YUM
Yum! Brands, Inc.
Restaurants
Market Cap$43.13B
5Y Perf.+73.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
YUM vs JACK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
JACK
Jack in the Box Inc.
Restaurants
Market Cap$261M
5Y Perf.-79.7%
YUM vs JACK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | YUM | JACK |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $43.13B | $261M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8.48B | $1.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.74B | $-69M |
| Gross Margin | 45.7% | 27.6% |
| Operating Margin | 31.5% | -2.8% |
| Forward P/E | 23.1x | 4.0x |
| Total Debt | $11.91B | $3.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $709M | $52M |
YUM vs JACK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
YUM
JACK
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM) | 100 | 173.9 | +73.9% |
| Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) | 100 | 20.3 | -79.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: YUM vs JACK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: YUM leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Jack in the Box Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
YUM
Yum! Brands, Inc.
The Income Pick
YUM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.19, yield 1.8%
- Rev growth 8.8%, EPS growth 6.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.3%
- 202.2% 10Y total return vs JACK's -59.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
JACK
Jack in the Box Inc.
The Value Play
JACK is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (4.0x vs 23.1x)
Best for: value
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | YUM | 8.8% revenue growth vs JACK's -6.7% |
| Value | JACK | Lower P/E (4.0x vs 23.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | YUM | 20.5% margin vs JACK's -5.2% |
| Stability / Safety | YUM | Beta 0.19 vs JACK's 1.69 |
| Dividends | YUM | 1.8% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs JACK's 6.4% |
| Momentum (1Y) | YUM | +7.2% vs JACK's -48.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | YUM | 22.8% ROA vs JACK's -2.7%, ROIC 48.1% vs -0.6% |
YUM vs JACK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
YUM vs JACK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLYUMLAGGINGJACK
JACKJack in the Box Inc.
1leads
YUMYum! Brands, Inc.
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs JACKMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
YUM6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
JACK4/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
YUM5/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
YUM6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
YUM2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
YUM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
YUM is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.5B annually — 6.3x JACK's $1.3B. YUM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JACK's -5.2%. On growth, YUM holds the edge at +15.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | YUMYum! Brands, Inc. | JACKJack in the Box I… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8.5B | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.8B | $16M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.7B | -$69M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.6B | -$10M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.7% | +27.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +31.5% | -2.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.5% | -5.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | -0.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.2% | -25.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +72.2% | +33.7% |
YUM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
JACK leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, YUM's 19.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JACK's 82.8x.
| Metric | YUMYum! Brands, Inc. | JACKJack in the Box I… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $43.1B | $261M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $54.3B | $3.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 28.06x | -3.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.11x | 3.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.06x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.86x | 82.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.25x | 0.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.31x | 3.52x |
JACK leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
YUM leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), YUM scores 5/9 vs JACK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | YUMYum! Brands, Inc. | JACKJack in the Box I… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +22.8% | -2.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +48.1% | -0.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +41.7% | -0.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $11.2B | $3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $709M | $52M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11.9B | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.26x | -0.51x |
YUM leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
YUM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in YUM five years ago would be worth $13,892 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,728 for JACK. Over the past 12 months, YUM leads with a +7.2% total return vs JACK's -48.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors YUM at 6.3% vs JACK's -42.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | YUMYum! Brands, Inc. | JACKJack in the Box I… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.2% | -27.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.2% | -48.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.2% | -81.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.9% | -82.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +202.2% | -59.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.3% | -42.9% |
YUM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
YUM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
YUM is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JACK's 1.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. YUM currently trades 92.1% from its 52-week high vs JACK's 46.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | YUMYum! Brands, Inc. | JACKJack in the Box I… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.19x | 1.69x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $169.39 | $29.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $137.33 | $8.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.1% | +46.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.6 | 52.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 838K |
YUM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — YUM and JACK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates YUM as "Hold" and JACK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 46.1% upside for JACK (target: $20) vs 11.8% for YUM (target: $174). For income investors, JACK offers the higher dividend yield at 6.36% vs YUM's 1.82%.
| Metric | YUMYum! Brands, Inc. | JACKJack in the Box I… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $174.38 | $19.92 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 51 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.8% | +6.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 8 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.84 | $0.87 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.3% | +1.9% |
Evenly matched — YUM and JACK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
YUM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JACK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallYum! Brands, Inc. (YUM)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
YUM vs JACK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is YUM or JACK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Yum!
Brands, Inc. (YUM) is the stronger pick with 8. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 7% for Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK). Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM) offers the better valuation at 28. 1x trailing P/E (23. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM) a "Hold" — based on 51 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — YUM or JACK?
On forward P/E, Jack in the Box Inc.
is actually cheaper at 4. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — YUM or JACK?
Over the past 5 years, Yum!
Brands, Inc. (YUM) delivered a total return of +38. 9%, compared to -82. 7% for Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: YUM returned +202. 2% versus JACK's -59. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — YUM or JACK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Yum!
Brands, Inc. (YUM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 19β versus Jack in the Box Inc. 's 1. 69β — meaning JACK is approximately 792% more volatile than YUM relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — YUM or JACK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Yum!
Brands, Inc. (YUM) is pulling ahead at 8. 8% versus -6. 7% for Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Yum! Brands, Inc. grew EPS 6. 5% year-over-year, compared to -127. 6% for Jack in the Box Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, YUM leads at 6. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — YUM or JACK?
Yum!
Brands, Inc. (YUM) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 0% net margin versus -5. 5% for Jack in the Box Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: YUM leads at 30. 8% versus -1. 2% for JACK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — YUM leads at 46. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is YUM or JACK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Jack in the Box Inc.
(JACK) trades at 4. 0x forward P/E versus 23. 1x for Yum! Brands, Inc. — 19. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JACK: 46. 1% to $19. 92.
08Which pays a better dividend — YUM or JACK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) offers the highest yield at 6. 4%, versus 1. 8% for Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM).
09Is YUM or JACK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Yum!
Brands, Inc. (YUM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 19), 1. 8% yield, +202. 2% 10Y return). Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) carries a higher beta of 1. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (YUM: +202. 2%, JACK: -59. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between YUM and JACK?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: YUM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; JACK is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(YUM: 15.2% · JACK: -25.5%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.