Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

XAGE vs HIMS vs MGRX vs WELL vs GDRX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
XAGE
Longevity Health Holdings Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7M
5Y Perf.-99.9%
HIMS
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

Medical - Equipment & Services

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$6.63B
5Y Perf.+158.7%
MGRX
Mangoceuticals, Inc.

Medical - Healthcare Information Services

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6M
5Y Perf.-98.0%
WELL
Welltower Inc.

REIT - Healthcare Facilities

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$149.25B
5Y Perf.+197.1%
GDRX
GoodRx Holdings, Inc.

Medical - Healthcare Information Services

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$973M
5Y Perf.-54.6%

XAGE vs HIMS vs MGRX vs WELL vs GDRX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
XAGE logoXAGE
HIMS logoHIMS
MGRX logoMGRX
WELL logoWELL
GDRX logoGDRX
IndustryBiotechnologyMedical - Equipment & ServicesMedical - Healthcare Information ServicesREIT - Healthcare FacilitiesMedical - Healthcare Information Services
Market Cap$7M$6.63B$6M$149.25B$973M
Revenue (TTM)$1M$2.35B$467K$11.63B$788M
Net Income (TTM)$-6M$128M$-20M$1.43B$29M
Gross Margin54.6%69.7%60.6%39.1%81.0%
Operating Margin-401.0%4.6%-41.4%4.4%12.4%
Forward P/E51.5x78.4x9.0x
Total Debt$639K$1.12B$215K$21.38B$60M
Cash & Equiv.$157K$229M$59K$5.03B$262M

XAGE vs HIMS vs MGRX vs WELL vs GDRXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

XAGE
HIMS
MGRX
WELL
GDRX
StockMar 23May 26Return
Longevity Health Ho… (XAGE)1000.1-99.9%
Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS)100258.7+158.7%
Mangoceuticals, Inc. (MGRX)1002.0-98.0%
Welltower Inc. (WELL)100297.1+197.1%
GoodRx Holdings, In… (GDRX)10045.4-54.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: XAGE vs HIMS vs MGRX vs WELL vs GDRX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: WELL leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Longevity Health Holdings Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. HIMS, MGRX, and GDRX also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
XAGE
Longevity Health Holdings Inc.
The Growth Leader

XAGE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.

  • 139.4% revenue growth vs MGRX's -15.8%
Best for: growth
HIMS
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
The Growth Play

HIMS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
  • 6.0% ROA vs XAGE's -173.9%, ROIC 10.7% vs -38.0%
Best for: growth exposure
MGRX
Mangoceuticals, Inc.
The Income Pick

MGRX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.90, yield 100.0%
  • 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs WELL's 1.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability
WELL
Welltower Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

WELL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 223.1% 10Y total return vs HIMS's 161.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 49.5%, current ratio 5.34x
  • Beta 0.13, yield 1.3%, current ratio 5.34x
  • 12.3% margin vs MGRX's -42.5%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
GDRX
GoodRx Holdings, Inc.
The Value Play

GDRX is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (9.0x vs 78.4x)
Best for: value
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthXAGE logoXAGE139.4% revenue growth vs MGRX's -15.8%
ValueGDRX logoGDRXLower P/E (9.0x vs 78.4x)
Quality / MarginsWELL logoWELL12.3% margin vs MGRX's -42.5%
Stability / SafetyWELL logoWELLBeta 0.13 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage
DividendsMGRX logoMGRX100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs WELL's 1.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)WELL logoWELL+42.7% vs XAGE's -92.6%
Efficiency (ROA)HIMS logoHIMS6.0% ROA vs XAGE's -173.9%, ROIC 10.7% vs -38.0%

XAGE vs HIMS vs MGRX vs WELL vs GDRX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

XAGELongevity Health Holdings Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

HIMSHims & Hers Health, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

MGRXMangoceuticals, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

WELLWelltower Inc.
FY 2025
Senior Housing - Operating
81.1%$8.5B
Triple Net
11.4%$1.2B
Outpatient Medical
7.5%$782M
GDRXGoodRx Holdings, Inc.
FY 2024
Prescription Transactions Revenue
84.3%$578M
Subscription Revenue
12.6%$87M
Other Revenue
3.1%$21M

XAGE vs HIMS vs MGRX vs WELL vs GDRX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLWELLLAGGINGMGRX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — WELL and GDRX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 24909.6x MGRX's $466,908. WELL is the more profitable business, keeping 12.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MGRX's -42.5%. On growth, XAGE holds the edge at +19.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricXAGE logoXAGELongevity Health …HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…MGRX logoMGRXMangoceuticals, I…WELL logoWELLWelltower Inc.GDRX logoGDRXGoodRx Holdings, …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1M$2.3B$466,908$11.6B$788M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$6M$164M-$17M$2.8B$184M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$6M$128M-$20M$1.4B$29M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$4M$73M-$6M$2.5B$132M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+54.6%+69.7%+60.6%+39.1%+81.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-4.0%+4.6%-41.4%+4.4%+12.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-3.9%+5.5%-42.5%+12.3%+3.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.6%+3.1%-12.6%+21.9%+16.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+19.8%+28.4%-36.8%+40.3%-4.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-4.9%-27.3%+30.5%+22.5%-1.3%
Evenly matched — WELL and GDRX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

GDRX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 33.3x trailing earnings, GDRX trades at a 78% valuation discount to WELL's 153.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GDRX's 4.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WELL's 66.4x.

MetricXAGE logoXAGELongevity Health …HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…MGRX logoMGRXMangoceuticals, I…WELL logoWELLWelltower Inc.GDRX logoGDRXGoodRx Holdings, …
Market CapShares × price$7M$6.6B$6M$149.2B$973M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$7M$7.5B$6M$165.6B$771M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.64x50.32x-0.08x153.25x33.29x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.51.51x78.42x8.98x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple42.68x66.40x4.01x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue133.03x2.82x9.00x13.99x1.22x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share12.25x0.05x3.35x1.65x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF89.61x52.41x5.92x
GDRX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — HIMS and GDRX each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

HIMS delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-115 for MGRX. MGRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WELL scores 7/9 vs MGRX's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricXAGE logoXAGELongevity Health …HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…MGRX logoMGRXMangoceuticals, I…WELL logoWELLWelltower Inc.GDRX logoGDRXGoodRx Holdings, …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-103.5%+23.7%-114.6%+3.5%+4.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-173.9%+6.0%-106.4%+2.3%+1.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital-38.0%+10.7%-83.8%+0.5%+13.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-47.5%+10.9%-107.8%+0.6%+8.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–944476
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.07x0.02x0.49x0.10x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$481,854$892M$156,309$16.3B-$202M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$157,139$229M$58,653$5.0B$262M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$638,993$1.1B$214,962$21.4B$60M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-293.50x-581.90x0.26x3.61x
Evenly matched — HIMS and GDRX each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

WELL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $30,234 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11 for XAGE. Over the past 12 months, WELL leads with a +42.7% total return vs XAGE's -92.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 42.5% vs XAGE's -89.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricXAGE logoXAGELongevity Health …HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…MGRX logoMGRXMangoceuticals, I…WELL logoWELLWelltower Inc.GDRX logoGDRXGoodRx Holdings, …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+6.4%-23.2%-60.1%+14.3%+3.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-92.6%-51.0%-80.8%+42.7%-25.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%+116.6%-98.1%+189.5%-38.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%+137.6%-99.4%+202.3%-91.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%+161.9%-99.4%+223.1%-94.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-89.8%+29.4%-73.4%+42.5%-14.9%
WELL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

WELL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

WELL is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WELL currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs XAGE's 3.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricXAGE logoXAGELongevity Health …HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…MGRX logoMGRXMangoceuticals, I…WELL logoWELLWelltower Inc.GDRX logoGDRXGoodRx Holdings, …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.86x2.40x0.90x0.13x1.58x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$8.27$70.43$2.75$219.59$5.81
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.23$13.74$0.27$142.65$1.77
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+3.9%+36.4%+12.4%+97.0%+48.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.554.546.360.266.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1K34.9M7.4M2.6M2.3M
WELL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — MGRX and WELL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: HIMS as "Hold", WELL as "Buy", GDRX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 15.6% upside for HIMS (target: $30) vs 6.3% for WELL (target: $227). For income investors, MGRX offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs WELL's 1.30%.

MetricXAGE logoXAGELongevity Health …HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…MGRX logoMGRXMangoceuticals, I…WELL logoWELLWelltower Inc.GDRX logoGDRXGoodRx Holdings, …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$29.67$226.50$3.19
# AnalystsCovering analysts193424
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+100.0%+1.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises121
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.41$2.76
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.4%0.0%0.0%+21.3%
Evenly matched — MGRX and WELL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

WELL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). GDRX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallWelltower Inc. (WELL)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

XAGE vs HIMS vs MGRX vs WELL vs GDRX: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is XAGE or HIMS or MGRX or WELL or GDRX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 8% for Mangoceuticals, Inc. (MGRX). GoodRx Holdings, Inc. (GDRX) offers the better valuation at 33. 3x trailing P/E (9. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Welltower Inc. (WELL) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — XAGE or HIMS or MGRX or WELL or GDRX?

On trailing P/E, GoodRx Holdings, Inc.

(GDRX) is the cheapest at 33. 3x versus Welltower Inc. at 153. 3x. On forward P/E, GoodRx Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — XAGE or HIMS or MGRX or WELL or GDRX?

Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.

(WELL) delivered a total return of +202. 3%, compared to -99. 9% for Longevity Health Holdings Inc. (XAGE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WELL returned +223. 1% versus XAGE's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — XAGE or HIMS or MGRX or WELL or GDRX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Welltower Inc.

(WELL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 13β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 40β — meaning HIMS is approximately 1707% more volatile than WELL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mangoceuticals, Inc. (MGRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — XAGE or HIMS or MGRX or WELL or GDRX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -15. 8% for Mangoceuticals, Inc. (MGRX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GoodRx Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 104. 1% year-over-year, compared to -11. 5% for Welltower Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — XAGE or HIMS or MGRX or WELL or GDRX?

Welltower Inc.

(WELL) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 8% net margin versus -206. 1% for Longevity Health Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GDRX leads at 13. 4% versus -99. 3% for XAGE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XAGE leads at 87. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is XAGE or HIMS or MGRX or WELL or GDRX more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, GoodRx Holdings, Inc.

(GDRX) trades at 9. 0x forward P/E versus 78. 4x for Welltower Inc. — 69. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HIMS: 15. 6% to $29. 67.

08

Which pays a better dividend — XAGE or HIMS or MGRX or WELL or GDRX?

In this comparison, MGRX (100.

0% yield), WELL (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. XAGE, HIMS, GDRX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is XAGE or HIMS or MGRX or WELL or GDRX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Welltower Inc.

(WELL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 13), 1. 3% yield, +223. 1% 10Y return). Longevity Health Holdings Inc. (XAGE) carries a higher beta of 1. 86 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WELL: +223. 1%, XAGE: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between XAGE and HIMS and MGRX and WELL and GDRX?

These companies operate in different sectors (XAGE (Healthcare) and HIMS (Healthcare) and MGRX (Healthcare) and WELL (Real Estate) and GDRX (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: XAGE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; MGRX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GDRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. MGRX, WELL pay a dividend while XAGE, HIMS, GDRX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

XAGE

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 987%
  • Gross Margin > 32%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HIMS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MGRX

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 36%
  • Dividend Yield > 40.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WELL

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 20%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GDRX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 48%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform XAGE and HIMS and MGRX and WELL and GDRX on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(XAGE: 1975.5% · HIMS: 28.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.