Beverages - Alcoholic
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
YHC vs SAM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Beverages - Alcoholic
YHC vs SAM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Beverages - Alcoholic | Beverages - Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $13M | $2.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $2.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-36M | $-61M |
| Gross Margin | 4.6% | 45.2% |
| Operating Margin | -8.9% | -3.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 20.9x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $38M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $223M |
YHC vs SAM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| LQR House Inc. (YHC) | 100 | 1.9 | -98.1% |
| The Boston Beer Com… (SAM) | 100 | 68.8 | -31.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: YHC vs SAM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
YHC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 123.2%, EPS growth -24.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 99.5%
- 123.2% revenue growth vs SAM's 3.7%
SAM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.29
- 33.8% 10Y total return vs YHC's -97.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.29, Low D/E 4.5%, current ratio 1.65x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 123.2% revenue growth vs SAM's 3.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | -2.9% margin vs YHC's -17.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.29 vs YHC's 0.92 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -14.7% vs YHC's -52.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -5.0% ROA vs YHC's -103.3%, ROIC 15.5% vs -16.7% |
YHC vs SAM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
YHC vs SAM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SAM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SAM is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.1B annually — 996.0x YHC's $2M. SAM is the more profitable business, keeping -2.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to YHC's -17.2%. On growth, SAM holds the edge at +1.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $2.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$36M | $14M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$36M | -$61M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$23M | $191M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +4.6% | +45.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.9% | -3.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -17.2% | -2.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -10.7% | +9.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -46.0% | +1.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -141.9% | -7.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — YHC and SAM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13M | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $2.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.21x | 20.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.08x | 1.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SAM leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SAM delivers a -7.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-7 in annual profit, vs $-132 for YHC. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SAM scores 7/9 vs YHC's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -132.2% | -7.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -103.3% | -5.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -16.7% | +15.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.6% | +14.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | -$186M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $223M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $38M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SAM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SAM five years ago would be worth $1,860 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $236 for YHC. Over the past 12 months, SAM leads with a -14.7% total return vs YHC's -52.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SAM at -12.9% vs YHC's -71.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.1% | +3.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -52.6% | -14.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | -33.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | -81.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | +33.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -71.3% | -12.9% |
Risk & Volatility
SAM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SAM is the less volatile stock with a 0.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than YHC's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SAM currently trades 78.0% from its 52-week high vs YHC's 8.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.92x | 0.29x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.14 | $264.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.53 | $185.34 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +8.1% | +78.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.9 | 28.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 135K | 203K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $246.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.3% | +9.3% |
SAM leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
YHC vs SAM: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is YHC or SAM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, LQR House Inc.
(YHC) is the stronger pick with 123. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 7% for The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (SAM). The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (SAM) offers the better valuation at 20. 9x trailing P/E (20. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (SAM) a "Hold" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — YHC or SAM?
Over the past 5 years, The Boston Beer Company, Inc.
(SAM) delivered a total return of -81. 4%, compared to -97. 6% for LQR House Inc. (YHC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SAM returned +33. 8% versus YHC's -97. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — YHC or SAM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Boston Beer Company, Inc.
(SAM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 29β versus LQR House Inc. 's 0. 92β — meaning YHC is approximately 215% more volatile than SAM relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — YHC or SAM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), LQR House Inc.
(YHC) is pulling ahead at 123. 2% versus 3. 7% for The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (SAM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Boston Beer Company, Inc. grew EPS 95. 5% year-over-year, compared to -24. 1% for LQR House Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, YHC leads at 99. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — YHC or SAM?
The Boston Beer Company, Inc.
(SAM) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 2% net margin versus -909. 6% for LQR House Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SAM leads at 6. 9% versus -739. 0% for YHC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SAM leads at 45. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — YHC or SAM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is YHC or SAM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Boston Beer Company, Inc.
(SAM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 29)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SAM: +33. 8%, YHC: -97. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between YHC and SAM?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: YHC is a small-cap high-growth stock; SAM is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare SAM vs TAP
TAP is one of the most direct listed alternatives to SAM.
Compare YHC vs STZ
STZ overlaps with YHC in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Expand With STZ + TAP
STZ and TAP are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.