Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

XPL vs CDE vs HL vs USAS vs PAAS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
XPL
Solitario Zinc Corp.

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsAMEX • US
Market Cap$79M
5Y Perf.+175.5%
CDE
Coeur Mining, Inc.

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$11.63B
5Y Perf.+215.0%
HL
Hecla Mining Company

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.13B
5Y Perf.+444.8%
USAS
Americas Gold and Silver Corporation

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsAMEX • CA
Market Cap$2.03B
5Y Perf.+28.6%
PAAS
Pan American Silver Corp.

Silver

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$24.36B
5Y Perf.+97.3%

XPL vs CDE vs HL vs USAS vs PAAS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
XPL logoXPL
CDE logoCDE
HL logoHL
USAS logoUSAS
PAAS logoPAAS
IndustryIndustrial MaterialsGoldGoldIndustrial MaterialsSilver
Market Cap$79M$11.63B$12.13B$2.03B$24.36B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$2.57B$1.57B$109M$4.02B
Net Income (TTM)$-4M$799M$559M$-61M$1.27B
Gross Margin35.4%50.9%3.3%43.8%
Operating Margin39.4%44.1%-25.5%37.9%
Forward P/E9.1x19.1x26.3x12.4x
Total Debt$7K$365M$299M$24M$935M
Cash & Equiv.$82K$554M$242M$20M$1.21B

XPL vs CDE vs HL vs USAS vs PAASLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

XPL
CDE
HL
USAS
PAAS
StockMay 20May 26Return
Solitario Zinc Corp. (XPL)100275.5+175.5%
Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE)100315.0+215.0%
Hecla Mining Company (HL)100544.8+444.8%
Americas Gold and S… (USAS)100128.6+28.6%
Pan American Silver… (PAAS)100197.3+97.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: XPL vs CDE vs HL vs USAS vs PAAS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CDE and HL are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Hecla Mining Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. PAAS and USAS also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
XPL
Solitario Zinc Corp.
The Defensive Pick

XPL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.97, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 37.26x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
CDE
Coeur Mining, Inc.
The Growth Play

CDE has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and valuation efficiency.

  • Rev growth 96.4%, EPS growth 5.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.1%
  • PEG 0.17 vs PAAS's 0.49
  • 96.4% revenue growth vs USAS's 5.3%
  • Lower P/E (9.1x vs 12.4x), PEG 0.17 vs 0.49
Best for: growth exposure and valuation efficiency
HL
Hecla Mining Company
The Long-Run Compounder

HL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 360.6% 10Y total return vs PAAS's 326.1%
  • 35.6% margin vs USAS's -56.2%
  • 16.3% ROA vs USAS's -26.1%, ROIC 15.3% vs -26.3%
Best for: long-term compounding
USAS
Americas Gold and Silver Corporation
The Momentum Pick

USAS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +418.7% vs XPL's +41.1%
Best for: momentum
PAAS
Pan American Silver Corp.
The Income Pick

PAAS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 0.8%
  • Beta 0.74, yield 0.8%, current ratio 2.69x
  • Beta 0.74 vs USAS's 2.31, lower leverage
  • 0.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs HL's 0.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCDE logoCDE96.4% revenue growth vs USAS's 5.3%
ValueCDE logoCDELower P/E (9.1x vs 12.4x), PEG 0.17 vs 0.49
Quality / MarginsHL logoHL35.6% margin vs USAS's -56.2%
Stability / SafetyPAAS logoPAASBeta 0.74 vs USAS's 2.31, lower leverage
DividendsPAAS logoPAAS0.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs HL's 0.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)USAS logoUSAS+418.7% vs XPL's +41.1%
Efficiency (ROA)HL logoHL16.3% ROA vs USAS's -26.1%, ROIC 15.3% vs -26.3%

XPL vs CDE vs HL vs USAS vs PAAS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

XPLSolitario Zinc Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

CDECoeur Mining, Inc.
FY 2025
Gold
64.9%$1.3B
Product, Silver
35.1%$726M
HLHecla Mining Company
FY 2024
Silver Contracts
43.5%$414M
Gold
33.5%$318M
Zinc
13.8%$131M
Lead
9.2%$87M
Copper
0.0%$416,000
USASAmericas Gold and Silver Corporation
FY 2023
Silver
49.0%$62M
Zinc
30.2%$38M
Lead
20.0%$25M
Other by-products
0.8%$1M
PAASPan American Silver Corp.
FY 2025
Refined Silver and Gold
81.0%$2.9B
Lead Concentrate
10.5%$379M
Zinc Concentrate
4.2%$153M
Silver Concentrate
2.8%$101M
Copper Concentrate
1.5%$56M

XPL vs CDE vs HL vs USAS vs PAAS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCDELAGGINGHL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — CDE and HL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

PAAS and XPL operate at a comparable scale, with $4.0B and $0 in trailing revenue. HL is the more profitable business, keeping 35.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to USAS's -56.2%. On growth, CDE holds the edge at +137.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricXPL logoXPLSolitario Zinc Co…CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…USAS logoUSASAmericas Gold and…PAAS logoPAASPan American Silv…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$2.6B$1.6B$109M$4.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$4M$1.2B$853M-$7M$2.0B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$4M$799M$559M-$61M$1.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$3M$915M$472M-$52M$1.4B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+35.4%+50.9%+3.3%+43.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+39.4%+44.1%-25.5%+37.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+31.1%+35.6%-56.2%+31.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+35.6%+30.0%-47.7%+34.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+137.8%+57.4%+45.6%+49.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.9%-160.0%+55.3%+134.8%
Evenly matched — CDE and HL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CDE leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 20.1x trailing earnings, CDE trades at a 45% valuation discount to HL's 36.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CDE offers better value at 0.39x vs PAAS's 0.88x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricXPL logoXPLSolitario Zinc Co…CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…USAS logoUSASAmericas Gold and…PAAS logoPAASPan American Silv…
Market CapShares × price$79M$11.6B$12.1B$2.0B$24.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$79M$11.4B$12.2B$2.0B$24.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-19.48x20.13x36.92x-15.19x22.15x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.10x19.07x26.30x12.39x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.39x0.88x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.19x17.25x14.00x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.62x8.53x20.24x6.61x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.03x3.56x4.58x12.65x3.16x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF17.48x39.11x22.52x
CDE leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — CDE and HL each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

HL delivers a 22.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-122 for USAS. XPL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to USAS's 0.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HL scores 8/9 vs USAS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricXPL logoXPLSolitario Zinc Co…CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…USAS logoUSASAmericas Gold and…PAAS logoPAASPan American Silv…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-15.1%+15.2%+22.5%-122.1%+19.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-14.8%+11.2%+16.3%-26.1%+14.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital-14.1%+23.5%+15.3%-26.3%+15.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-18.7%+23.9%+16.8%-21.6%+15.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–946837
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x0.11x0.12x0.45x0.13x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$75,000-$188M$57M$4M-$277M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$82,000$554M$242M$20M$1.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$7,000$365M$299M$24M$935M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense47.33x19.04x-18.89x23.79x
Evenly matched — CDE and HL each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

USAS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HL five years ago would be worth $25,033 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,625 for XPL. Over the past 12 months, USAS leads with a +418.7% total return vs XPL's +41.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors USAS at 80.8% vs XPL's 12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricXPL logoXPLSolitario Zinc Co…CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…USAS logoUSASAmericas Gold and…PAAS logoPAASPan American Silv…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+26.6%+3.2%-4.1%+24.9%+13.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+41.1%+216.1%+271.0%+418.7%+137.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+42.1%+414.6%+194.9%+490.7%+229.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+26.2%+96.0%+150.3%+35.7%+71.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+64.0%+149.9%+360.6%-5.1%+326.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+12.4%+72.6%+43.4%+80.8%+48.9%
USAS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — XPL and PAAS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

PAAS is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than USAS's 2.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. XPL currently trades 88.2% from its 52-week high vs HL's 52.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricXPL logoXPLSolitario Zinc Co…CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…USAS logoUSASAmericas Gold and…PAAS logoPAASPan American Silv…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.97x1.81x1.26x2.31x0.74x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$0.98$27.77$34.17$10.50$69.99
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.54$5.55$4.68$1.06$22.08
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+88.2%+65.2%+52.9%+60.8%+82.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10051.149.346.656.354.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded308K22.2M15.4M5.8M6.2M
Evenly matched — XPL and PAAS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

PAAS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CDE as "Buy", HL as "Hold", USAS as "Buy", PAAS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.1% upside for CDE (target: $29) vs 29.7% for PAAS (target: $75). PAAS is the only dividend payer here at 0.81% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricXPL logoXPLSolitario Zinc Co…CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…USAS logoUSASAmericas Gold and…PAAS logoPAASPan American Silv…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$29.00$23.83$9.75$75.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts2126424
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.1%+0.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises002
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.01$0.47
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.1%+0.0%0.0%+0.2%
PAAS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CDE leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). USAS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.

Best OverallCoeur Mining, Inc. (CDE)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

XPL vs CDE vs HL vs USAS vs PAAS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is XPL or CDE or HL or USAS or PAAS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is the stronger pick with 96. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 3% for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation (USAS). Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) offers the better valuation at 20. 1x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — XPL or CDE or HL or USAS or PAAS?

On trailing P/E, Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is the cheapest at 20. 1x versus Hecla Mining Company at 36. 9x. On forward P/E, Coeur Mining, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Coeur Mining, Inc. wins at 0. 17x versus Pan American Silver Corp. 's 0. 49x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — XPL or CDE or HL or USAS or PAAS?

Over the past 5 years, Hecla Mining Company (HL) delivered a total return of +150.

3%, compared to +26. 2% for Solitario Zinc Corp. (XPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HL returned +360. 6% versus USAS's -5. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — XPL or CDE or HL or USAS or PAAS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pan American Silver Corp.

(PAAS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Americas Gold and Silver Corporation's 2. 31β — meaning USAS is approximately 213% more volatile than PAAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Solitario Zinc Corp. (XPL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 45% for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — XPL or CDE or HL or USAS or PAAS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is pulling ahead at 96. 4% versus 5. 3% for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation (USAS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hecla Mining Company grew EPS 765. 7% year-over-year, compared to -5. 0% for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CDE leads at 38. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — XPL or CDE or HL or USAS or PAAS?

Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 3% net margin versus -44. 9% for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation — meaning it keeps 28. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HL leads at 37. 5% versus -26. 2% for USAS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HL leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is XPL or CDE or HL or USAS or PAAS more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 17x versus Pan American Silver Corp. 's 0. 49x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 26. 3x for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation — 17. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CDE: 60. 1% to $29. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — XPL or CDE or HL or USAS or PAAS?

In this comparison, PAAS (0.

8% yield) pays a dividend. XPL, CDE, HL, USAS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is XPL or CDE or HL or USAS or PAAS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Pan American Silver Corp.

(PAAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 0. 8% yield, +326. 1% 10Y return). Americas Gold and Silver Corporation (USAS) carries a higher beta of 2. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PAAS: +326. 1%, USAS: -5. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between XPL and CDE and HL and USAS and PAAS?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: XPL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CDE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; USAS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PAAS is a mid-cap high-growth stock. PAAS pays a dividend while XPL, CDE, HL, USAS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

XPL

Quality Business

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CDE

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 68%
  • Net Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 28%
  • Net Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

USAS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PAAS

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 24%
  • Net Margin > 19%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.