YSG vs COTY

For growth investors, Yatsen Holding Limited (YSG) is the stronger pick with 0.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 7% for Coty Inc. (COTY). Analysts rate Yatsen Holding Limited (YSG) a "Hold" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Coty Inc.

(COTY) delivered a total return of -73. 5%, compared to -94. 1% for Yatsen Holding Limited (YSG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COTY returned -82. 6% versus YSG's -96. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Coty Inc.

(COTY) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 08β versus Yatsen Holding Limited's 1. 38β — meaning YSG is approximately 28% more volatile than COTY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Yatsen Holding Limited (YSG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 107% for Coty Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Yatsen Holding Limited (YSG) is pulling ahead at 0.

8% versus -3. 7% for Coty Inc. (COTY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Yatsen Holding Limited grew EPS -2. 9% year-over-year, compared to -609. 8% for Coty Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, COTY leads at 3. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Coty Inc.

(COTY) is the more profitable company, earning -6. 2% net margin versus -20. 9% for Yatsen Holding Limited — meaning it keeps -6. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: COTY leads at 4. 1% versus -12. 4% for YSG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — YSG leads at 77. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Yatsen Holding Limited (YSG) trades at 5.

0x forward P/E versus 9. 7x for Coty Inc. — 4. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

In this comparison, COTY (0.

6% yield) pays a dividend. YSG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Coty Inc.

(COTY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 08), 0. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (COTY: -82. 6%, YSG: -96. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (YSG (Consumer Cyclical) and COTY (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

COTY pays a dividend while YSG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.