Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
YAAS vs SOS vs BTBT vs CANG vs MARA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Financial - Capital Markets
Auto - Dealerships
Financial - Capital Markets
YAAS vs SOS vs BTBT vs CANG vs MARA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Financial - Capital Markets | Auto - Dealerships | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $419K | $3M | $589M | $250M | $4.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $346M | $164M | $3.46B | $907M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $-24M | $137M | $-178M | $-1.31B |
| Gross Margin | 57.2% | 3.7% | 61.9% | 13.6% | -47.7% |
| Operating Margin | -248.7% | -9.5% | 16.8% | 7.3% | -90.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 9.2x | 5.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $2M | $0.00 | $14M | $170M | $3.65B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18K | $237M | $95M | $1.29B | $547M |
YAAS vs SOS vs BTBT vs CANG vs MARA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Youxin Technology L… (YAAS) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| SOS Limited (SOS) | 100 | 16.2 | -83.8% |
| Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) | 100 | 62.5 | -37.5% |
| Cango Inc. (CANG) | 100 | 24.4 | -75.6% |
| Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA) | 100 | 75.7 | -24.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: YAAS vs SOS vs BTBT vs CANG vs MARA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
YAAS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability is your priority.
- Beta 1.60 vs BTBT's 3.37
SOS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.01, current ratio 9.97x
- Beta 2.01, current ratio 9.97x
BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
- NIM 0.1% vs MARA's 0.1%
- 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7%
- 17.3% margin vs YAAS's -271.6%
CANG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 2.25
- -44.9% 10Y total return vs MARA's -51.6%
- Better valuation composite
MARA is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- -4.7% vs YAAS's -99.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.3% margin vs YAAS's -271.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.60 vs BTBT's 3.37 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -4.7% vs YAAS's -99.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.0% ROA vs YAAS's -65.8% |
YAAS vs SOS vs BTBT vs CANG vs MARA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
YAAS vs SOS vs BTBT vs CANG vs MARA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories
SOS leads 1 • MARA leads 1 • CANG leads 1 • YAAS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTBT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CANG is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.5B annually — 2551.0x YAAS's $1M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to YAAS's -2.7%. On growth, CANG holds the edge at +58.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $346M | $164M | $3.5B | $907M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | -$15M | $166M | $333M | $627M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | -$24M | $137M | -$178M | -$1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | -$141.0B | -$448M | $0 | -$312M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.2% | +3.7% | +61.9% | +13.6% | -47.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | -9.5% | +16.8% | +7.3% | -90.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | -7.0% | +17.3% | -5.2% | -144.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | -407.3% | -65.3% | -154.0% | -34.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.2% | +48.1% | — | +58.3% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +97.8% | +33.3% | +2.8% | +3.6% | -4.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SOS leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.7x trailing earnings, CANG trades at a 38% valuation discount to BTBT's 9.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CANG's 3.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BTBT's 8.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $419,114 | $3M | $589M | $250M | $4.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2M | -$234M | $508M | $85M | $7.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.33x | -0.25x | 9.15x | 5.66x | -3.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 8.49x | 3.13x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.80x | 0.01x | 3.60x | 2.12x | 5.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.01x | 0.56x | 0.42x | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-109 for YAAS. BTBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MARA's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs YAAS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -109.2% | -5.6% | +21.4% | -4.1% | -30.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -65.8% | -4.9% | +19.0% | -2.3% | -17.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -9.5% | +6.5% | +4.6% | -9.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -5.0% | +8.5% | +4.5% | -12.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.03x | 0.04x | 1.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1M | -$237M | -$81M | -$1.1B | $3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18,372 | $237M | $95M | $1.3B | $547M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $0 | $14M | $170M | $3.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | -1.87x | 4.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MARA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CANG five years ago would be worth $8,579 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4 for SOS. Over the past 12 months, MARA leads with a -4.7% total return vs YAAS's -99.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MARA at 10.8% vs YAAS's -85.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -34.4% | -26.0% | -10.3% | -62.0% | +28.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.2% | -75.4% | -9.0% | -73.7% | -4.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -98.3% | -19.7% | +1.2% | +36.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -100.0% | -84.6% | -14.2% | -59.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -100.0% | -60.4% | -44.9% | -51.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -85.0% | -74.5% | -7.1% | +0.4% | +10.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — YAAS and MARA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
YAAS is the less volatile stock with a 1.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MARA currently trades 54.2% from its 52-week high vs YAAS's 0.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.60x | 2.01x | 3.37x | 2.25x | 3.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $560.00 | $9.62 | $4.55 | $2.88 | $23.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.75 | $0.90 | $1.25 | $0.33 | $6.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.2% | +11.5% | +40.2% | +18.6% | +54.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.7 | 46.7 | 69.1 | 58.6 | 69.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.6M | 117K | 18.5M | 1.3M | 47.6M |
Analyst Outlook
CANG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BTBT as "Buy", CANG as "Buy", MARA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 459.2% upside for CANG (target: $3) vs 27.0% for MARA (target: $16). BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.31% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $5.00 | $3.00 | $16.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 2 | 2 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.3% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 5 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.01 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.3% | +1.0% |
BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SOS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
YAAS vs SOS vs BTBT vs CANG vs MARA: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is YAAS or SOS or BTBT or CANG or MARA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). Cango Inc. (CANG) offers the better valuation at 5. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — YAAS or SOS or BTBT or CANG or MARA?
On trailing P/E, Cango Inc.
(CANG) is the cheapest at 5. 7x versus Bit Digital, Inc. at 9. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — YAAS or SOS or BTBT or CANG or MARA?
Over the past 5 years, Cango Inc.
(CANG) delivered a total return of -14. 2%, compared to -100. 0% for SOS Limited (SOS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CANG returned -44. 9% versus SOS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — YAAS or SOS or BTBT or CANG or MARA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Youxin Technology Ltd (YAAS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
60β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning BTBT is approximately 111% more volatile than YAAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 105% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — YAAS or SOS or BTBT or CANG or MARA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cango Inc. grew EPS 960. 0% year-over-year, compared to -82. 3% for SOS Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, SOS leads at -7. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — YAAS or SOS or BTBT or CANG or MARA?
Cango Inc.
(CANG) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 3% net margin versus -245. 7% for Youxin Technology Ltd — meaning it keeps 37. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CANG leads at 22. 2% versus -266. 4% for YAAS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — YAAS leads at 65. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — YAAS or SOS or BTBT or CANG or MARA?
In this comparison, BTBT (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. YAAS, SOS, CANG, MARA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is YAAS or SOS or BTBT or CANG or MARA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Youxin Technology Ltd (YAAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
SOS Limited (SOS) carries a higher beta of 2. 01 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (YAAS: -99. 7%, SOS: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between YAAS and SOS and BTBT and CANG and MARA?
These companies operate in different sectors (YAAS (Technology) and SOS (Technology) and BTBT (Financial Services) and CANG (Consumer Cyclical) and MARA (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: YAAS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SOS is a small-cap high-growth stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; CANG is a small-cap deep-value stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.