WWW
Wolverine World Wide, Inc.
Apparel - Footwear & Accessories
Market Cap$1.39B
5Y Perf.-18.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
WWW vs CAL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CAL
Caleres, Inc.
Apparel - Footwear & Accessories
Market Cap$445M
5Y Perf.+84.7%
WWW vs CAL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | WWW | CAL |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Footwear & Accessories | Apparel - Footwear & Accessories |
| Market Cap | $1.39B | $445M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.87B | $2.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $95M | $-7M |
| Gross Margin | 47.2% | 43.0% |
| Operating Margin | 7.9% | 0.5% |
| Forward P/E | 12.8x | 25.0x |
| Total Debt | $652M | $468M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $206M | $30M |
WWW vs CAL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
WWW
CAL
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wolverine World Wid… (WWW) | 100 | 81.3 | -18.7% |
| Caleres, Inc. (CAL) | 100 | 184.7 | +84.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WWW vs CAL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: WWW leads in 7 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
WWW
Wolverine World Wide, Inc.
The Income Pick
WWW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.74, yield 2.4%
- Rev growth 6.8%, EPS growth 159.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -11.3%
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs CAL's -34.9%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
CAL
Caleres, Inc.
The Income Angle
In this particular matchup, CAL is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | WWW | 6.8% revenue growth vs CAL's 1.3% |
| Value | WWW | Lower P/E (12.8x vs 25.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | WWW | 5.1% margin vs CAL's -0.3% |
| Stability / Safety | WWW | Beta 1.74 vs CAL's 2.34 |
| Dividends | WWW | 2.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs CAL's 2.2% |
| Momentum (1Y) | WWW | +17.7% vs CAL's -9.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | WWW | 5.5% ROA vs CAL's -0.3%, ROIC 11.6% vs 1.7% |
WWW vs CAL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2024
WWW vs CAL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLWWWLAGGINGCAL
CALCaleres, Inc.
0leads
WWWWolverine World Wide,…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CALMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
WWW5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
WWW6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
WWW4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
WWW1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WWW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAL and WWW operate at a comparable scale, with $2.8B and $1.9B in trailing revenue. WWW is the more profitable business, keeping 5.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CAL's -0.3%. On growth, CAL holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | WWWWolverine World W… | CALCaleres, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $2.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $163M | $36M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $95M | -$7M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $126M | $26M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.2% | +43.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | +0.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.1% | -0.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.7% | +0.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.6% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +102.0% | -5.7% |
WWW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — WWW and CAL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, WWW's 12.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CAL's 15.4x.
| Metric | WWWWolverine World W… | CALCaleres, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $445M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $883M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.18x | -60.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.80x | 25.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.25x | 15.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.74x | 0.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.59x | 0.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.11x | 13.76x |
Evenly matched — WWW and CAL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WWW leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WWW delivers a 17.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-1 for CAL. CAL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.77x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WWW's 1.22x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WWW scores 8/9 vs CAL's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | WWWWolverine World W… | CALCaleres, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.7% | -1.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.5% | -0.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.6% | +1.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.9% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.22x | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $446M | $438M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $206M | $30M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $652M | $468M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.19x | 0.79x |
WWW leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WWW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CAL five years ago would be worth $5,508 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,310 for WWW. Over the past 12 months, WWW leads with a +17.7% total return vs CAL's -9.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WWW at 5.3% vs CAL's -14.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | WWWWolverine World W… | CALCaleres, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.5% | +8.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +17.7% | -9.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.8% | -37.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.9% | -44.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.2% | -34.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.3% | -14.3% |
WWW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WWW and CAL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WWW is the less volatile stock with a 1.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAL's 2.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAL currently trades 72.5% from its 52-week high vs WWW's 51.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | WWWWolverine World W… | CALCaleres, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.74x | 2.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.80 | $18.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.47 | $8.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.9% | +72.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.7 | 58.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 643K |
Evenly matched — WWW and CAL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
WWW leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WWW as "Hold" and CAL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 35.9% upside for CAL (target: $18) vs 25.4% for WWW (target: $21). For income investors, WWW offers the higher dividend yield at 2.40% vs CAL's 2.19%.
| Metric | WWWWolverine World W… | CALCaleres, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.33 | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 38 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.41 | $0.29 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +2.0% |
WWW leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
WWW leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
Best OverallWolverine World Wide, Inc. (WWW)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
WWW vs CAL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WWW or CAL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Wolverine World Wide, Inc.
(WWW) is the stronger pick with 6. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 3% for Caleres, Inc. (CAL). Wolverine World Wide, Inc. (WWW) offers the better valuation at 0. 2x trailing P/E (12. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Caleres, Inc. (CAL) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WWW or CAL?
On forward P/E, Wolverine World Wide, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 12. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WWW or CAL?
Over the past 5 years, Caleres, Inc.
(CAL) delivered a total return of -44. 9%, compared to -56. 9% for Wolverine World Wide, Inc. (WWW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WWW returned +7. 2% versus CAL's -34. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WWW or CAL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Wolverine World Wide, Inc.
(WWW) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 74β versus Caleres, Inc. 's 2. 34β — meaning CAL is approximately 35% more volatile than WWW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Caleres, Inc. (CAL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 77% versus 122% for Wolverine World Wide, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WWW or CAL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Wolverine World Wide, Inc.
(WWW) is pulling ahead at 6. 8% versus 1. 3% for Caleres, Inc. (CAL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wolverine World Wide, Inc. grew EPS 159. 5% year-over-year, compared to -107. 1% for Caleres, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CAL leads at -2. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WWW or CAL?
Wolverine World Wide, Inc.
(WWW) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 1% net margin versus -0. 3% for Caleres, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WWW leads at 8. 0% versus 1. 0% for CAL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WWW leads at 47. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WWW or CAL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Wolverine World Wide, Inc.
(WWW) trades at 12. 8x forward P/E versus 25. 0x for Caleres, Inc. — 12. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CAL: 35. 9% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — WWW or CAL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Wolverine World Wide, Inc. (WWW) offers the highest yield at 2. 4%, versus 2. 2% for Caleres, Inc. (CAL).
09Is WWW or CAL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Wolverine World Wide, Inc.
(WWW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2. 4% yield). Caleres, Inc. (CAL) carries a higher beta of 2. 34 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WWW: +7. 2%, CAL: -34. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WWW and CAL?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WWW is a small-cap deep-value stock; CAL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(WWW: 4.6% · CAL: 8.7%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.