XPON
Expion360 Inc.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$422K
5Y Perf.-99.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
XPON vs FLUX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
FLUX
Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$23M
5Y Perf.-55.9%
XPON vs FLUX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | XPON | FLUX |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $422K | $23M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9M | $51M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $-6M |
| Gross Margin | 21.8% | 32.1% |
| Operating Margin | -70.9% | -1.9% |
| Total Debt | $1M | $16M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $548K | $1M |
XPON vs FLUX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
XPON
FLUX
| Stock | Apr 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expion360 Inc. (XPON) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| Flux Power Holdings… (FLUX) | 100 | 44.1 | -55.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XPON vs FLUX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: FLUX leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Expion360 Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment and operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
XPON
Expion360 Inc.
The Momentum Pick
XPON is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum and efficiency.
- -23.9% vs FLUX's -31.9%
- -19.2% ROA vs FLUX's -21.0%, ROIC -97.6% vs -30.1%
Best for: momentum and efficiency
FLUX
Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
The Income Pick
FLUX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 2.30
- Rev growth 9.2%, EPS growth 20.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.2%
- -69.0% 10Y total return vs XPON's -99.9%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FLUX | 9.2% revenue growth vs XPON's -6.0% |
| Quality / Margins | FLUX | -12.5% margin vs XPON's -21.8% |
| Stability / Safety | FLUX | Beta 2.30 vs XPON's 3.34 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | XPON | -23.9% vs FLUX's -31.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | XPON | -19.2% ROA vs FLUX's -21.0%, ROIC -97.6% vs -30.1% |
XPON vs FLUX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLFLUXLAGGINGXPON
XPONExpion360 Inc.
1leads
FLUXFlux Power Holdings, …
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs XPONMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
FLUX4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
XPON4/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
FLUX5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
FLUX2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLUX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLUX is the larger business by revenue, generating $51M annually — 5.4x XPON's $9M. FLUX is the more profitable business, keeping -12.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XPON's -21.8%. On growth, XPON holds the edge at +72.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | XPONExpion360 Inc. | FLUXFlux Power Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9M | $51M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | -$212,000 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | -$6M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | -$7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.8% | +32.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -70.9% | -1.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -21.8% | -12.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -70.6% | -14.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +72.2% | -60.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.4% | -25.0% |
FLUX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — XPON and FLUX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | XPONExpion360 Inc. | FLUXFlux Power Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $422,426 | $23M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $903,948 | $37M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.03x | -3.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.08x | 0.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.17x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Evenly matched — XPON and FLUX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XPON leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
XPON delivers a -22.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-23 in annual profit, vs $-7 for FLUX. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLUX scores 6/9 vs XPON's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | XPONExpion360 Inc. | FLUXFlux Power Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -22.7% | -7.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -19.2% | -21.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -97.6% | -30.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -121.2% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.41x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $481,522 | $15M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $547,565 | $1M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $16M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -108.10x | -2.64x |
XPON leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FLUX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FLUX five years ago would be worth $1,358 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8 for XPON. Over the past 12 months, XPON leads with a -23.9% total return vs FLUX's -31.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLUX at -30.3% vs XPON's -89.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | XPONExpion360 Inc. | FLUXFlux Power Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -18.6% | -8.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -23.9% | -31.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -66.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -86.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -69.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -89.5% | -30.3% |
FLUX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FLUX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FLUX is the less volatile stock with a 2.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than XPON's 3.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLUX currently trades 17.2% from its 52-week high vs XPON's 12.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | XPONExpion360 Inc. | FLUXFlux Power Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.20x | 2.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.50 | $7.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.49 | $0.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +12.0% | +17.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.5 | 57.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 195K | 114K |
FLUX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | XPONExpion360 Inc. | FLUXFlux Power Holdin… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
FLUX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). XPON leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
Best OverallFlux Power Holdings, Inc. (FLUX)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
XPON vs FLUX: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XPON or FLUX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
(FLUX) is the stronger pick with 9. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 0% for Expion360 Inc. (XPON). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — XPON or FLUX?
Over the past 5 years, Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
(FLUX) delivered a total return of -86. 4%, compared to -99. 9% for Expion360 Inc. (XPON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FLUX returned -76. 0% versus XPON's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — XPON or FLUX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
(FLUX) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 23β versus Expion360 Inc. 's 3. 20β — meaning XPON is approximately 44% more volatile than FLUX relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — XPON or FLUX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
(FLUX) is pulling ahead at 9. 2% versus -6. 0% for Expion360 Inc. (XPON). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flux Power Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 20. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1847. 2% for Expion360 Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLUX leads at 16. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — XPON or FLUX?
Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
(FLUX) is the more profitable company, earning -10. 0% net margin versus -239. 6% for Expion360 Inc. — meaning it keeps -10. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FLUX leads at -7. 6% versus -120. 1% for XPON. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FLUX leads at 32. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — XPON or FLUX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is XPON or FLUX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
(FLUX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Expion360 Inc. (XPON) carries a higher beta of 3. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FLUX: -76. 0%, XPON: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between XPON and FLUX?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(XPON: 72.2% · FLUX: -60.6%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.