REIT - Specialty
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WY vs UFPI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Paper, Lumber & Forest Products
WY vs UFPI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Specialty | Paper, Lumber & Forest Products |
| Market Cap | $17.09B | $4.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.92B | $6.19B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $397M | $264M |
| Gross Margin | 13.4% | 16.6% |
| Operating Margin | 7.7% | 5.4% |
| Forward P/E | 83.6x | 15.7x |
| Total Debt | $5.57B | $230M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $464M | $925M |
WY vs UFPI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) | 100 | 117.4 | +17.4% |
| UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI) | 100 | 180.5 | +80.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WY vs UFPI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.51, yield 3.5%
- Rev growth -3.1%, EPS growth -16.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -12.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.51, Low D/E 59.1%, current ratio 1.29x
UFPI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 228.4% 10Y total return vs WY's 14.4%
- Lower P/E (15.7x vs 83.6x)
- 6.5% ROA vs WY's 2.4%, ROIC 11.4% vs 2.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -3.1% FFO/revenue growth vs UFPI's -5.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.7x vs 83.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.7% margin vs UFPI's 4.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs UFPI's 0.92 | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, vs UFPI's 1.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -5.0% vs UFPI's -15.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs WY's 2.4%, ROIC 11.4% vs 2.4% |
WY vs UFPI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
WY vs UFPI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WY and UFPI operate at a comparable scale, with $6.9B and $6.2B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.7% (WY) to 4.3% (UFPI). On growth, WY holds the edge at -2.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.9B | $6.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.0B | $498M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $397M | $264M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $516M | $298M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | +16.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +5.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +4.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.5% | +4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.0% | -8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | -31.5% |
Valuation Metrics
UFPI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.5x trailing earnings, UFPI trades at a 69% valuation discount to WY's 52.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UFPI's 7.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WY's 22.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17.1B | $4.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $22.2B | $4.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 52.67x | 16.51x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 83.63x | 15.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.79x | 7.56x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.47x | 0.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.81x | 1.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 194.19x | 16.96x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UFPI leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UFPI delivers a 8.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $4 for WY. UFPI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WY's 0.59x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.2% | +8.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.4% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.4% | +11.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.0% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.1B | -$695M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $464M | $925M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.6B | $230M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.95x | 43.92x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UFPI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UFPI five years ago would be worth $10,126 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,918 for WY. Over the past 12 months, WY leads with a -5.0% total return vs UFPI's -15.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UFPI at 2.0% vs WY's -4.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.5% | -10.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -5.0% | -15.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.5% | +6.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.8% | +1.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.4% | +228.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.0% | +2.0% |
Risk & Volatility
WY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WY is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UFPI's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WY currently trades 85.1% from its 52-week high vs UFPI's 69.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.51x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.86 | $118.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.16 | $80.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.1% | +69.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.4 | 25.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.1M | 379K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WY and UFPI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WY as "Buy" and UFPI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.9% upside for WY (target: $30) vs 24.8% for UFPI (target: $103). For income investors, WY offers the higher dividend yield at 3.54% vs UFPI's 1.69%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.83 | $103.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.5% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.84 | $1.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | +9.2% |
UFPI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). WY leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
WY vs UFPI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WY or UFPI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is the stronger pick with -3.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 0% for UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI). UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI) offers the better valuation at 16. 5x trailing P/E (15. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WY or UFPI?
On trailing P/E, UFP Industries, Inc.
(UFPI) is the cheapest at 16. 5x versus Weyerhaeuser Company at 52. 7x. On forward P/E, UFP Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WY or UFPI?
Over the past 5 years, UFP Industries, Inc.
(UFPI) delivered a total return of +1. 3%, compared to -20. 8% for Weyerhaeuser Company (WY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UFPI returned +228. 4% versus WY's +14. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WY or UFPI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
51β versus UFP Industries, Inc. 's 0. 92β — meaning UFPI is approximately 80% more volatile than WY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 59% for Weyerhaeuser Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WY or UFPI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is pulling ahead at -3.
1% versus -5. 0% for UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Weyerhaeuser Company grew EPS -16. 7% year-over-year, compared to -26. 1% for UFP Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WY leads at -12. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WY or UFPI?
Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
7% net margin versus 4. 7% for UFP Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WY leads at 6. 7% versus 5. 8% for UFPI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UFPI leads at 16. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WY or UFPI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, UFP Industries, Inc.
(UFPI) trades at 15. 7x forward P/E versus 83. 6x for Weyerhaeuser Company — 68. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WY: 25. 9% to $29. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — WY or UFPI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 1. 7% for UFP Industries, Inc. (UFPI).
09Is WY or UFPI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
51), 3. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WY: +14. 4%, UFPI: +228. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WY and UFPI?
These companies operate in different sectors (WY (Real Estate) and UFPI (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WY is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; UFPI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.