YAAS vs SOS vs BTBT vs CANG

For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). Cango Inc. (CANG) offers the better valuation at 5. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Cango Inc.

(CANG) is the cheapest at 5. 7x versus Bit Digital, Inc. at 9. 2x.

Over the past 5 years, Cango Inc.

(CANG) delivered a total return of -14. 2%, compared to -100. 0% for SOS Limited (SOS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CANG returned -44. 9% versus SOS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Youxin Technology Ltd (YAAS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

60β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning BTBT is approximately 111% more volatile than YAAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 4% for Cango Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cango Inc. grew EPS 960. 0% year-over-year, compared to -82. 3% for SOS Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, SOS leads at -7. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Cango Inc.

(CANG) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 3% net margin versus -245. 7% for Youxin Technology Ltd — meaning it keeps 37. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CANG leads at 22. 2% versus -266. 4% for YAAS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — YAAS leads at 65. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, BTBT (0.

3% yield) pays a dividend. YAAS, SOS, CANG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Youxin Technology Ltd (YAAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.

SOS Limited (SOS) carries a higher beta of 2. 01 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (YAAS: -99. 7%, SOS: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (YAAS (Technology) and SOS (Technology) and BTBT (Financial Services) and CANG (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: YAAS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SOS is a small-cap high-growth stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; CANG is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.