Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
WYFI vs SHEN vs LUMN vs ADTN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
Telecommunications Services
Communication Equipment
WYFI vs SHEN vs LUMN vs ADTN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $998M | $862M | $8.93B | $1.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $51M | $266M | $12.12B | $1.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $-36M | $-1.74B | $-30M |
| Gross Margin | 30.9% | 37.9% | 35.2% | 38.6% |
| Operating Margin | -9.3% | -10.3% | -2.6% | -0.5% |
| Forward P/E | 720.7x | — | — | 27.8x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $642M | $17.71B | $245M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $27M | $1.00B | $96M |
WYFI vs SHEN vs LUMN vs ADTN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shenandoah Telecomm… (SHEN) | 100 | 29.6 | -70.4% |
| Lumen Technologies,… (LUMN) | 100 | 88.2 | -11.8% |
| ADTRAN Holdings, In… (ADTN) | 100 | 131.9 | +31.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WYFI vs SHEN vs LUMN vs ADTN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WYFI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 60.9% 10Y total return vs ADTN's -5.4%
- -1.5% ROA vs LUMN's -5.3%, ROIC 1.7% vs -0.8%
SHEN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 0.8%
- Beta 0.87, yield 0.8%, current ratio 0.90x
- Beta 0.87 vs WYFI's 4.22
- 0.8% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs LUMN's 0.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
LUMN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +97.0% vs SHEN's +30.5%
ADTN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 17.5%, EPS growth 89.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.88, Low D/E 47.2%, current ratio 1.76x
- 17.5% revenue growth vs LUMN's -5.4%
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.5% revenue growth vs LUMN's -5.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -2.6% margin vs WYFI's -17.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs WYFI's 4.22 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs LUMN's 0.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +97.0% vs SHEN's +30.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.5% ROA vs LUMN's -5.3%, ROIC 1.7% vs -0.8% |
WYFI vs SHEN vs LUMN vs ADTN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WYFI vs SHEN vs LUMN vs ADTN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SHEN leads in 2 of 6 categories
ADTN leads 1 • WYFI leads 1 • LUMN leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADTN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LUMN is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.1B annually — 239.9x WYFI's $51M. ADTN is the more profitable business, keeping -2.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WYFI's -17.0%. On growth, ADTN holds the edge at +15.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $51M | $266M | $12.1B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11M | $104M | $2.4B | $43M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | -$36M | -$1.7B | -$30M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$245M | -$276M | $5.4B | $58M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.9% | +37.9% | +35.2% | +38.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.3% | -10.3% | -2.6% | -0.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -17.0% | -13.7% | -14.3% | -2.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.8% | -103.5% | +44.9% | +5.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -98.6% | -100.0% | -8.9% | +15.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -18.2% | 0.0% | +92.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LUMN and ADTN each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, LUMN's 10.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WYFI's 52.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $998M | $862M | $8.9B | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1000M | $1.5B | $25.6B | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 720.72x | -21.96x | -4.95x | -26.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 27.81x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 52.30x | 13.48x | 9.99x | 17.71x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 20.95x | 2.41x | 0.72x | 1.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.81x | 0.89x | — | 2.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 24.07x | 12.38x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WYFI leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WYFI delivers a -1.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-79 for LUMN. WYFI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SHEN's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WYFI scores 9/9 vs SHEN's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.8% | -3.7% | -79.4% | -5.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.5% | -2.0% | -5.3% | -2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.7% | -1.1% | -0.8% | -1.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | -1.3% | -0.6% | -1.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.66x | — | 0.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $614M | $16.7B | $149M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $27M | $1.0B | $96M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $642M | $17.7B | $245M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -0.65x | -1.12x | 0.14x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LUMN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WYFI five years ago would be worth $16,085 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,126 for SHEN. Over the past 12 months, LUMN leads with a +97.0% total return vs SHEN's +30.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LUMN at 54.3% vs SHEN's -6.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +55.0% | +37.8% | +12.7% | +73.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +60.9% | +30.5% | +97.0% | +81.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.9% | -17.7% | +267.4% | +81.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.9% | -28.7% | -27.1% | -13.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.9% | +17.9% | -35.5% | -5.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.2% | -6.3% | +54.3% | +22.0% |
Risk & Volatility
SHEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SHEN is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WYFI's 4.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHEN currently trades 89.9% from its 52-week high vs WYFI's 64.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 4.22x | 0.87x | 2.83x | 1.88x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $40.75 | $17.34 | $11.95 | $18.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.51 | $9.66 | $3.37 | $7.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.0% | +89.9% | +72.6% | +80.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 80.6 | 52.6 | 48.6 | 51.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 978K | 297K | 12.2M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
SHEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WYFI as "Buy", SHEN as "Buy", LUMN as "Hold", ADTN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 86.0% upside for SHEN (target: $29) vs -10.6% for LUMN (target: $8). SHEN is the only dividend payer here at 0.75% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.43 | $29.00 | $7.75 | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 8 | 28 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% | +0.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.12 | $0.00 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SHEN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook). ADTN leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
WYFI vs SHEN vs LUMN vs ADTN: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WYFI or SHEN or LUMN or ADTN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ADTRAN Holdings, Inc.
(ADTN) is the stronger pick with 17. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN). WhiteFiber, Inc. Ordinary Shares (WYFI) offers the better valuation at 720. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate WhiteFiber, Inc. Ordinary Shares (WYFI) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — WYFI or SHEN or LUMN or ADTN?
Over the past 5 years, WhiteFiber, Inc.
Ordinary Shares (WYFI) delivered a total return of +60. 9%, compared to -28. 7% for Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WYFI returned +60. 9% versus LUMN's -35. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — WYFI or SHEN or LUMN or ADTN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
87β versus WhiteFiber, Inc. Ordinary Shares's 4. 22β — meaning WYFI is approximately 383% more volatile than SHEN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WhiteFiber, Inc. Ordinary Shares (WYFI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 66% for Shenandoah Telecommunications Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — WYFI or SHEN or LUMN or ADTN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ADTRAN Holdings, Inc.
(ADTN) is pulling ahead at 17. 5% versus -5. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: WhiteFiber, Inc. Ordinary Shares grew EPS 211. 7% year-over-year, compared to -30. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHEN leads at 12. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — WYFI or SHEN or LUMN or ADTN?
WhiteFiber, Inc.
Ordinary Shares (WYFI) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 9% net margin versus -14. 0% for Lumen Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WYFI leads at 5. 5% versus -6. 2% for SHEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LUMN leads at 46. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is WYFI or SHEN or LUMN or ADTN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHEN: 86.
0% to $29. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — WYFI or SHEN or LUMN or ADTN?
In this comparison, SHEN (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. WYFI, LUMN, ADTN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is WYFI or SHEN or LUMN or ADTN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
87), 0. 8% yield). Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) carries a higher beta of 2. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SHEN: +17. 9%, LUMN: -35. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between WYFI and SHEN and LUMN and ADTN?
These companies operate in different sectors (WYFI (Technology) and SHEN (Communication Services) and LUMN (Communication Services) and ADTN (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: WYFI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SHEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LUMN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ADTN is a small-cap high-growth stock. SHEN pays a dividend while WYFI, LUMN, ADTN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 22%
- Dividend Yield > 0.5%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.