XOMA vs OMAB vs RPRX vs PAC

For growth investors, XOMA Royalty Corp.

(XOMA) is the stronger pick with 83. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 1% for Royalty Pharma plc (RPRX). Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) offers the better valuation at 16. 7x trailing P/E (0. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate XOMA Royalty Corp. (XOMA) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.

A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) is the cheapest at 16. 7x versus XOMA Royalty Corp. at 28. 3x. On forward P/E, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. is actually cheaper at 0. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. wins at 0. 02x versus XOMA Royalty Corp. 's 2. 75x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.

A. B. de C. V. (PAC) delivered a total return of +166. 2%, compared to +30. 0% for XOMA Royalty Corp. (XOMA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PAC returned +219. 5% versus RPRX's +22. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Royalty Pharma plc (RPRX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

45β versus XOMA Royalty Corp. 's 1. 21β — meaning XOMA is approximately 167% more volatile than RPRX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Royalty Pharma plc (RPRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 92% versus 188% for Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S. A. B. de C. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), XOMA Royalty Corp.

(XOMA) is pulling ahead at 83. 1% versus 5. 1% for Royalty Pharma plc (RPRX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: XOMA Royalty Corp. grew EPS 188. 5% year-over-year, compared to -5. 8% for Royalty Pharma plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, XOMA leads at 105. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

XOMA Royalty Corp.

(XOMA) is the more profitable company, earning 60. 8% net margin versus 30. 7% for Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S. A. B. de C. V. — meaning it keeps 60. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RPRX leads at 65. 6% versus 21. 8% for XOMA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RPRX leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 02x versus XOMA Royalty Corp. 's 2. 75x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) trades at 0. 8x forward P/E versus 36. 7x for XOMA Royalty Corp. — 36. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for XOMA: 30. 2% to $53. 75.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S. A. B. de C. V. (OMAB) offers the highest yield at 5. 0%, versus 0. 7% for XOMA Royalty Corp. (XOMA).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.

A. B. de C. V. (PAC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 59), 3. 9% yield, +219. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PAC: +219. 5%, XOMA: +186. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (XOMA (Healthcare) and OMAB (Industrials) and RPRX (Healthcare) and PAC (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: XOMA is a small-cap high-growth stock; OMAB is a small-cap deep-value stock; RPRX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PAC is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.