Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
XOMA vs RCUS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
XOMA vs RCUS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $490M | $2.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $52M | $236M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $29M | $-369M |
| Gross Margin | 94.3% | 90.7% |
| Operating Margin | 21.8% | -168.6% |
| Forward P/E | 36.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $132M | $99M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $83M | $222M |
XOMA vs RCUS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMA Royalty Corp. (XOMA) | 100 | 200.2 | +100.2% |
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 79.1 | -20.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XOMA vs RCUS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XOMA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.21, yield 0.7%
- Rev growth 83.1%, EPS growth 188.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 105.3%
- 186.7% 10Y total return vs RCUS's 45.9%
RCUS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +209.6% vs XOMA's +68.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 83.1% revenue growth vs RCUS's -4.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 56.4% margin vs RCUS's -156.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.21 vs RCUS's 1.95 | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +209.6% vs XOMA's +68.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.1% ROA vs RCUS's -35.3%, ROIC 7.4% vs -64.1% |
XOMA vs RCUS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
XOMA vs RCUS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XOMA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RCUS is the larger business by revenue, generating $236M annually — 4.5x XOMA's $52M. XOMA is the more profitable business, keeping 56.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RCUS's -156.4%. On growth, XOMA holds the edge at +57.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $52M | $236M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $14M | -$391M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $29M | -$369M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | -$489M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +94.3% | +90.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.8% | -168.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +56.4% | -156.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | -2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.9% | -39.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +157.8% | +10.5% |
Valuation Metrics
RCUS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $490M | $2.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $538M | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 28.28x | -7.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 36.74x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.12x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 37.50x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.39x | 10.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.85x | 4.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 170.55x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
XOMA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XOMA delivers a 31.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-69 for RCUS. RCUS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XOMA's 1.57x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), XOMA scores 5/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +31.9% | -69.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.1% | -35.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.4% | -64.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.2% | -42.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 0 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.57x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $49M | -$123M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $83M | $222M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $132M | $99M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.90x | -13.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XOMA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XOMA five years ago would be worth $13,005 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,143 for RCUS. Over the past 12 months, RCUS leads with a +209.6% total return vs XOMA's +68.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XOMA at 31.3% vs RCUS's 7.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +47.5% | +6.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +68.7% | +209.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +126.1% | +24.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.0% | -18.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +186.7% | +45.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.3% | +7.7% |
Risk & Volatility
XOMA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XOMA is the less volatile stock with a 1.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCUS's 1.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. XOMA currently trades 96.4% from its 52-week high vs RCUS's 86.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.21x | 1.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $42.81 | $28.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.29 | $7.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.4% | +86.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.1 | 60.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 242K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates XOMA as "Buy" and RCUS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.2% upside for XOMA (target: $54) vs 21.0% for RCUS (target: $30). XOMA is the only dividend payer here at 0.74% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $53.75 | $30.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.30 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.3% | 0.0% |
XOMA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RCUS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
XOMA vs RCUS: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XOMA or RCUS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, XOMA Royalty Corp.
(XOMA) is the stronger pick with 83. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). XOMA Royalty Corp. (XOMA) offers the better valuation at 28. 3x trailing P/E (36. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate XOMA Royalty Corp. (XOMA) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — XOMA or RCUS?
Over the past 5 years, XOMA Royalty Corp.
(XOMA) delivered a total return of +30. 0%, compared to -18. 6% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XOMA returned +186. 7% versus RCUS's +45. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — XOMA or RCUS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), XOMA Royalty Corp.
(XOMA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 21β versus Arcus Biosciences, Inc. 's 1. 95β — meaning RCUS is approximately 61% more volatile than XOMA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 157% for XOMA Royalty Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — XOMA or RCUS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), XOMA Royalty Corp.
(XOMA) is pulling ahead at 83. 1% versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: XOMA Royalty Corp. grew EPS 188. 5% year-over-year, compared to -4. 8% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, XOMA leads at 105. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — XOMA or RCUS?
XOMA Royalty Corp.
(XOMA) is the more profitable company, earning 60. 8% net margin versus -142. 9% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 60. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XOMA leads at 21. 8% versus -156. 3% for RCUS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCUS leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is XOMA or RCUS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for XOMA: 30.
2% to $53. 75.
07Which pays a better dividend — XOMA or RCUS?
In this comparison, XOMA (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. RCUS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is XOMA or RCUS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, XOMA Royalty Corp.
(XOMA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 21), 0. 7% yield, +186. 7% 10Y return). Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a higher beta of 1. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOMA: +186. 7%, RCUS: +45. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between XOMA and RCUS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: XOMA is a small-cap high-growth stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. XOMA pays a dividend while RCUS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.