Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

XPON vs BEEM vs CBAT vs NRGV

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
XPON
Expion360 Inc.

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$419K
5Y Perf.-99.8%
BEEM
Beam Global

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$35M
5Y Perf.-88.0%
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$71M
5Y Perf.-28.8%
NRGV
Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.

Renewable Utilities

UtilitiesNYSE • US
Market Cap$784M
5Y Perf.-67.4%

XPON vs BEEM vs CBAT vs NRGV — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
XPON logoXPON
BEEM logoBEEM
CBAT logoCBAT
NRGV logoNRGV
IndustryElectrical Equipment & PartsSolarElectrical Equipment & PartsRenewable Utilities
Market Cap$419K$35M$71M$784M
Revenue (TTM)$9M$28M$162M$217M
Net Income (TTM)$-2M$-29M$-7M$-115M
Gross Margin21.8%15.0%10.8%22.1%
Operating Margin-70.9%-108.4%-10.5%-35.8%
Forward P/E6.1x
Total Debt$1M$2M$30M$95M
Cash & Equiv.$548K$5M$7M$58M

XPON vs BEEM vs CBAT vs NRGVLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

XPON
BEEM
CBAT
NRGV
StockApr 22May 26Return
Expion360 Inc. (XPON)1000.2-99.8%
Beam Global (BEEM)10012.0-88.0%
CBAK Energy Technol… (CBAT)10071.2-28.8%
Energy Vault Holdin… (NRGV)10032.6-67.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: XPON vs BEEM vs CBAT vs NRGV

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CBAT leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
XPON
Expion360 Inc.
The Specific-Use Pick

XPON plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: industrials exposure
BEEM
Beam Global
The Defensive Pick

BEEM is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 2.64, Low D/E 4.7%, current ratio 2.04x
  • Beta 2.64, current ratio 2.04x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
The Income Pick

CBAT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.01
  • -4.0% margin vs BEEM's -105.9%
  • Beta 1.01 vs XPON's 3.20, lower leverage
  • -2.0% ROA vs BEEM's -65.7%, ROIC 4.6% vs -22.1%
Best for: income & stability
NRGV
Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Play

NRGV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Rev growth 340.9%, EPS growth 28.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.8%
  • -53.1% 10Y total return vs CBAT's -69.7%
  • 340.9% revenue growth vs BEEM's -26.8%
  • +475.7% vs XPON's -28.9%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNRGV logoNRGV340.9% revenue growth vs BEEM's -26.8%
Quality / MarginsCBAT logoCBAT-4.0% margin vs BEEM's -105.9%
Stability / SafetyCBAT logoCBATBeta 1.01 vs XPON's 3.20, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)NRGV logoNRGV+475.7% vs XPON's -28.9%
Efficiency (ROA)CBAT logoCBAT-2.0% ROA vs BEEM's -65.7%, ROIC 4.6% vs -22.1%

XPON vs BEEM vs CBAT vs NRGV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

XPONExpion360 Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

BEEMBeam Global
FY 2024
Product
92.9%$46M
Shipping and Handling
4.6%$2M
Professional Services
2.3%$1M
Maintenance
0.3%$129,000
CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
FY 2021
TotalHighPowerLithiumBatteriesUsedMember
39.8%$35M
UninterruptableSuppliesMember
38.1%$33M
PrecursorMember
10.4%$9M
CathodeMember
10.0%$9M
LightElectricVehiclesMember
0.8%$733,382
TradingOfRawMaterialsUsedInLithiumBatteriesMember
0.6%$519,796
ElectricVehiclesMember
0.3%$243,837
NRGVEnergy Vault Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Intellectual Property Licensing
86.0%$3M
Software Licensing
14.0%$540,000

XPON vs BEEM vs CBAT vs NRGV — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCBATLAGGINGBEEM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CBAT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

NRGV is the larger business by revenue, generating $217M annually — 23.0x XPON's $9M. CBAT is the more profitable business, keeping -4.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BEEM's -105.9%. On growth, NRGV holds the edge at +156.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricXPON logoXPONExpion360 Inc.BEEM logoBEEMBeam GlobalCBAT logoCBATCBAK Energy Techn…NRGV logoNRGVEnergy Vault Hold…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$9M$28M$162M$217M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$7M-$25M-$8M-$72M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$2M-$29M-$7M-$115M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$7M-$7M-$8M-$98M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+21.8%+15.0%+10.8%+22.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-70.9%-108.4%-10.5%-35.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-21.8%-105.9%-4.0%-53.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-70.6%-24.0%-5.1%-45.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+72.2%-49.6%+36.5%+156.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+100.4%-4.2%-42.9%
CBAT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

XPON leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricXPON logoXPONExpion360 Inc.BEEM logoBEEMBeam GlobalCBAT logoCBATCBAK Energy Techn…NRGV logoNRGVEnergy Vault Hold…
Market CapShares × price$419,221$35M$71M$784M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$900,743$32M$94M$820M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.03x-2.42x6.08x-6.97x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple5.25x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.07x0.70x0.40x3.85x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.17x0.66x0.59x8.21x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF3.15x
XPON leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CBAT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

CBAT delivers a -5.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-6 in annual profit, vs $-147 for NRGV. BEEM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NRGV's 1.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CBAT scores 7/9 vs BEEM's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricXPON logoXPONExpion360 Inc.BEEM logoBEEMBeam GlobalCBAT logoCBATCBAK Energy Techn…NRGV logoNRGVEnergy Vault Hold…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-22.7%-110.5%-5.5%-146.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-19.2%-65.7%-2.0%-40.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-97.6%-22.1%+4.6%-49.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-121.2%-21.4%+7.0%-53.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94374
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.41x0.05x0.25x1.07x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$481,522-$3M$23M$36M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$547,565$5M$7M$58M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1M$2M$30M$95M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-108.10x-715.85x-24.86x-10.33x
CBAT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NRGV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NRGV five years ago would be worth $4,637 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8 for XPON. Over the past 12 months, NRGV leads with a +475.7% total return vs XPON's -28.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NRGV at 38.1% vs XPON's -89.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricXPON logoXPONExpion360 Inc.BEEM logoBEEMBeam GlobalCBAT logoCBATCBAK Energy Techn…NRGV logoNRGVEnergy Vault Hold…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-19.3%+14.8%-8.1%-7.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-28.9%+25.7%-8.1%+475.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%-81.1%+2.6%+163.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%-92.9%-78.7%-53.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%-76.9%-69.7%-53.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-89.5%-42.6%+0.9%+38.1%
NRGV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CBAT and NRGV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CBAT is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than XPON's 3.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NRGV currently trades 71.3% from its 52-week high vs XPON's 11.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricXPON logoXPONExpion360 Inc.BEEM logoBEEMBeam GlobalCBAT logoCBATCBAK Energy Techn…NRGV logoNRGVEnergy Vault Hold…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5003.20x2.64x1.01x2.97x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$5.50$4.04$1.25$6.35
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.49$1.33$0.77$0.65
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+11.9%+46.0%+63.2%+71.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10044.360.238.452.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded194K489K110K3.7M
Evenly matched — CBAT and NRGV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
MetricXPON logoXPONExpion360 Inc.BEEM logoBEEMBeam GlobalCBAT logoCBATCBAK Energy Techn…NRGV logoNRGVEnergy Vault Hold…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$7.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts7
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

CBAT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). XPON leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallCBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

XPON vs BEEM vs CBAT vs NRGV: Key Questions Answered

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is XPON or BEEM or CBAT or NRGV a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.

(NRGV) is the stronger pick with 340. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -26. 8% for Beam Global (BEEM). CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT) offers the better valuation at 6. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — XPON or BEEM or CBAT or NRGV?

Over the past 5 years, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.

(NRGV) delivered a total return of -53. 6%, compared to -99. 9% for Expion360 Inc. (XPON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NRGV returned -53. 1% versus XPON's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — XPON or BEEM or CBAT or NRGV?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.

(CBAT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 01β versus Expion360 Inc. 's 3. 20β — meaning XPON is approximately 218% more volatile than CBAT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Beam Global (BEEM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 107% for Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — XPON or BEEM or CBAT or NRGV?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.

(NRGV) is pulling ahead at 340. 9% versus -26. 8% for Beam Global (BEEM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. grew EPS 574. 5% year-over-year, compared to -1847. 2% for Expion360 Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BEEM leads at 76. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — XPON or BEEM or CBAT or NRGV?

CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.

(CBAT) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 7% net margin versus -239. 6% for Expion360 Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CBAT leads at 5. 0% versus -120. 1% for XPON. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CBAT leads at 23. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Which pays a better dividend — XPON or BEEM or CBAT or NRGV?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

07

Is XPON or BEEM or CBAT or NRGV better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.

(CBAT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 01)). Expion360 Inc. (XPON) carries a higher beta of 3. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CBAT: -69. 7%, XPON: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between XPON and BEEM and CBAT and NRGV?

These companies operate in different sectors (XPON (Industrials) and BEEM (Energy) and CBAT (Industrials) and NRGV (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: XPON is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BEEM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CBAT is a small-cap deep-value stock; NRGV is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

XPON

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $20B
  • Revenue Growth > 36%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BEEM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CBAT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NRGV

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Utilities
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 78%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform XPON and BEEM and CBAT and NRGV on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(XPON: 72.2% · BEEM: -49.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.