Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
XHG vs XTIA vs BTBT vs GFAI vs FTFT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Financial - Capital Markets
Security & Protection Services
Software - Application
XHG vs XTIA vs BTBT vs GFAI vs FTFT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | Aerospace & Defense | Financial - Capital Markets | Security & Protection Services | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $11M | $416K | $577M | $12M | $8M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $376M | $5M | $164M | $72M | $4M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-609M | $-61M | $137M | $-24M | $-5M |
| Gross Margin | 4.2% | 53.5% | 61.9% | 15.1% | 10.7% |
| Operating Margin | -245.5% | -9.5% | 16.8% | -27.4% | -8.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 8.9x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $1.10B | $3M | $14M | $3M | $2M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $4M | $95M | $22M | $2M |
XHG vs XTIA vs BTBT vs GFAI vs FTFT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| XChange TEC.INC (XHG) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| XTI Aerospace, Inc. (XTIA) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) | 100 | 9.2 | -90.8% |
| Guardforce AI Co., … (GFAI) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
| Future FinTech Grou… (FTFT) | 100 | 0.6 | -99.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XHG vs XTIA vs BTBT vs GFAI vs FTFT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XHG plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
XTIA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.07
- Lower volatility, beta 1.07, Low D/E 46.7%, current ratio 0.49x
- Beta 1.07, current ratio 0.49x
- Beta 1.07 vs BTBT's 3.37
BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
- -61.3% 10Y total return vs FTFT's -98.6%
- 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs XHG's -78.6%
- 17.3% margin vs XTIA's -13.3%
GFAI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, FTFT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs XHG's -78.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.3% margin vs XTIA's -13.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.07 vs BTBT's 3.37 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +38.6% vs XHG's -57.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.0% ROA vs XHG's -5.3%, ROIC 6.5% vs -82.4% |
XHG vs XTIA vs BTBT vs GFAI vs FTFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
XHG vs XTIA vs BTBT vs GFAI vs FTFT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BTBT leads in 3 of 6 categories
XTIA leads 1 • XHG leads 0 • GFAI leads 0 • FTFT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XHG is the larger business by revenue, generating $376M annually — 98.2x FTFT's $4M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XTIA's -13.3%. On growth, XTIA holds the edge at +170.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $376M | $5M | $164M | $72M | $4M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$923M | -$43M | $166M | -$12M | -$34M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$609M | -$61M | $137M | -$24M | -$5M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$43M | -$39M | -$448M | -$6M | $56.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +53.5% | +61.9% | +15.1% | +10.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | -9.5% | +16.8% | -27.4% | -8.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -161.9% | -13.3% | +17.3% | -32.9% | -120.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -11.5% | -8.4% | -65.3% | -8.8% | +14767.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.5% | +170.6% | — | +3.6% | +110.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +75.5% | +98.2% | +2.8% | +38.9% | +100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
XTIA leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11M | $415,763 | $577M | $12M | $8M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $171M | -$617,237 | $495M | -$8M | $7M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.33x | -0.01x | 8.95x | -1.00x | -0.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 8.27x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.26x | 0.13x | 3.52x | 0.32x | 2.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.06x | 0.55x | 0.18x | 0.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-5 for XTIA. BTBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XTIA's 0.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs XTIA's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -5.0% | +21.4% | -69.7% | -16.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.3% | -127.3% | +19.0% | -50.2% | -11.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -82.4% | -177.5% | +6.5% | -41.6% | -97.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -5.4% | +8.5% | -19.1% | -117.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.47x | 0.03x | 0.08x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | -$1M | -$81M | -$19M | -$457,223 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $4M | $95M | $22M | $2M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $3M | $14M | $3M | $2M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -22.56x | -74.17x | — | -167.24x | -228.78x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BTBT five years ago would be worth $1,495 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for XTIA. Over the past 12 months, XTIA leads with a +38.6% total return vs XHG's -57.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BTBT at -8.8% vs XHG's -95.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.8% | +28.0% | -12.3% | -17.3% | +104.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -57.4% | +38.6% | -9.6% | -47.5% | +0.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -100.0% | -24.2% | -92.7% | -88.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -100.0% | -85.0% | -99.5% | -99.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -100.0% | -61.3% | -99.5% | -98.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -95.9% | -94.0% | -8.8% | -58.1% | -51.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — XTIA and BTBT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XTIA is the less volatile stock with a 1.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BTBT currently trades 39.3% from its 52-week high vs XTIA's 24.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.73x | 1.07x | 3.37x | 2.31x | 2.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.23 | $7.43 | $4.55 | $1.50 | $4.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.68 | $1.22 | $1.25 | $0.38 | $0.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +31.9% | +24.6% | +39.3% | +35.3% | +38.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.3 | 42.7 | 58.8 | 54.2 | 53.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 22K | 2.1M | 18.2M | 536K | 103K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — XTIA and FTFT each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.32% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $5.00 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 2 | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.3% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.01 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BTBT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). XTIA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
XHG vs XTIA vs BTBT vs GFAI vs FTFT: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XHG or XTIA or BTBT or GFAI or FTFT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -29. 8% for XTI Aerospace, Inc. (XTIA). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 8. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — XHG or XTIA or BTBT or GFAI or FTFT?
Over the past 5 years, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) delivered a total return of -85. 0%, compared to -100. 0% for XTI Aerospace, Inc. (XTIA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BTBT returned -61. 3% versus XHG's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — XHG or XTIA or BTBT or GFAI or FTFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), XTI Aerospace, Inc.
(XTIA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 07β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning BTBT is approximately 216% more volatile than XTIA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 47% for XTI Aerospace, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — XHG or XTIA or BTBT or GFAI or FTFT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -29. 8% for XTI Aerospace, Inc. (XTIA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to 85. 2% for Future FinTech Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GFAI leads at 1. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — XHG or XTIA or BTBT or GFAI or FTFT?
Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -1111. 9% for XTI Aerospace, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at 16. 8% versus -1154. 9% for XTIA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTBT leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — XHG or XTIA or BTBT or GFAI or FTFT?
In this comparison, BTBT (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. XHG, XTIA, GFAI, FTFT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is XHG or XTIA or BTBT or GFAI or FTFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, XTI Aerospace, Inc.
(XTIA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 07)). Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a higher beta of 2. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (XTIA: -100. 0%, GFAI: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between XHG and XTIA and BTBT and GFAI and FTFT?
These companies operate in different sectors (XHG (Real Estate) and XTIA (Industrials) and BTBT (Financial Services) and GFAI (Industrials) and FTFT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: XHG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; XTIA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; GFAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FTFT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.