IndustryIndustrial MaterialsElectrical Equipment & PartsElectrical Equipment & PartsAuto - PartsChemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$61M$70M$611M$302M$23.37B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$162M$428M$22M$5.49B
Net Income (TTM)$-19M$-7M$-29M$-73M$-233M
Gross Margin10.8%28.6%36.3%18.5%
Operating Margin-10.5%1.6%-352.3%5.6%
Forward P/E6.0x31.5x22.4x
Total Debt$6M$30M$186M$8M$3.30B
Cash & Equiv.$49M$7M$105M$30M$1.62B

WWR vs CBAT vs MVST vs SES vs ALBLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

WWR
CBAT
MVST
SES
ALB
StockMar 21May 26Return
Westwater Resources… (WWR)10012.3-87.7%
CBAK Energy Technol… (CBAT)10015.4-84.6%
Microvast Holdings,… (MVST)10015.4-84.6%
SES AI Corporation (SES)1009.4-90.6%
Albemarle Corporati… (ALB)100135.8+35.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: WWR vs CBAT vs MVST vs SES vs ALB

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CBAT and ALB are tied at the top with 3 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Albemarle Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. SES also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
WWR
Westwater Resources, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

WWR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.49, Low D/E 3.3%, current ratio 4.20x
  • Beta 1.49, current ratio 4.20x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
The Value Play

CBAT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Lower P/E (6.0x vs 22.4x)
  • -4.0% margin vs SES's -331.7%
  • Beta 1.05 vs SES's 2.91
Best for: value and quality
MVST
Microvast Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Play

MVST is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 12.6%, EPS growth 85.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.9%
Best for: growth exposure
SES
SES AI Corporation
The Growth Leader

SES ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.

  • 9.3% revenue growth vs WWR's -138.7%
Best for: growth
ALB
Albemarle Corporation
The Income Pick

ALB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 1.60, yield 0.8%
  • 217.0% 10Y total return vs CBAT's -69.9%
  • 0.8% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
  • +256.7% vs CBAT's -6.9%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSES logoSES9.3% revenue growth vs WWR's -138.7%
ValueCBAT logoCBATLower P/E (6.0x vs 22.4x)
Quality / MarginsCBAT logoCBAT-4.0% margin vs SES's -331.7%
Stability / SafetyCBAT logoCBATBeta 1.05 vs SES's 2.91
DividendsALB logoALB0.8% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ALB logoALB+256.7% vs CBAT's -6.9%
Efficiency (ROA)ALB logoALB-1.4% ROA vs SES's -26.3%, ROIC 0.6% vs -35.1%

WWR vs CBAT vs MVST vs SES vs ALB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

WWRWestwater Resources, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
FY 2021
TotalHighPowerLithiumBatteriesUsedMember
39.8%$35M
UninterruptableSuppliesMember
38.1%$33M
PrecursorMember
10.4%$9M
CathodeMember
10.0%$9M
LightElectricVehiclesMember
0.8%$733,382
TradingOfRawMaterialsUsedInLithiumBatteriesMember
0.6%$519,796
ElectricVehiclesMember
0.3%$243,837
MVSTMicrovast Holdings, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

SESSES AI Corporation
FY 2025
Service
64.7%$14M
Product
35.3%$7M
ALBAlbemarle Corporation
FY 2025
Energy Storage
52.7%$2.7B
Specialties
26.6%$1.4B
Ketjen
20.7%$1.1B

WWR vs CBAT vs MVST vs SES vs ALB — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLALBLAGGINGSES

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — CBAT and MVST each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

ALB and WWR operate at a comparable scale, with $5.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -4.0% (CBAT) to -3.3% (SES). On growth, CBAT holds the edge at +36.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricWWR logoWWRWestwater Resourc…CBAT logoCBATCBAK Energy Techn…MVST logoMVSTMicrovast Holding…SES logoSESSES AI CorporationALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$162M$428M$22M$5.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$13M-$8M$32M-$67M$802M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$19M-$7M-$29M-$73M-$233M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$17M-$8M$56M-$58M$577M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+10.8%+28.6%+36.3%+18.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-10.5%+1.6%-3.5%+5.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-4.0%-6.8%-3.3%-4.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-5.1%+13.1%-2.6%+10.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+36.5%-15.0%+15.8%+32.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-125.6%+119.2%-6.1%
Evenly matched — CBAT and MVST each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CBAT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, CBAT's 5.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MVST's 99.0x.

MetricWWR logoWWRWestwater Resourc…CBAT logoCBATCBAK Energy Techn…MVST logoMVSTMicrovast Holding…SES logoSESSES AI CorporationALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
Market CapShares × price$61M$70M$611M$302M$23.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$18M$94M$692M$280M$25.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-2.06x6.04x-21.00x-4.25x-34.50x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.31.50x22.36x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple5.22x99.04x33.21x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.40x1.43x14.36x4.55x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.31x0.59x1.49x1.44x2.39x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF3.13x10.89x33.76x
CBAT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — WWR and CBAT and ALB each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

ALB delivers a -2.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-32 for SES. WWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MVST's 0.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CBAT scores 7/9 vs WWR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricWWR logoWWRWestwater Resourc…CBAT logoCBATCBAK Energy Techn…MVST logoMVSTMicrovast Holding…SES logoSESSES AI CorporationALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-14.2%-5.5%-7.4%-32.5%-2.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-12.8%-2.0%-2.9%-26.3%-1.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.6%+0.9%-35.1%+0.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.0%+1.2%-29.7%+0.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–927546
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x0.25x0.45x0.04x0.34x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$43M$23M$81M-$21M$1.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$49M$7M$105M$30M$1.6B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$6M$30M$186M$8M$3.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-24.86x-16.53x1.59x
Evenly matched — WWR and CBAT and ALB each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ALB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ALB five years ago would be worth $12,680 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $926 for SES. Over the past 12 months, ALB leads with a +256.7% total return vs CBAT's -6.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MVST at 16.7% vs SES's -15.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricWWR logoWWRWestwater Resourc…CBAT logoCBATCBAK Energy Techn…MVST logoMVSTMicrovast Holding…SES logoSESSES AI CorporationALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-20.5%-8.7%-33.0%-51.3%+38.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+33.3%-6.9%-2.1%+13.6%+256.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-34.7%+2.0%+58.8%-40.1%+9.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-83.9%-81.0%-84.4%-90.7%+26.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.1%-69.9%-80.7%-91.3%+217.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-13.2%+0.7%+16.7%-15.7%+3.0%
ALB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CBAT and ALB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CBAT is the less volatile stock with a 1.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SES's 2.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALB currently trades 89.8% from its 52-week high vs WWR's 17.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricWWR logoWWRWestwater Resourc…CBAT logoCBATCBAK Energy Techn…MVST logoMVSTMicrovast Holding…SES logoSESSES AI CorporationALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.49x1.05x2.45x2.91x1.60x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.75$1.25$7.12$3.73$221.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.45$0.77$1.37$0.79$53.70
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+17.6%+62.8%+26.5%+25.1%+89.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10050.439.654.440.253.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded941K111K3.9M8.9M2.0M
Evenly matched — CBAT and ALB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

ALB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: WWR as "Buy", MVST as "Buy", SES as "Hold", ALB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 189.0% upside for SES (target: $3) vs -3.8% for ALB (target: $191). ALB is the only dividend payer here at 0.82% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricWWR logoWWRWestwater Resourc…CBAT logoCBATCBAK Energy Techn…MVST logoMVSTMicrovast Holding…SES logoSESSES AI CorporationALB logoALBAlbemarle Corpora…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$4.80$2.70$190.80
# AnalystsCovering analysts16445
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises115
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.62
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.5%0.0%
ALB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

ALB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). CBAT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallAlbemarle Corporation (ALB)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

WWR vs CBAT vs MVST vs SES vs ALB: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is WWR or CBAT or MVST or SES or ALB a better buy right now?

For growth investors, SES AI Corporation (SES) is the stronger pick with 929.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 6% for CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT). CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT) offers the better valuation at 6. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Westwater Resources, Inc. (WWR) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — WWR or CBAT or MVST or SES or ALB?

On forward P/E, Albemarle Corporation is actually cheaper at 22.

4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — WWR or CBAT or MVST or SES or ALB?

Over the past 5 years, Albemarle Corporation (ALB) delivered a total return of +26.

8%, compared to -90. 7% for SES AI Corporation (SES). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALB returned +217. 0% versus WWR's -99. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — WWR or CBAT or MVST or SES or ALB?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.

(CBAT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 05β versus SES AI Corporation's 2. 91β — meaning SES is approximately 178% more volatile than CBAT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Westwater Resources, Inc. (WWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 45% for Microvast Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — WWR or CBAT or MVST or SES or ALB?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), SES AI Corporation (SES) is pulling ahead at 929.

4% versus -13. 6% for CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. grew EPS 574. 5% year-over-year, compared to -45. 5% for Westwater Resources, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CBAT leads at 49. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — WWR or CBAT or MVST or SES or ALB?

CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.

(CBAT) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 7% net margin versus -347. 8% for SES AI Corporation — meaning it keeps 6. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CBAT leads at 5. 0% versus -393. 4% for SES. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SES leads at 53. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is WWR or CBAT or MVST or SES or ALB more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Albemarle Corporation (ALB) trades at 22.

4x forward P/E versus 31. 5x for Microvast Holdings, Inc. — 9. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SES: 189. 0% to $2. 70.

08

Which pays a better dividend — WWR or CBAT or MVST or SES or ALB?

In this comparison, ALB (0.

8% yield) pays a dividend. WWR, CBAT, MVST, SES do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is WWR or CBAT or MVST or SES or ALB better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Albemarle Corporation (ALB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.

8% yield, +217. 0% 10Y return). SES AI Corporation (SES) carries a higher beta of 2. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALB: +217. 0%, SES: -91. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between WWR and CBAT and MVST and SES and ALB?

These companies operate in different sectors (WWR (Basic Materials) and CBAT (Industrials) and MVST (Industrials) and SES (Consumer Cyclical) and ALB (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: WWR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CBAT is a small-cap deep-value stock; MVST is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SES is a small-cap high-growth stock; ALB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ALB pays a dividend while WWR, CBAT, MVST, SES do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

WWR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CBAT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MVST

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SES

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ALB

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.