Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

XNCR vs IMVT vs RCUS vs ABBV

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
XNCR
Xencor, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$903M
5Y Perf.-59.3%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.53B
5Y Perf.+6.1%
RCUS
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.50B
5Y Perf.-20.9%
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - General

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$358.42B
5Y Perf.+118.7%

XNCR vs IMVT vs RCUS vs ABBV — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
XNCR logoXNCR
IMVT logoIMVT
RCUS logoRCUS
ABBV logoABBV
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyDrug Manufacturers - General
Market Cap$903M$5.53B$2.50B$358.42B
Revenue (TTM)$93M$0.00$236M$61.16B
Net Income (TTM)$-172M$-464M$-369M$4.23B
Gross Margin94.4%90.7%70.2%
Operating Margin-144.7%-168.6%26.7%
Forward P/E14.3x
Total Debt$188M$98K$99M$69.07B
Cash & Equiv.$54M$714M$222M$5.23B

XNCR vs IMVT vs RCUS vs ABBVLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

XNCR
IMVT
RCUS
ABBV
StockMay 20May 26Return
Xencor, Inc. (XNCR)10040.7-59.3%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)100106.1+6.1%
Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS)10079.1-20.9%
AbbVie Inc. (ABBV)100218.7+118.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: XNCR vs IMVT vs RCUS vs ABBV

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ABBV leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Xencor, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. RCUS also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
XNCR
Xencor, Inc.
The Growth Play

XNCR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 13.7%, EPS growth 65.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -8.6%
  • 13.7% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3%
Best for: growth exposure
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.37, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 11.16x
  • Beta 1.37, current ratio 11.16x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
RCUS
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

RCUS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +209.6% vs ABBV's +11.3%
Best for: momentum
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
The Income Pick

ABBV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.34, yield 3.2%
  • 295.5% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 173.6%
  • 6.9% margin vs XNCR's -185.7%
  • Beta 0.34 vs XNCR's 1.99
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthXNCR logoXNCR13.7% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3%
Quality / MarginsABBV logoABBV6.9% margin vs XNCR's -185.7%
Stability / SafetyABBV logoABBVBeta 0.34 vs XNCR's 1.99
DividendsABBV logoABBV3.2% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)RCUS logoRCUS+209.6% vs ABBV's +11.3%
Efficiency (ROA)ABBV logoABBV3.1% ROA vs IMVT's -44.1%

XNCR vs IMVT vs RCUS vs ABBV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

XNCRXencor, Inc.
FY 2025
Royalty
63.9%$80M
Milestone
36.1%$45M
IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

RCUSArcus Biosciences, Inc.
FY 2025
License And Development Services
87.4%$221M
Development Services
6.7%$17M
R&D Services
3.2%$8M
License
2.8%$7M
ABBVAbbVie Inc.
FY 2025
SKYRIZI
30.2%$17.6B
RINVOQ
14.3%$8.3B
H U M I R A
7.8%$4.5B
Botox Therapeutic
6.5%$3.8B
Vraylar
6.2%$3.6B
Imbruvica
4.9%$2.9B
VENCLEXTA
4.8%$2.8B
Other (14)
25.3%$14.7B

XNCR vs IMVT vs RCUS vs ABBV — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLABBVLAGGINGRCUS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ABBV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

ABBV and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $61.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. ABBV is the more profitable business, keeping 6.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XNCR's -185.7%. On growth, ABBV holds the edge at +10.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricXNCR logoXNCRXencor, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$93M$0$236M$61.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$127M-$487M-$391M$24.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$172M-$464M-$369M$4.2B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$189M-$423M-$489M$18.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+94.4%+90.7%+70.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-144.7%-168.6%+26.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-185.7%-156.4%+6.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.0%-2.1%+30.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-100.0%-39.3%+10.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-159.1%+19.7%+10.5%+57.4%
ABBV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — XNCR and IMVT and ABBV each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricXNCR logoXNCRXencor, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.
Market CapShares × price$903M$5.5B$2.5B$358.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.0B$4.8B$2.4B$422.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-9.93x-9.97x-7.54x85.50x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.28x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.96x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue7.19x10.11x5.86x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.44x5.83x4.22x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF20.12x
Evenly matched — XNCR and IMVT and ABBV each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ABBV leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-69 for RCUS. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XNCR's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ABBV scores 6/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricXNCR logoXNCRXencor, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-23.7%-47.1%-69.0%+62.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-20.5%-44.1%-35.3%+3.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-16.3%-64.1%+23.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-21.6%-66.1%-42.1%+21.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93206
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.30x0.00x0.16x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$134M-$714M-$123M$63.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$54M$714M$222M$5.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$188M$98,000$99M$69.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.98x-13.38x3.28x
ABBV leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ABBV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ABBV five years ago would be worth $20,131 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,108 for XNCR. Over the past 12 months, RCUS leads with a +209.6% total return vs ABBV's +11.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ABBV at 14.6% vs XNCR's -23.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricXNCR logoXNCRXencor, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-17.5%+5.1%+6.5%-10.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+54.1%+96.1%+209.6%+11.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-55.0%+40.9%+24.9%+50.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-68.9%+62.4%-18.6%+101.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+4.5%+173.6%+45.9%+295.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-23.4%+12.1%+7.7%+14.6%
ABBV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — IMVT and ABBV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ABBV is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than XNCR's 1.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 90.5% from its 52-week high vs XNCR's 65.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricXNCR logoXNCRXencor, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.99x1.37x1.95x0.34x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$18.69$30.09$28.72$244.81
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$6.92$13.36$7.06$176.57
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+65.9%+90.5%+86.3%+82.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.760.260.546.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded865K1.4M1.2M5.8M
Evenly matched — IMVT and ABBV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: XNCR as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy", ABBV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 162.6% upside for XNCR (target: $32) vs 21.0% for RCUS (target: $30). ABBV is the only dividend payer here at 3.24% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricXNCR logoXNCRXencor, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$32.33$45.50$30.00$256.64
# AnalystsCovering analysts27231841
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises13
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$6.57
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.3%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ABBV leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.

Best OverallAbbVie Inc. (ABBV)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

XNCR vs IMVT vs RCUS vs ABBV: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is XNCR or IMVT or RCUS or ABBV a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Xencor, Inc.

(XNCR) is the stronger pick with 13. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) offers the better valuation at 85. 5x trailing P/E (14. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Xencor, Inc. (XNCR) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — XNCR or IMVT or RCUS or ABBV?

Over the past 5 years, AbbVie Inc.

(ABBV) delivered a total return of +101. 3%, compared to -68. 9% for Xencor, Inc. (XNCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABBV returned +295. 5% versus XNCR's +4. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — XNCR or IMVT or RCUS or ABBV?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AbbVie Inc.

(ABBV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus Xencor, Inc. 's 1. 99β — meaning XNCR is approximately 489% more volatile than ABBV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 30% for Xencor, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — XNCR or IMVT or RCUS or ABBV?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Xencor, Inc.

(XNCR) is pulling ahead at 13. 7% versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Xencor, Inc. grew EPS 65. 4% year-over-year, compared to -45. 2% for Immunovant, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCUS leads at 30. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — XNCR or IMVT or RCUS or ABBV?

AbbVie Inc.

(ABBV) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 9% net margin versus -142. 9% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABBV leads at 32. 8% versus -156. 3% for RCUS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCUS leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is XNCR or IMVT or RCUS or ABBV more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for XNCR: 162.

6% to $32. 33.

07

Which pays a better dividend — XNCR or IMVT or RCUS or ABBV?

In this comparison, ABBV (3.

2% yield) pays a dividend. XNCR, IMVT, RCUS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is XNCR or IMVT or RCUS or ABBV better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.

(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34), 3. 2% yield, +295. 5% 10Y return). Xencor, Inc. (XNCR) carries a higher beta of 1. 99 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +295. 5%, XNCR: +4. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between XNCR and IMVT and RCUS and ABBV?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: XNCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ABBV is a large-cap income-oriented stock. ABBV pays a dividend while XNCR, IMVT, RCUS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

XNCR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 56%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IMVT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RCUS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 54%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ABBV

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.