YUMC vs JACK

For growth investors, Yum China Holdings, Inc.

(YUMC) is the stronger pick with 4. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 7% for Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK). Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) offers the better valuation at 19. 2x trailing P/E (16. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Jack in the Box Inc.

is actually cheaper at 4. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Yum China Holdings, Inc.

(YUMC) delivered a total return of -17. 3%, compared to -82. 8% for Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: YUMC returned +105. 5% versus JACK's -59. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Yum China Holdings, Inc.

(YUMC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus Jack in the Box Inc. 's 1. 69β — meaning JACK is approximately 169% more volatile than YUMC relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Yum China Holdings, Inc.

(YUMC) is pulling ahead at 4. 4% versus -6. 7% for Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Yum China Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 6. 8% year-over-year, compared to -127. 6% for Jack in the Box Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, YUMC leads at 7. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Yum China Holdings, Inc.

(YUMC) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 9% net margin versus -5. 5% for Jack in the Box Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: YUMC leads at 12. 4% versus -1. 2% for JACK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JACK leads at 28. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Jack in the Box Inc.

(JACK) trades at 4. 0x forward P/E versus 16. 6x for Yum China Holdings, Inc. — 12. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JACK: 43. 6% to $19. 92.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) offers the highest yield at 6. 3%, versus 2. 0% for Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Yum China Holdings, Inc.

(YUMC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), 2. 0% yield, +105. 5% 10Y return). Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) carries a higher beta of 1. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (YUMC: +105. 5%, JACK: -59. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: YUMC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; JACK is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.