Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

WYFI vs IIIV vs ALLT vs SHEN vs LMND

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
WYFI
WhiteFiber, Inc. Ordinary Shares

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$998M
5Y Perf.+10.0%
IIIV
i3 Verticals, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$418M
5Y Perf.-21.8%
ALLT
Allot Ltd.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$350M
5Y Perf.-31.0%
SHEN
Shenandoah Telecommunications Company

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$862M
5Y Perf.-69.0%
LMND
Lemonade, Inc.

Insurance - Property & Casualty

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.24B
5Y Perf.-5.2%

WYFI vs IIIV vs ALLT vs SHEN vs LMND — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
WYFI logoWYFI
IIIV logoIIIV
ALLT logoALLT
SHEN logoSHEN
LMND logoLMND
IndustryInformation Technology ServicesSoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - InfrastructureTelecommunications ServicesInsurance - Property & Casualty
Market Cap$998M$418M$350M$862M$4.24B
Revenue (TTM)$51M$217M$102M$266M$821M
Net Income (TTM)$-9M$18M$4M$-36M$-139M
Gross Margin30.9%58.2%70.3%37.9%47.6%
Operating Margin-9.3%0.7%3.5%-10.3%-16.3%
Forward P/E720.7x16.8x27.2x
Total Debt$13M$8M$11M$642M$182M
Cash & Equiv.$12M$67M$21M$27M$385M

WYFI vs IIIV vs ALLT vs SHEN vs LMNDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

WYFI
IIIV
ALLT
SHEN
LMND
StockJul 20May 26Return
i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV)10078.2-21.8%
Allot Ltd. (ALLT)10069.0-31.0%
Shenandoah Telecomm… (SHEN)10031.0-69.0%
Lemonade, Inc. (LMND)10094.8-5.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: WYFI vs IIIV vs ALLT vs SHEN vs LMND

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: IIIV leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Lemonade, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. SHEN also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
WYFI
WhiteFiber, Inc. Ordinary Shares
The Long-Run Compounder

WYFI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 60.9% 10Y total return vs ALLT's 77.5%
Best for: long-term compounding
IIIV
i3 Verticals, Inc.
The Income Pick

IIIV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 0.85
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.85, Low D/E 1.5%, current ratio 1.95x
  • Beta 0.85, current ratio 1.95x
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
ALLT
Allot Ltd.
The Quality Angle

Among these 5 stocks, ALLT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
SHEN
Shenandoah Telecommunications Company
The Income Pick

SHEN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.

  • 0.8% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: dividends
LMND
Lemonade, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

LMND is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 40.2%, EPS growth 19.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 42.2%
  • 40.2% revenue growth vs IIIV's -7.3%
  • +72.5% vs IIIV's -25.4%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLMND logoLMND40.2% revenue growth vs IIIV's -7.3%
ValueIIIV logoIIIVBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsIIIV logoIIIV8.3% margin vs WYFI's -17.0%
Stability / SafetyIIIV logoIIIVBeta 0.85 vs WYFI's 4.22, lower leverage
DividendsSHEN logoSHEN0.8% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)LMND logoLMND+72.5% vs IIIV's -25.4%
Efficiency (ROA)IIIV logoIIIV2.9% ROA vs LMND's -7.4%, ROIC 0.6% vs -36.8%

WYFI vs IIIV vs ALLT vs SHEN vs LMND — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

WYFIWhiteFiber, Inc. Ordinary Shares

Segment breakdown not available.

IIIVi3 Verticals, Inc.
FY 2025
License and Service
93.7%$149M
Other Revenue
6.3%$10M
ALLTAllot Ltd.
FY 2025
Service
69.6%$71M
Product
30.4%$31M
SHENShenandoah Telecommunications Company
FY 2025
Service
100.0%$351M
LMNDLemonade, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$738M

WYFI vs IIIV vs ALLT vs SHEN vs LMND — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLIIIVLAGGINGSHEN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

IIIV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

LMND is the larger business by revenue, generating $821M annually — 16.3x WYFI's $51M. IIIV is the more profitable business, keeping 8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WYFI's -17.0%. On growth, LMND holds the edge at +55.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricWYFI logoWYFIWhiteFiber, Inc. …IIIV logoIIIVi3 Verticals, Inc.ALLT logoALLTAllot Ltd.SHEN logoSHENShenandoah Teleco…LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$51M$217M$102M$266M$821M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$11M$30M$8M$104M-$121M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$9M$18M$4M-$36M-$139M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$245M$50M$16M-$276M$20M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+30.9%+58.2%+70.3%+37.9%+47.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-9.3%+0.7%+3.5%-10.3%-16.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-17.0%+8.3%+3.6%-13.7%-16.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-4.8%+22.8%+16.1%-103.5%+2.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-98.6%-8.8%+14.0%-100.0%+55.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+5.8%-18.2%+45.3%
IIIV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

IIIV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 33.8x trailing earnings, IIIV trades at a 95% valuation discount to WYFI's 720.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IIIV's 11.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WYFI's 52.3x.

MetricWYFI logoWYFIWhiteFiber, Inc. …IIIV logoIIIVi3 Verticals, Inc.ALLT logoALLTAllot Ltd.SHEN logoSHENShenandoah Teleco…LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$998M$418M$350M$862M$4.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1000M$359M$341M$1.5B$4.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS720.72x33.77x104.49x-21.96x-23.97x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.16.75x27.20x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple52.30x11.25x44.50x13.48x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue20.95x1.96x3.43x2.41x5.74x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share5.81x1.25x3.41x0.89x7.42x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF111.32x22.59x
IIIV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

IIIV leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

ALLT delivers a 4.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-27 for LMND. IIIV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SHEN's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WYFI scores 9/9 vs SHEN's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricWYFI logoWYFIWhiteFiber, Inc. …IIIV logoIIIVi3 Verticals, Inc.ALLT logoALLTAllot Ltd.SHEN logoSHENShenandoah Teleco…LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-1.8%+3.7%+4.0%-3.7%-26.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-1.5%+2.9%+2.3%-2.0%-7.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+1.7%+0.6%+2.9%-1.1%-36.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.2%+0.7%+3.1%-1.3%-22.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–995734
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.08x0.01x0.10x0.66x0.34x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$2M-$59M-$10M$614M-$203M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$12M$67M$21M$27M$385M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$13M$8M$11M$642M$182M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.55x-0.65x
IIIV leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

LMND leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in WYFI five years ago would be worth $16,085 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,221 for ALLT. Over the past 12 months, LMND leads with a +72.5% total return vs IIIV's -25.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LMND at 53.4% vs SHEN's -6.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricWYFI logoWYFIWhiteFiber, Inc. …IIIV logoIIIVi3 Verticals, Inc.ALLT logoALLTAllot Ltd.SHEN logoSHENShenandoah Teleco…LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+55.0%-25.1%-13.3%+37.8%-27.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+60.9%-25.4%+6.5%+30.5%+72.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+60.9%-11.2%+211.5%-17.7%+260.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+60.9%-37.1%-47.8%-28.7%-8.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+60.9%+3.1%+77.5%+17.9%-20.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+17.2%-3.9%+46.0%-6.3%+53.4%
LMND leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — IIIV and SHEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

IIIV is the less volatile stock with a 0.85 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WYFI's 4.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHEN currently trades 89.9% from its 52-week high vs LMND's 55.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricWYFI logoWYFIWhiteFiber, Inc. …IIIV logoIIIVi3 Verticals, Inc.ALLT logoALLTAllot Ltd.SHEN logoSHENShenandoah Teleco…LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5004.22x0.85x2.36x0.87x2.68x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$40.75$33.97$11.92$17.34$99.90
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$10.51$18.77$6.12$9.66$28.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+64.0%+55.7%+70.3%+89.9%+55.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10080.637.160.852.640.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded978K315K368K297K1.8M
Evenly matched — IIIV and SHEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: WYFI as "Buy", IIIV as "Buy", ALLT as "Buy", SHEN as "Buy", LMND as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 86.0% upside for SHEN (target: $29) vs 5.1% for WYFI (target: $27). SHEN is the only dividend payer here at 0.75% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricWYFI logoWYFIWhiteFiber, Inc. …IIIV logoIIIVi3 Verticals, Inc.ALLT logoALLTAllot Ltd.SHEN logoSHENShenandoah Teleco…LMND logoLMNDLemonade, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$27.43$29.00$14.67$29.00$71.83
# AnalystsCovering analysts51414815
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises3
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.12
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+9.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

IIIV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). LMND leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best Overalli3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

WYFI vs IIIV vs ALLT vs SHEN vs LMND: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is WYFI or IIIV or ALLT or SHEN or LMND a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Lemonade, Inc.

(LMND) is the stronger pick with 40. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 3% for i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV). i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV) offers the better valuation at 33. 8x trailing P/E (16. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate WhiteFiber, Inc. Ordinary Shares (WYFI) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — WYFI or IIIV or ALLT or SHEN or LMND?

On trailing P/E, i3 Verticals, Inc.

(IIIV) is the cheapest at 33. 8x versus WhiteFiber, Inc. Ordinary Shares at 720. 7x. On forward P/E, i3 Verticals, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — WYFI or IIIV or ALLT or SHEN or LMND?

Over the past 5 years, WhiteFiber, Inc.

Ordinary Shares (WYFI) delivered a total return of +60. 9%, compared to -47. 8% for Allot Ltd. (ALLT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALLT returned +77. 5% versus LMND's -20. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — WYFI or IIIV or ALLT or SHEN or LMND?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), i3 Verticals, Inc.

(IIIV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 85β versus WhiteFiber, Inc. Ordinary Shares's 4. 22β — meaning WYFI is approximately 397% more volatile than IIIV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 66% for Shenandoah Telecommunications Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — WYFI or IIIV or ALLT or SHEN or LMND?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lemonade, Inc.

(LMND) is pulling ahead at 40. 2% versus -7. 3% for i3 Verticals, Inc. (IIIV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: WhiteFiber, Inc. Ordinary Shares grew EPS 211. 7% year-over-year, compared to -120. 1% for Shenandoah Telecommunications Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, LMND leads at 42. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — WYFI or IIIV or ALLT or SHEN or LMND?

i3 Verticals, Inc.

(IIIV) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 4% net margin versus -22. 4% for Lemonade, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WYFI leads at 5. 5% versus -21. 8% for LMND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALLT leads at 71. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is WYFI or IIIV or ALLT or SHEN or LMND more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, i3 Verticals, Inc.

(IIIV) trades at 16. 8x forward P/E versus 27. 2x for Allot Ltd. — 10. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHEN: 86. 0% to $29. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — WYFI or IIIV or ALLT or SHEN or LMND?

In this comparison, SHEN (0.

8% yield) pays a dividend. WYFI, IIIV, ALLT, LMND do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is WYFI or IIIV or ALLT or SHEN or LMND better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

87), 0. 8% yield). Lemonade, Inc. (LMND) carries a higher beta of 2. 68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SHEN: +17. 9%, LMND: -20. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between WYFI and IIIV and ALLT and SHEN and LMND?

These companies operate in different sectors (WYFI (Technology) and IIIV (Technology) and ALLT (Technology) and SHEN (Communication Services) and LMND (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: WYFI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IIIV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALLT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SHEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LMND is a small-cap high-growth stock. SHEN pays a dividend while WYFI, IIIV, ALLT, LMND do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

WYFI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IIIV

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ALLT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 42%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SHEN

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 22%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LMND

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 27%
  • Gross Margin > 28%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform WYFI and IIIV and ALLT and SHEN and LMND on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(WYFI: -98.6% · IIIV: -8.8%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(WYFI: 720.7x · IIIV: 33.8x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.