YELP vs IAC

For growth investors, Yelp Inc.

(YELP) is the stronger pick with 3. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). Yelp Inc. (YELP) offers the better valuation at 13. 0x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Yelp Inc.

is actually cheaper at 14. 1x.

Over the past 5 years, Yelp Inc.

(YELP) delivered a total return of -24. 6%, compared to -67. 4% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IAC returned +337. 2% versus YELP's +36. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Yelp Inc.

(YELP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus IAC InterActive Corp. 's 1. 10β — meaning IAC is approximately 34% more volatile than YELP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Yelp Inc. (YELP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 30% for IAC InterActive Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Yelp Inc.

(YELP) is pulling ahead at 3. 7% versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IAC InterActive Corp. grew EPS 79. 5% year-over-year, compared to 19. 1% for Yelp Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, YELP leads at 7. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Yelp Inc.

(YELP) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 9% net margin versus -4. 3% for IAC InterActive Corp. — meaning it keeps 9. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: YELP leads at 12. 6% versus -4. 1% for IAC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — YELP leads at 90. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Yelp Inc.

(YELP) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 105. 2x for IAC InterActive Corp. — 91. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IAC: 18. 9% to $49. 17.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Yelp Inc.

(YELP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (YELP: +36. 4%, IAC: +337. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (YELP (Communication Services) and IAC (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: YELP is a small-cap deep-value stock; IAC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.