Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
WYFI vs SHEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
WYFI vs SHEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $776M | $898M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $51M | $266M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $-36M |
| Gross Margin | 30.9% | 37.9% |
| Operating Margin | -9.3% | -10.3% |
| Forward P/E | 560.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $13M | $642M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $27M |
Quick Verdict: WYFI vs SHEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WYFI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- EPS growth 211.7%
- 25.0% 10Y total return vs SHEN's 21.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 4.16, Low D/E 7.9%, current ratio 1.02x
SHEN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.7%
- Beta 0.89, yield 0.7%, current ratio 0.90x
- -13.7% margin vs WYFI's -17.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Quality / Margins | -13.7% margin vs WYFI's -17.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs WYFI's 4.16 | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +41.3% vs WYFI's +25.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.5% ROA vs SHEN's -2.0%, ROIC 1.7% vs -1.1% |
WYFI vs SHEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WYFI vs SHEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHEN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $266M annually — 5.3x WYFI's $51M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -13.7% (SHEN) to -17.0% (WYFI).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $51M | $266M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11M | $104M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | -$36M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$245M | -$276M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.9% | +37.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.3% | -10.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -17.0% | -13.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.8% | -103.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -98.6% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
SHEN leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SHEN's 13.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WYFI's 40.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $776M | $898M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $778M | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 560.22x | -22.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 40.67x | 13.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 16.29x | 2.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.52x | 0.92x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
WYFI leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WYFI delivers a -1.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-4 for SHEN. WYFI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SHEN's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WYFI scores 9/9 vs SHEN's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.8% | -3.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.5% | -2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.7% | -1.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | -1.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $614M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $27M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $642M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -0.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WYFI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WYFI five years ago would be worth $12,503 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,209 for SHEN. Over the past 12 months, SHEN leads with a +41.3% total return vs WYFI's +25.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WYFI at 7.7% vs SHEN's -4.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.5% | +43.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +25.0% | +41.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.0% | -13.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.0% | -27.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.0% | +21.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.7% | -4.8% |
Risk & Volatility
SHEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SHEN is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WYFI's 4.16 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHEN currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs WYFI's 49.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 4.16x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $40.75 | $17.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.51 | $9.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.8% | +93.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 75.1 | 55.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 839K | 300K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WYFI as "Buy" and SHEN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 78.7% upside for SHEN (target: $29) vs 35.3% for WYFI (target: $27). SHEN is the only dividend payer here at 0.72% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.43 | $29.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.12 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SHEN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WYFI leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
WYFI vs SHEN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WYFI or SHEN a better buy right now?
WhiteFiber, Inc.
Ordinary Shares (WYFI) offers the better valuation at 560. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate WhiteFiber, Inc. Ordinary Shares (WYFI) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — WYFI or SHEN?
Over the past 5 years, WhiteFiber, Inc.
Ordinary Shares (WYFI) delivered a total return of +25. 0%, compared to -27. 9% for Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WYFI returned +25. 0% versus SHEN's +21. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — WYFI or SHEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
89β versus WhiteFiber, Inc. Ordinary Shares's 4. 16β — meaning WYFI is approximately 370% more volatile than SHEN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WhiteFiber, Inc. Ordinary Shares (WYFI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 66% for Shenandoah Telecommunications Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — WYFI or SHEN?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: WhiteFiber, Inc.
Ordinary Shares grew EPS 211. 7% year-over-year, compared to -120. 1% for Shenandoah Telecommunications Company. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — WYFI or SHEN?
WhiteFiber, Inc.
Ordinary Shares (WYFI) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 9% net margin versus -11. 0% for Shenandoah Telecommunications Company — meaning it keeps 2. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WYFI leads at 5. 5% versus -6. 2% for SHEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SHEN leads at 26. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — WYFI or SHEN?
In this comparison, SHEN (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. WYFI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is WYFI or SHEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
89), 0. 7% yield). WhiteFiber, Inc. Ordinary Shares (WYFI) carries a higher beta of 4. 16 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SHEN: +21. 6%, WYFI: +25. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between WYFI and SHEN?
These companies operate in different sectors (WYFI (Technology) and SHEN (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
SHEN pays a dividend while WYFI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 22%
- Dividend Yield > 0.5%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.