Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
YELP vs IAC vs MTCH vs ANGI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
YELP vs IAC vs MTCH vs ANGI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $1.69B | $3.21B | $8.34B | $210M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.47B | $2.25B | $3.52B | $1.02B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $139M | $41M | $663M | $20M |
| Gross Margin | 90.0% | 64.6% | 73.8% | 91.1% |
| Operating Margin | 12.4% | 1.5% | 26.6% | 4.8% |
| Forward P/E | 13.7x | 109.7x | 13.5x | 6.1x |
| Total Debt | $42M | $1.43B | $3.97B | $498M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $216M | $960M | $1.03B | $304M |
YELP vs IAC vs MTCH vs ANGI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yelp Inc. (YELP) | 100 | 131.0 | +31.0% |
| IAC InterActive Cor… (IAC) | 100 | 89.3 | -10.7% |
| Match Group, Inc. (MTCH) | 100 | 40.2 | -59.8% |
| Angi Inc. (ANGI) | 100 | 4.8 | -95.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: YELP vs IAC vs MTCH vs ANGI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
YELP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 3.7%, EPS growth 19.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 6.0%, current ratio 2.99x
- Beta 0.82, current ratio 2.99x
- 3.7% revenue growth vs IAC's -37.1%
IAC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 347.8% 10Y total return vs YELP's 10.2%
- +22.1% vs ANGI's -65.4%
MTCH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.04, yield 2.0%
- 18.8% margin vs IAC's 1.8%
- 2.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
- 15.3% ROA vs IAC's 0.6%, ROIC 23.7% vs -1.2%
ANGI is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (6.1x vs 13.5x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.7% revenue growth vs IAC's -37.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.1x vs 13.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.8% margin vs IAC's 1.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs ANGI's 1.85, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +22.1% vs ANGI's -65.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.3% ROA vs IAC's 0.6%, ROIC 23.7% vs -1.2% |
YELP vs IAC vs MTCH vs ANGI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
YELP vs IAC vs MTCH vs ANGI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MTCH leads in 2 of 6 categories
ANGI leads 1 • YELP leads 1 • IAC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MTCH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MTCH is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.5B annually — 3.4x ANGI's $1.0B. MTCH is the more profitable business, keeping 18.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IAC's 1.8%. On growth, MTCH holds the edge at +3.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $2.2B | $3.5B | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $236M | $129M | $1.0B | $86M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $139M | $41M | $663M | $20M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $281M | $60M | $1.0B | $26M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +90.0% | +64.6% | +73.8% | +91.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.4% | +1.5% | +26.6% | +4.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.5% | +1.8% | +18.8% | +1.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.1% | +2.7% | +29.0% | +2.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.8% | -25.9% | +3.9% | -3.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.7% | +64.8% | +45.5% | -163.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ANGI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.6x trailing earnings, ANGI trades at a 63% valuation discount to MTCH's 15.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ANGI's 3.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IAC's 14.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $3.2B | $8.3B | $210M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $3.7B | $11.3B | $404M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.71x | -32.42x | 15.05x | 5.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.74x | 109.69x | 13.49x | 6.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.51x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.18x | 14.30x | 11.53x | 3.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.15x | 1.34x | 2.39x | 0.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.61x | 0.70x | — | 0.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.23x | 71.54x | 8.14x | 4.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
YELP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
YELP delivers a 19.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $1 for IAC. YELP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ANGI's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MTCH scores 7/9 vs IAC's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.7% | +0.9% | — | +2.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.1% | +0.6% | +15.3% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +25.1% | -1.2% | +23.7% | +5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +22.9% | -1.3% | +23.7% | +5.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.30x | — | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$174M | $466M | $2.9B | $194M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $216M | $960M | $1.0B | $304M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $42M | $1.4B | $4.0B | $498M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 4.84x | 6.17x | 5.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MTCH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in YELP five years ago would be worth $7,215 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $386 for ANGI. Over the past 12 months, IAC leads with a +22.1% total return vs ANGI's -65.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MTCH at 4.4% vs ANGI's -41.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.7% | +10.5% | +14.1% | -58.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -19.9% | +22.1% | +20.5% | -65.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.6% | -2.9% | +13.9% | -79.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.9% | -67.3% | -74.7% | -96.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.2% | +347.8% | +195.5% | -94.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.5% | -1.0% | +4.4% | -41.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — YELP and IAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
YELP is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ANGI's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IAC currently trades 94.2% from its 52-week high vs ANGI's 27.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 1.10x | 1.04x | 1.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.22 | $45.78 | $39.20 | $19.42 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.60 | $29.56 | $26.80 | $4.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.1% | +94.2% | +91.4% | +27.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.2 | 48.1 | 68.8 | 26.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 1.1M | 4.4M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: YELP as "Hold", IAC as "Buy", MTCH as "Buy", ANGI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 143.3% upside for ANGI (target: $13) vs -0.5% for YELP (target: $28). MTCH is the only dividend payer here at 1.98% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.33 | $49.17 | $36.00 | $12.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 67 | 33 | 32 | 54 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.71 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +17.3% | +9.8% | +9.5% | +70.7% |
MTCH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). ANGI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
YELP vs IAC vs MTCH vs ANGI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is YELP or IAC or MTCH or ANGI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Yelp Inc.
(YELP) is the stronger pick with 3. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). Angi Inc. (ANGI) offers the better valuation at 5. 6x trailing P/E (6. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — YELP or IAC or MTCH or ANGI?
On trailing P/E, Angi Inc.
(ANGI) is the cheapest at 5. 6x versus Match Group, Inc. at 15. 1x. On forward P/E, Angi Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — YELP or IAC or MTCH or ANGI?
Over the past 5 years, Yelp Inc.
(YELP) delivered a total return of -27. 9%, compared to -96. 1% for Angi Inc. (ANGI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IAC returned +347. 8% versus ANGI's -94. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — YELP or IAC or MTCH or ANGI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Yelp Inc.
(YELP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Angi Inc. 's 1. 85β — meaning ANGI is approximately 125% more volatile than YELP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Yelp Inc. (YELP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 54% for Angi Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — YELP or IAC or MTCH or ANGI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Yelp Inc.
(YELP) is pulling ahead at 3. 7% versus -37. 1% for IAC InterActive Corp. (IAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IAC InterActive Corp. grew EPS 79. 5% year-over-year, compared to 17. 8% for Match Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, YELP leads at 7. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — YELP or IAC or MTCH or ANGI?
Match Group, Inc.
(MTCH) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 6% net margin versus -4. 3% for IAC InterActive Corp. — meaning it keeps 17. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MTCH leads at 25. 0% versus -4. 1% for IAC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ANGI leads at 90. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is YELP or IAC or MTCH or ANGI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Angi Inc.
(ANGI) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 109. 7x for IAC InterActive Corp. — 103. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ANGI: 143. 3% to $12. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — YELP or IAC or MTCH or ANGI?
In this comparison, MTCH (2.
0% yield) pays a dividend. YELP, IAC, ANGI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is YELP or IAC or MTCH or ANGI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Match Group, Inc.
(MTCH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 04), 2. 0% yield, +195. 5% 10Y return). Angi Inc. (ANGI) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTCH: +195. 5%, ANGI: -94. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between YELP and IAC and MTCH and ANGI?
These companies operate in different sectors (YELP (Communication Services) and IAC (Technology) and MTCH (Communication Services) and ANGI (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: YELP is a small-cap deep-value stock; IAC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MTCH is a small-cap deep-value stock; ANGI is a small-cap deep-value stock. MTCH pays a dividend while YELP, IAC, ANGI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 11%
- Dividend Yield > 0.7%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.