Waste Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
YDDL vs SHEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
YDDL vs SHEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Waste Management | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $187M | $898M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $53M | $266M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $-36M |
| Gross Margin | 19.8% | 37.9% |
| Operating Margin | 15.1% | -10.3% |
| Forward P/E | 21.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $785K | $642M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $27M |
Quick Verdict: YDDL vs SHEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
YDDL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 29.5%, EPS growth 20.0%
- Lower volatility, beta -1.52, Low D/E 3.8%, current ratio 1.58x
- Beta -1.52, current ratio 1.58x
SHEN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 21.6% 10Y total return vs YDDL's -21.6%
- 0.7% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
- +41.3% vs YDDL's -21.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.5% revenue growth vs SHEN's 9.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.1% margin vs SHEN's -13.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (3.8% vs 66.2%) | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +41.3% vs YDDL's -21.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.6% ROA vs SHEN's -2.0%, ROIC 34.2% vs -1.1% |
YDDL vs SHEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
YDDL vs SHEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
YDDL leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $266M annually — 5.0x YDDL's $53M. YDDL is the more profitable business, keeping 12.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SHEN's -13.7%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $53M | $266M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $104M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$36M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$276M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.8% | +37.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.1% | -10.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | -13.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | -103.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
SHEN leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SHEN's 13.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than YDDL's 20.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $187M | $898M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $186M | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 35.42x | -22.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.25x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.24x | 13.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.51x | 2.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 11.16x | 0.92x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 93.79x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
YDDL leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
YDDL delivers a 36.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-4 for SHEN. YDDL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SHEN's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), YDDL scores 6/9 vs SHEN's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +36.2% | -3.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +21.6% | -2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +34.2% | -1.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +44.4% | -1.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $614M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $27M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $785,070 | $642M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 16141.22x | -0.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SHEN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in YDDL five years ago would be worth $7,841 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,209 for SHEN. Over the past 12 months, SHEN leads with a +41.3% total return vs YDDL's -21.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHEN at -4.8% vs YDDL's -7.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -22.6% | +43.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -21.6% | +41.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.6% | -13.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.6% | -27.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.6% | +21.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.8% | -4.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — YDDL and SHEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
YDDL is the less volatile stock with a -1.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHEN's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHEN currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs YDDL's 26.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -1.52x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.23 | $17.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.61 | $9.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +26.2% | +93.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.3 | 55.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 291K | 300K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
SHEN is the only dividend payer here at 0.72% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $29.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.12 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
YDDL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SHEN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
YDDL vs SHEN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is YDDL or SHEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, One and one Green Technologies.
Inc (YDDL) is the stronger pick with 29. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 1% for Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN). One and one Green Technologies. Inc (YDDL) offers the better valuation at 35. 4x trailing P/E (21. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — YDDL or SHEN?
Over the past 5 years, One and one Green Technologies.
Inc (YDDL) delivered a total return of -21. 6%, compared to -27. 9% for Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHEN returned +21. 6% versus YDDL's -21. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — YDDL or SHEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), One and one Green Technologies.
Inc (YDDL) is the lower-risk stock at -1. 52β versus Shenandoah Telecommunications Company's 0. 89β — meaning SHEN is approximately -158% more volatile than YDDL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, One and one Green Technologies. Inc (YDDL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 66% for Shenandoah Telecommunications Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — YDDL or SHEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), One and one Green Technologies.
Inc (YDDL) is pulling ahead at 29. 5% versus 9. 1% for Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: One and one Green Technologies. Inc grew EPS 20. 0% year-over-year, compared to -120. 1% for Shenandoah Telecommunications Company. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — YDDL or SHEN?
One and one Green Technologies.
Inc (YDDL) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 1% net margin versus -11. 0% for Shenandoah Telecommunications Company — meaning it keeps 12. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: YDDL leads at 15. 1% versus -6. 2% for SHEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SHEN leads at 26. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — YDDL or SHEN?
In this comparison, SHEN (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. YDDL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is YDDL or SHEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, One and one Green Technologies.
Inc (YDDL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1. 52)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (YDDL: -21. 6%, SHEN: +21. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between YDDL and SHEN?
These companies operate in different sectors (YDDL (Industrials) and SHEN (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: YDDL is a small-cap high-growth stock; SHEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SHEN pays a dividend while YDDL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 22%
- Dividend Yield > 0.5%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.