Restaurants
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
YUM vs WEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
YUM vs WEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $43.13B | $1.27B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8.48B | $2.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.74B | $186M |
| Gross Margin | 45.7% | 35.6% |
| Operating Margin | 31.5% | 16.8% |
| Forward P/E | 23.1x | 11.5x |
| Total Debt | $11.91B | $4.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $709M | $451M |
YUM vs WEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM) | 100 | 173.9 | +73.9% |
| The Wendy's Company (WEN) | 100 | 31.3 | -68.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: YUM vs WEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
YUM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.19, yield 1.8%
- Rev growth 8.8%, EPS growth 6.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.3%
- 202.2% 10Y total return vs WEN's 8.5%
WEN is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and defensive.
- PEG 1.11 vs YUM's 1.70
- Beta 0.52, yield 15.0%, current ratio 1.85x
- Lower P/E (11.5x vs 23.1x), PEG 1.11 vs 1.70
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.8% revenue growth vs WEN's 3.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.5x vs 23.1x), PEG 1.11 vs 1.70 | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.5% margin vs WEN's 8.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.19 vs WEN's 0.52 | |
| Dividends | 15.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs YUM's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.2% vs WEN's -39.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.8% ROA vs WEN's 3.7%, ROIC 48.1% vs 7.1% |
YUM vs WEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
YUM vs WEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
YUM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
YUM is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.5B annually — 3.8x WEN's $2.2B. YUM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WEN's 8.4%. On growth, YUM holds the edge at +15.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8.5B | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.8B | $530M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.7B | $186M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.6B | $238M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.7% | +35.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +31.5% | +16.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.5% | +8.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +10.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.2% | -3.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +72.2% | -8.0% |
Valuation Metrics
WEN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.0x trailing earnings, WEN trades at a 75% valuation discount to YUM's 28.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WEN offers better value at 0.67x vs YUM's 2.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $43.1B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $54.3B | $4.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 28.06x | 7.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.11x | 11.55x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.06x | 0.67x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.86x | 9.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.25x | 0.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 5.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.31x | 4.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
YUM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +170.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +22.8% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +48.1% | +7.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +41.7% | +7.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 15.78x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $11.2B | $3.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $709M | $451M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11.9B | $4.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.26x | 2.86x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
YUM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in YUM five years ago would be worth $13,892 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,518 for WEN. Over the past 12 months, YUM leads with a +7.2% total return vs WEN's -39.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors YUM at 6.3% vs WEN's -26.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.2% | -16.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.2% | -39.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.2% | -59.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.9% | -54.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +202.2% | +8.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.3% | -26.1% |
Risk & Volatility
YUM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
YUM is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WEN's 0.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. YUM currently trades 92.1% from its 52-week high vs WEN's 53.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.19x | 0.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $169.39 | $12.52 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $137.33 | $6.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.1% | +53.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.6 | 41.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 7.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — YUM and WEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates YUM as "Hold" and WEN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 16.2% upside for WEN (target: $8) vs 11.8% for YUM (target: $174). For income investors, WEN offers the higher dividend yield at 14.95% vs YUM's 1.82%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $174.38 | $7.73 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 51 | 51 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.8% | +15.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 8 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.84 | $0.99 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.3% | +6.1% |
YUM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WEN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
YUM vs WEN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is YUM or WEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Yum!
Brands, Inc. (YUM) is the stronger pick with 8. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for The Wendy's Company (WEN). The Wendy's Company (WEN) offers the better valuation at 7. 0x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM) a "Hold" — based on 51 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — YUM or WEN?
On trailing P/E, The Wendy's Company (WEN) is the cheapest at 7.
0x versus Yum! Brands, Inc. at 28. 1x. On forward P/E, The Wendy's Company is actually cheaper at 11. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Wendy's Company wins at 1. 11x versus Yum! Brands, Inc. 's 1. 70x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — YUM or WEN?
Over the past 5 years, Yum!
Brands, Inc. (YUM) delivered a total return of +38. 9%, compared to -54. 8% for The Wendy's Company (WEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: YUM returned +202. 2% versus WEN's +8. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — YUM or WEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Yum!
Brands, Inc. (YUM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 19β versus The Wendy's Company's 0. 52β — meaning WEN is approximately 176% more volatile than YUM relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — YUM or WEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Yum!
Brands, Inc. (YUM) is pulling ahead at 8. 8% versus 3. 0% for The Wendy's Company (WEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Yum! Brands, Inc. grew EPS 6. 5% year-over-year, compared to -2. 1% for The Wendy's Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, YUM leads at 6. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — YUM or WEN?
Yum!
Brands, Inc. (YUM) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 0% net margin versus 8. 7% for The Wendy's Company — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: YUM leads at 30. 8% versus 16. 5% for WEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — YUM leads at 46. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is YUM or WEN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Wendy's Company (WEN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 11x versus Yum! Brands, Inc. 's 1. 70x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, The Wendy's Company (WEN) trades at 11. 5x forward P/E versus 23. 1x for Yum! Brands, Inc. — 11. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WEN: 16. 2% to $7. 73.
08Which pays a better dividend — YUM or WEN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
The Wendy's Company (WEN) offers the highest yield at 15. 0%, versus 1. 8% for Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM).
09Is YUM or WEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Yum!
Brands, Inc. (YUM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 19), 1. 8% yield, +202. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (YUM: +202. 2%, WEN: +8. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between YUM and WEN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: YUM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; WEN is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.