Medical - Pharmaceuticals
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
YI vs CRON vs HIMS vs CGC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Medical - Equipment & Services
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
YI vs CRON vs HIMS vs CGC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Pharmaceuticals | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Medical - Equipment & Services | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| Market Cap | $48M | $981M | $6.63B | $122M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $14.18B | $193M | $2.35B | $294M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-74M | $-9M | $128M | $-327M |
| Gross Margin | 5.0% | 32.5% | 69.7% | 22.8% |
| Operating Margin | -0.0% | -1.5% | 4.6% | -24.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 34.3x | 51.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $257M | $2M | $1.12B | $348M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $462M | $792M | $229M | $114M |
YI vs CRON vs HIMS vs CGC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 111, Inc. (YI) | 100 | 7.5 | -92.5% |
| Cronos Group Inc. (CRON) | 100 | 39.4 | -60.6% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 258.4 | +158.4% |
| Canopy Growth Corpo… (CGC) | 100 | 0.7 | -99.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: YI vs CRON vs HIMS vs CGC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
YI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- beta 0.29
- Beta 0.29 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage
CRON carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 64.4%, EPS growth -100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.6%
- 14.6% 10Y total return vs HIMS's 161.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.98, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 19.59x
- Beta 0.98, current ratio 19.59x
HIMS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 5.5% margin vs CGC's -111.0%
- 6.0% ROA vs CGC's -29.5%, ROIC 10.7% vs -10.2%
CGC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 64.4% revenue growth vs CGC's -9.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.5% margin vs CGC's -111.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.29 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +38.9% vs HIMS's -51.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.0% ROA vs CGC's -29.5%, ROIC 10.7% vs -10.2% |
YI vs CRON vs HIMS vs CGC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
YI vs CRON vs HIMS vs CGC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HIMS leads in 3 of 6 categories
YI leads 1 • CRON leads 0 • CGC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
YI is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.2B annually — 73.4x CRON's $193M. HIMS is the more profitable business, keeping 5.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CGC's -111.0%. On growth, CRON holds the edge at +2.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $14.2B | $193M | $2.3B | $294M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11M | -$810,000 | $164M | -$32M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$74M | -$9M | $128M | -$327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $97M | -$163,766 | $73M | -$86M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +32.5% | +69.7% | +22.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.0% | -1.5% | +4.6% | -24.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.5% | -4.9% | +5.5% | -111.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | -0.1% | +3.1% | -29.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.4% | +2.0% | +28.4% | +20.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.6% | -100.0% | -27.3% | +83.8% |
Valuation Metrics
YI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, YI's 6.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIMS's 42.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $48M | $981M | $6.6B | $122M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18M | $190M | $7.5B | $293M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.05x | — | 50.32x | -0.28x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 34.27x | 51.51x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.38x | — | 42.68x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 5.07x | 2.82x | 0.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.86x | 0.90x | 12.25x | 0.34x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.32x | — | 89.61x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HIMS delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-43 for CGC. CRON carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), YI scores 7/9 vs HIMS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -21.4% | -0.9% | +23.7% | -43.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.7% | -0.8% | +6.0% | -29.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.1% | -0.8% | +10.7% | -10.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.5% | -0.3% | +10.9% | -12.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.67x | 0.00x | 2.07x | 0.72x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$206M | -$790M | $892M | $235M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $462M | $792M | $229M | $114M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $257M | $2M | $1.1B | $348M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.05x | — | — | -7.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HIMS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $23,764 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $45 for CGC. Over the past 12 months, CRON leads with a +38.9% total return vs HIMS's -51.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HIMS at 29.4% vs CGC's -55.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +102.2% | -4.8% | -23.2% | -5.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -25.4% | +38.9% | -51.0% | -12.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.9% | +29.1% | +116.6% | -91.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.1% | -66.6% | +137.6% | -99.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.0% | +1457.6% | +161.9% | -94.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -41.4% | +8.9% | +29.4% | -55.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — YI and CRON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
YI is the less volatile stock with a 0.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CRON currently trades 74.9% from its 52-week high vs HIMS's 36.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.29x | 0.98x | 2.40x | 1.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.17 | $3.43 | $70.43 | $2.38 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.48 | $1.84 | $13.74 | $0.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +50.0% | +74.9% | +36.4% | +47.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 31.1 | 49.3 | 54.5 | 52.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 13K | 1.4M | 34.9M | 10.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CRON as "Hold", HIMS as "Hold", CGC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 1180.5% upside for CGC (target: $14) vs -10.5% for CRON (target: $2).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $2.30 | $29.67 | $14.47 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 19 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.0% | +1.4% | 0.0% |
HIMS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). YI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
YI vs CRON vs HIMS vs CGC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is YI or CRON or HIMS or CGC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cronos Group Inc.
(CRON) is the stronger pick with 64. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 5% for Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC). Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) offers the better valuation at 50. 3x trailing P/E (51. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cronos Group Inc. (CRON) a "Hold" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — YI or CRON or HIMS or CGC?
On forward P/E, Cronos Group Inc.
is actually cheaper at 34. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — YI or CRON or HIMS or CGC?
Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) delivered a total return of +137. 6%, compared to -99. 6% for Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRON returned +1458% versus YI's -96. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — YI or CRON or HIMS or CGC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), 111, Inc.
(YI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 29β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 40β — meaning HIMS is approximately 724% more volatile than YI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cronos Group Inc. (CRON) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — YI or CRON or HIMS or CGC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cronos Group Inc.
(CRON) is pulling ahead at 64. 4% versus -9. 5% for Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: 111, Inc. grew EPS 83. 9% year-over-year, compared to -100. 0% for Cronos Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — YI or CRON or HIMS or CGC?
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 5% net margin versus -222. 4% for Canopy Growth Corporation — meaning it keeps 5. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HIMS leads at 5. 2% versus -43. 5% for CGC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HIMS leads at 59. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is YI or CRON or HIMS or CGC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Cronos Group Inc.
(CRON) trades at 34. 3x forward P/E versus 51. 5x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 17. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CGC: 1180. 5% to $14. 47.
08Which pays a better dividend — YI or CRON or HIMS or CGC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is YI or CRON or HIMS or CGC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cronos Group Inc.
(CRON) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 98), +1458% 10Y return). Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC) carries a higher beta of 1. 90 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CRON: +1458%, CGC: -94. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between YI and CRON and HIMS and CGC?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: YI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CRON is a small-cap high-growth stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CGC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.