Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
WYHG vs SENEA vs JBSS vs HAIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
WYHG vs SENEA vs JBSS vs HAIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $41M | $749M | $876M | $72M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $98.97B | $1.61B | $1.14B | $1.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6.29B | $90M | $70M | $-516M |
| Gross Margin | 29.0% | 12.6% | 19.1% | 19.3% |
| Operating Margin | 9.5% | 7.9% | 8.9% | 2.2% |
| Forward P/E | 5.3x | 10.7x | 11.4x | — |
| Total Debt | $29M | $375M | $102M | $779M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $85M | $43M | $585K | $54M |
WYHG vs SENEA vs JBSS vs HAIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wing Yip Food Holdi… (WYHG) | 100 | 20.7 | -79.3% |
| Seneca Foods Corpor… (SENEA) | 100 | 199.4 | +99.4% |
| John B. Sanfilippo … (JBSS) | 100 | 86.8 | -13.2% |
| The Hain Celestial … (HAIN) | 100 | 9.6 | -90.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: WYHG vs SENEA vs JBSS vs HAIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
WYHG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Better valuation composite
- 6.4% margin vs HAIN's -35.5%
- 30.2% ROA vs HAIN's -35.4%, ROIC 109.1% vs 2.9%
SENEA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 360.6% 10Y total return vs JBSS's 138.4%
- 8.2% revenue growth vs HAIN's -10.2%
- +53.4% vs HAIN's -57.4%
JBSS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 2.8%
- Rev growth 3.8%, EPS growth -2.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.14, Low D/E 28.3%, current ratio 2.22x
- PEG 8.09 vs SENEA's 9.51
HAIN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.2% revenue growth vs HAIN's -10.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.4% margin vs HAIN's -35.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.14 vs HAIN's 1.90, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.4% vs HAIN's -57.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 30.2% ROA vs HAIN's -35.4%, ROIC 109.1% vs 2.9% |
WYHG vs SENEA vs JBSS vs HAIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
WYHG vs SENEA vs JBSS vs HAIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WYHG leads in 2 of 6 categories
HAIN leads 1 • SENEA leads 1 • JBSS leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WYHG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WYHG is the larger business by revenue, generating $99.0B annually — 86.6x JBSS's $1.1B. WYHG is the more profitable business, keeping 6.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HAIN's -35.5%. On growth, JBSS holds the edge at +4.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $99.0B | $1.6B | $1.1B | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $14.5B | $171M | $127M | $74M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6.3B | $90M | $70M | -$516M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$16M | $168M | $33M | $42M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.0% | +12.6% | +19.1% | +19.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.5% | +7.9% | +8.9% | +2.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +5.6% | +6.2% | -35.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.0% | +10.5% | +2.9% | +2.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -99.9% | +1.1% | +4.6% | -13.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -98.9% | +2.1% | +31.9% | +21.5% |
Valuation Metrics
HAIN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.3x trailing earnings, WYHG trades at a 78% valuation discount to SENEA's 24.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JBSS offers better value at 10.57x vs SENEA's 21.73x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $41M | $749M | $876M | $72M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $41M | $1.1B | $977M | $796M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.32x | 24.37x | 14.89x | -0.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.67x | 11.41x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 21.73x | 10.57x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.41x | 8.82x | 8.41x | 8.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.32x | 0.47x | 0.79x | 0.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 358.77x | 1.58x | 2.43x | 0.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 2.51x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
WYHG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WYHG delivers a 38.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $38 in annual profit, vs $-141 for HAIN. WYHG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HAIN's 1.64x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SENEA scores 6/9 vs WYHG's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +38.0% | +12.6% | +19.5% | -140.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +30.2% | +7.4% | +11.7% | -35.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +109.1% | +5.3% | +15.2% | +2.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +89.1% | +7.1% | +20.4% | +3.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.59x | 0.28x | 1.64x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$57M | $332M | $102M | $725M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $85M | $43M | $585,000 | $54M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $29M | $375M | $102M | $779M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.25x | 6.90x | 26.02x | 0.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SENEA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SENEA five years ago would be worth $30,594 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $196 for HAIN. Over the past 12 months, SENEA leads with a +53.4% total return vs HAIN's -57.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SENEA at 43.5% vs HAIN's -60.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +45.0% | +32.9% | +9.5% | -24.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -47.4% | +53.4% | +27.1% | -57.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.8% | +195.7% | -26.0% | -93.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.8% | +205.9% | -2.8% | -98.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.8% | +360.6% | +138.4% | -98.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -42.3% | +43.5% | -9.6% | -60.3% |
Risk & Volatility
JBSS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JBSS is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HAIN's 1.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JBSS currently trades 88.0% from its 52-week high vs HAIN's 36.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 0.16x | 0.14x | 1.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.91 | $167.33 | $85.15 | $2.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.39 | $85.20 | $59.07 | $0.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +42.7% | +85.9% | +88.0% | +36.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.4 | 55.1 | 44.2 | 48.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 821K | 119K | 94K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SENEA and JBSS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JBSS as "Buy", HAIN as "Hold". JBSS is the only dividend payer here at 2.78% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $1.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 2 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | +2.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 13 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.00 | $2.08 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.5% | +0.1% | +2.0% |
WYHG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HAIN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
WYHG vs SENEA vs JBSS vs HAIN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WYHG or SENEA or JBSS or HAIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) is the stronger pick with 8.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN). Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares (WYHG) offers the better valuation at 5. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WYHG or SENEA or JBSS or HAIN?
On trailing P/E, Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares (WYHG) is the cheapest at 5.
3x versus Seneca Foods Corporation at 24. 4x. On forward P/E, Seneca Foods Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. wins at 8. 09x versus Seneca Foods Corporation's 9. 51x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — WYHG or SENEA or JBSS or HAIN?
Over the past 5 years, Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) delivered a total return of +205.
9%, compared to -98. 0% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SENEA returned +360. 6% versus HAIN's -98. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — WYHG or SENEA or JBSS or HAIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), John B.
Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 14β versus The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. 's 1. 90β — meaning HAIN is approximately 1307% more volatile than JBSS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares (WYHG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 164% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — WYHG or SENEA or JBSS or HAIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) is pulling ahead at 8.
2% versus -10. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. grew EPS -2. 3% year-over-year, compared to -601. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WYHG leads at 5. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — WYHG or SENEA or JBSS or HAIN?
Wing Yip Food Holdings Group Limited American Depositary Shares (WYHG) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
9% net margin versus -34. 0% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WYHG leads at 7. 8% versus 3. 6% for HAIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WYHG leads at 29. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is WYHG or SENEA or JBSS or HAIN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 8. 09x versus Seneca Foods Corporation's 9. 51x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 11. 4x for John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. — 0. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — WYHG or SENEA or JBSS or HAIN?
In this comparison, JBSS (2.
8% yield) pays a dividend. WYHG, SENEA, HAIN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is WYHG or SENEA or JBSS or HAIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, John B.
Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 14), 2. 8% yield, +138. 4% 10Y return). The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN) carries a higher beta of 1. 90 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JBSS: +138. 4%, HAIN: -98. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between WYHG and SENEA and JBSS and HAIN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: WYHG is a small-cap deep-value stock; SENEA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JBSS is a small-cap deep-value stock; HAIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. JBSS pays a dividend while WYHG, SENEA, HAIN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.