Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
XYL vs PNR vs FELE vs ITRI vs AWK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Regulated Water
XYL vs PNR vs FELE vs ITRI vs AWK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Regulated Water |
| Market Cap | $27.49B | $12.76B | $4.41B | $3.60B | $24.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.09B | $4.20B | $2.18B | $2.35B | $5.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $973M | $671M | $150M | $289M | $1.10B |
| Gross Margin | 38.6% | 40.9% | 35.2% | 38.6% | 43.6% |
| Operating Margin | 13.6% | 20.6% | 12.6% | 13.2% | 36.5% |
| Forward P/E | 20.9x | 14.8x | 21.8x | 13.5x | 20.7x |
| Total Debt | $1.94B | $1.64B | $280M | $1.29B | $15.92B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.48B | $102M | $100M | $1.02B | $119M |
XYL vs PNR vs FELE vs ITRI vs AWK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xylem Inc. (XYL) | 100 | 174.3 | +74.3% |
| Pentair plc (PNR) | 100 | 201.8 | +101.8% |
| Franklin Electric C… (FELE) | 100 | 197.0 | +97.0% |
| Itron, Inc. (ITRI) | 100 | 126.0 | +26.0% |
| American Water Work… (AWK) | 100 | 99.4 | -0.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: XYL vs PNR vs FELE vs ITRI vs AWK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
XYL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 1.4%
- Rev growth 5.5%, EPS growth 7.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.8%
- PEG 0.91 vs AWK's 2.63
PNR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for efficiency.
- 9.9% ROA vs AWK's 3.1%, ROIC 12.1% vs 5.5%
FELE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 231.4% 10Y total return vs PNR's 126.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 21.1%, current ratio 2.79x
- Beta 0.92, yield 1.1%, current ratio 2.79x
- Beta 0.92 vs ITRI's 1.53, lower leverage
ITRI is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (13.5x vs 20.7x)
AWK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and quality is your priority.
- 9.7% revenue growth vs ITRI's -3.0%
- 21.2% margin vs FELE's 6.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.7% revenue growth vs ITRI's -3.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.5x vs 20.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.2% margin vs FELE's 6.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.92 vs ITRI's 1.53, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 32-year raise streak, vs AWK's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +17.7% vs ITRI's -23.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.9% ROA vs AWK's 3.1%, ROIC 12.1% vs 5.5% |
XYL vs PNR vs FELE vs ITRI vs AWK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
XYL vs PNR vs FELE vs ITRI vs AWK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AWK leads in 1 of 6 categories
ITRI leads 1 • FELE leads 1 • XYL leads 0 • PNR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AWK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XYL is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.1B annually — 4.2x FELE's $2.2B. AWK is the more profitable business, keeping 21.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FELE's 6.9%. On growth, FELE holds the edge at +9.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9.1B | $4.2B | $2.2B | $2.3B | $5.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.8B | $983M | $322M | $367M | $2.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $973M | $671M | $150M | $289M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $966M | $716M | $169M | $393M | -$1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.6% | +40.9% | +35.2% | +38.6% | +43.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | +20.6% | +12.6% | +13.2% | +36.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +16.0% | +6.9% | +12.3% | +21.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.6% | +17.0% | +7.8% | +16.7% | -23.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.7% | +2.6% | +9.9% | -3.3% | +5.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.5% | +12.9% | +13.4% | -16.9% | -3.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ITRI leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.5x trailing earnings, ITRI trades at a 59% valuation discount to FELE's 30.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), XYL offers better value at 1.29x vs FELE's 3.53x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $27.5B | $12.8B | $4.4B | $3.6B | $24.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $27.9B | $14.3B | $4.6B | $3.9B | $40.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 29.50x | 19.94x | 30.75x | 12.46x | 22.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.91x | 14.75x | 21.77x | 13.47x | 20.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.29x | 1.52x | 3.53x | — | 2.81x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.54x | 14.66x | 13.82x | 10.48x | 14.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.04x | 3.06x | 2.07x | 1.52x | 4.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.40x | 3.38x | 3.41x | 2.15x | 2.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 30.21x | 17.11x | 22.81x | 9.44x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FELE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PNR delivers a 17.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $9 for XYL. XYL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AWK's 1.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PNR scores 8/9 vs AWK's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.5% | +17.7% | +11.4% | +17.2% | +10.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.6% | +9.9% | +7.6% | +7.7% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.6% | +12.1% | +14.7% | +13.1% | +5.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.5% | +15.0% | +18.1% | +11.4% | +6.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.42x | 0.21x | 0.74x | 1.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $463M | $1.5B | $181M | $267M | $15.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.5B | $102M | $100M | $1.0B | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.9B | $1.6B | $280M | $1.3B | $15.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 49.32x | 11.94x | 24.75x | 14.38x | 3.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — PNR and FELE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PNR five years ago would be worth $12,298 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,192 for AWK. Over the past 12 months, FELE leads with a +17.7% total return vs ITRI's -23.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PNR at 11.8% vs AWK's -2.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.3% | -24.6% | +3.6% | -14.1% | -2.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.2% | -12.8% | +17.7% | -23.7% | -12.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.9% | +39.8% | +10.0% | +20.8% | -8.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.6% | +23.0% | +20.3% | -7.2% | -8.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +204.7% | +126.9% | +231.4% | +94.4% | +100.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.8% | +11.8% | +3.2% | +6.5% | -2.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FELE and AWK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AWK is the less volatile stock with a -0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ITRI's 1.53 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FELE currently trades 89.6% from its 52-week high vs ITRI's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.92x | 1.22x | 0.92x | 1.53x | -0.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $154.27 | $113.95 | $111.53 | $142.00 | $150.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $114.15 | $77.02 | $83.42 | $78.53 | $121.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.0% | +69.3% | +89.6% | +57.1% | +84.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.4 | 35.3 | 54.8 | 35.2 | 33.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 1.6M | 281K | 893K | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FELE and AWK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: XYL as "Hold", PNR as "Hold", FELE as "Hold", ITRI as "Hold", AWK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 68.8% upside for ITRI (target: $137) vs 0.1% for FELE (target: $100). For income investors, AWK offers the higher dividend yield at 2.57% vs FELE's 1.11%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $151.57 | $113.56 | $100.00 | $137.00 | $134.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 40 | 41 | 11 | 37 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | +1.3% | +1.1% | — | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 15 | 6 | 32 | 1 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.60 | $0.99 | $1.11 | — | $3.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +1.8% | +3.8% | +2.8% | 0.0% |
AWK leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). ITRI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
XYL vs PNR vs FELE vs ITRI vs AWK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is XYL or PNR or FELE or ITRI or AWK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the stronger pick with 9. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 0% for Itron, Inc. (ITRI). Itron, Inc. (ITRI) offers the better valuation at 12. 5x trailing P/E (13. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Xylem Inc. (XYL) a "Hold" — based on 40 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — XYL or PNR or FELE or ITRI or AWK?
On trailing P/E, Itron, Inc.
(ITRI) is the cheapest at 12. 5x versus Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. at 30. 8x. On forward P/E, Itron, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Xylem Inc. wins at 0. 91x versus American Water Works Company, Inc. 's 2. 63x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — XYL or PNR or FELE or ITRI or AWK?
Over the past 5 years, Pentair plc (PNR) delivered a total return of +23.
0%, compared to -8. 1% for American Water Works Company, Inc. (AWK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FELE returned +231. 4% versus ITRI's +94. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — XYL or PNR or FELE or ITRI or AWK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 48β versus Itron, Inc. 's 1. 53β — meaning ITRI is approximately -419% more volatile than AWK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Xylem Inc. (XYL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 147% for American Water Works Company, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — XYL or PNR or FELE or ITRI or AWK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is pulling ahead at 9. 7% versus -3. 0% for Itron, Inc. (ITRI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Itron, Inc. grew EPS 25. 7% year-over-year, compared to -15. 8% for Franklin Electric Co. , Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, XYL leads at 17. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — XYL or PNR or FELE or ITRI or AWK?
American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 6% net margin versus 6. 9% for Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AWK leads at 36. 6% versus 12. 7% for FELE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AWK leads at 43. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is XYL or PNR or FELE or ITRI or AWK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Xylem Inc. (XYL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 91x versus American Water Works Company, Inc. 's 2. 63x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Itron, Inc. (ITRI) trades at 13. 5x forward P/E versus 21. 8x for Franklin Electric Co. , Inc. — 8. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ITRI: 68. 8% to $137. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — XYL or PNR or FELE or ITRI or AWK?
In this comparison, AWK (2.
6% yield), XYL (1. 4% yield), PNR (1. 3% yield), FELE (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. ITRI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is XYL or PNR or FELE or ITRI or AWK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 48), 2. 6% yield, +100. 9% 10Y return). Itron, Inc. (ITRI) carries a higher beta of 1. 53 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AWK: +100. 9%, ITRI: +94. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between XYL and PNR and FELE and ITRI and AWK?
These companies operate in different sectors (XYL (Industrials) and PNR (Industrials) and FELE (Industrials) and ITRI (Technology) and AWK (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: XYL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PNR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FELE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ITRI is a small-cap deep-value stock; AWK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. XYL, PNR, FELE, AWK pay a dividend while ITRI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.