Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
XERS vs AMRX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
XERS vs AMRX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| Market Cap | $1.14B | $4.31B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $315M | $3.02B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $12M | $72M |
| Gross Margin | 59.4% | 36.9% |
| Operating Margin | 11.4% | -0.2% |
| Forward P/E | 55.3x | 13.8x |
| Total Debt | $38M | $124M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $111M | $282M |
XERS vs AMRX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xeris Biopharma Hol… (XERS) | 100 | 129.0 | +29.0% |
| Amneal Pharmaceutic… (AMRX) | 100 | 281.7 | +181.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XERS vs AMRX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XERS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.04
- Rev growth 43.7%, EPS growth 100.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.04, current ratio 2.19x
AMRX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -54.9% 10Y total return vs XERS's -67.2%
- Lower P/E (13.8x vs 55.3x)
- +90.0% vs XERS's +48.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 43.7% revenue growth vs AMRX's 8.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.8x vs 55.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.8% margin vs AMRX's 2.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.04 vs AMRX's 1.17 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +90.0% vs XERS's +48.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.2% ROA vs AMRX's 2.0%, ROIC 33.8% vs -0.2% |
XERS vs AMRX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
XERS vs AMRX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XERS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMRX is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.0B annually — 9.6x XERS's $315M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.8% (XERS) to 2.4% (AMRX). On growth, XERS holds the edge at +38.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $315M | $3.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $45M | $169M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $12M | $72M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $57M | $150M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.4% | +36.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.4% | -0.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.8% | +2.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.2% | +5.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.3% | +11.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +116.5% | +2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
AMRX leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 62.4x trailing earnings, AMRX trades at a 97% valuation discount to XERS's 2071.9x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $4.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $4.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2071.88x | 62.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 55.25x | 13.81x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 28.88x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.92x | 1.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 83.66x | 4.62x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 40.93x | 15.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
XERS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XERS delivers a 7.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $7 for AMRX. AMRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XERS's 2.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMRX scores 8/9 vs XERS's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.3% | +7.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.2% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +33.8% | -0.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.0% | -0.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.76x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$73M | -$158M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $111M | $282M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $38M | $124M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.12x | 2.09x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMRX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMRX five years ago would be worth $26,385 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20,400 for XERS. Over the past 12 months, AMRX leads with a +90.0% total return vs XERS's +48.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMRX at 89.4% vs XERS's 40.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.8% | +8.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +48.0% | +90.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +176.2% | +579.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +104.0% | +163.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.2% | -54.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +40.3% | +89.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — XERS and AMRX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XERS is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMRX's 1.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMRX currently trades 90.3% from its 52-week high vs XERS's 65.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 1.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.08 | $15.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.30 | $7.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.8% | +90.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.7 | 62.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.8M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates XERS as "Buy" and AMRX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 35.7% upside for XERS (target: $9) vs 23.9% for AMRX (target: $17).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.00 | $17.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | 0.0% |
XERS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AMRX leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
XERS vs AMRX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XERS or AMRX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc.
(XERS) is the stronger pick with 43. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 0% for Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMRX). Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMRX) offers the better valuation at 62. 4x trailing P/E (13. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. (XERS) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XERS or AMRX?
On trailing P/E, Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(AMRX) is the cheapest at 62. 4x versus Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. at 2071. 9x. On forward P/E, Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XERS or AMRX?
Over the past 5 years, Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(AMRX) delivered a total return of +163. 8%, compared to +104. 0% for Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. (XERS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMRX returned -54. 9% versus XERS's -67. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XERS or AMRX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc.
(XERS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 04β versus Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 1. 17β — meaning AMRX is approximately 13% more volatile than XERS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 3% for Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XERS or AMRX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc.
(XERS) is pulling ahead at 43. 7% versus 8. 0% for Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMRX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 157. 9% year-over-year, compared to 100. 9% for Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, XERS leads at 38. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XERS or AMRX?
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(AMRX) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 4% net margin versus 0. 2% for Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XERS leads at 8. 5% versus -0. 2% for AMRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XERS leads at 81. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XERS or AMRX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(AMRX) trades at 13. 8x forward P/E versus 55. 3x for Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc. — 41. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for XERS: 35. 7% to $9. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — XERS or AMRX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is XERS or AMRX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Xeris Biopharma Holdings, Inc.
(XERS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 04)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (XERS: -67. 2%, AMRX: -54. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XERS and AMRX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: XERS is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.