Restaurants
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
YUMC vs JACK vs MCD vs WEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
Restaurants
Restaurants
YUMC vs JACK vs MCD vs WEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $16.90B | $266M | $201.63B | $1.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12.09B | $1.35B | $27.45B | $2.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $946M | $-69M | $8.68B | $186M |
| Gross Margin | 17.2% | 27.6% | 44.1% | 35.6% |
| Operating Margin | 11.8% | -2.8% | 46.3% | 16.8% |
| Forward P/E | 16.6x | 4.0x | 21.5x | 12.1x |
| Total Debt | $2.35B | $3.12B | $54.81B | $4.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $506M | $52M | $774M | $451M |
YUMC vs JACK vs MCD vs WEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yum China Holdings,… (YUMC) | 100 | 103.8 | +3.8% |
| Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) | 100 | 20.7 | -79.3% |
| McDonald's Corporat… (MCD) | 100 | 152.2 | +52.2% |
| The Wendy's Company (WEN) | 100 | 32.7 | -67.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: YUMC vs JACK vs MCD vs WEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
YUMC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 4.4%, EPS growth 6.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.2%
- 4.4% revenue growth vs JACK's -6.7%
- +13.0% vs JACK's -47.8%
JACK is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (4.0x vs 21.5x)
MCD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 27 yrs, beta 0.11, yield 2.5%
- 157.7% 10Y total return vs YUMC's 105.5%
- 31.6% margin vs JACK's -5.2%
- Beta 0.11 vs JACK's 1.69
WEN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, current ratio 1.85x
- PEG 1.16 vs YUMC's 3.27
- Beta 0.52, yield 14.3%, current ratio 1.85x
- 14.3% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs MCD's 2.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.4% revenue growth vs JACK's -6.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.0x vs 21.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.6% margin vs JACK's -5.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.11 vs JACK's 1.69 | |
| Dividends | 14.3% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs MCD's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +13.0% vs JACK's -47.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.5% ROA vs JACK's -2.7%, ROIC 18.7% vs -0.6% |
YUMC vs JACK vs MCD vs WEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
YUMC vs JACK vs MCD vs WEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MCD leads in 4 of 6 categories
JACK leads 1 • YUMC leads 0 • WEN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCD is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.4B annually — 20.4x JACK's $1.3B. MCD is the more profitable business, keeping 31.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JACK's -5.2%. On growth, YUMC holds the edge at +9.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12.1B | $1.3B | $27.4B | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.9B | $16M | $14.4B | $530M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $946M | -$69M | $8.7B | $186M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.1B | -$10M | $7.2B | $238M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.2% | +27.6% | +44.1% | +35.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | -2.8% | +46.3% | +16.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.8% | -5.2% | +31.6% | +8.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | -0.7% | +26.2% | +10.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.7% | -25.5% | +9.4% | -3.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.0% | +33.7% | +6.9% | -8.0% |
Valuation Metrics
JACK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.3x trailing earnings, WEN trades at a 69% valuation discount to MCD's 23.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WEN offers better value at 0.71x vs YUMC's 3.78x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $16.9B | $266M | $201.6B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18.7B | $3.3B | $255.7B | $5.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.24x | -3.29x | 23.74x | 7.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.64x | 4.03x | 21.51x | 12.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.78x | — | 1.74x | 0.71x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.83x | 82.92x | 17.57x | 9.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.43x | 0.18x | 7.50x | 0.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.83x | — | — | 5.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.11x | 3.58x | 28.06x | 5.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MCD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WEN delivers a 170.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $170 in annual profit, vs $15 for YUMC. YUMC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WEN's 15.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), YUMC scores 7/9 vs JACK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.1% | — | — | +170.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.7% | -2.7% | +14.5% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.6% | -0.6% | +18.7% | +7.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.8% | -0.8% | +23.3% | +7.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.38x | — | — | 15.78x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.8B | $3.1B | $54.0B | $3.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $506M | $52M | $774M | $451M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.3B | $3.1B | $54.8B | $4.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -0.51x | 6.09x | 2.86x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MCD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MCD five years ago would be worth $13,427 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,723 for JACK. Over the past 12 months, YUMC leads with a +13.0% total return vs JACK's -47.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MCD at 0.8% vs JACK's -42.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.5% | -25.9% | -5.8% | -13.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +13.0% | -47.8% | -8.6% | -36.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.5% | -81.2% | +2.5% | -58.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.3% | -82.8% | +34.3% | -53.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +105.5% | -59.5% | +157.7% | +10.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.6% | -42.7% | +0.8% | -25.3% |
Risk & Volatility
MCD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MCD is the less volatile stock with a 0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JACK's 1.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MCD currently trades 83.0% from its 52-week high vs JACK's 47.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 1.69x | 0.11x | 0.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $58.39 | $29.40 | $341.75 | $12.52 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $41.69 | $8.91 | $282.15 | $6.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.4% | +47.2% | +83.0% | +55.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.4 | 58.4 | 30.9 | 42.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 837K | 3.0M | 7.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MCD and WEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: YUMC as "Buy", JACK as "Hold", MCD as "Buy", WEN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 43.6% upside for JACK (target: $20) vs 11.2% for WEN (target: $8). For income investors, WEN offers the higher dividend yield at 14.31% vs YUMC's 2.04%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $59.05 | $19.92 | $352.25 | $7.73 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 41 | 62 | 51 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +6.3% | +2.5% | +14.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 0 | 27 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.98 | $0.87 | $7.14 | $0.99 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.8% | +1.9% | +1.0% | +5.8% |
MCD leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JACK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
YUMC vs JACK vs MCD vs WEN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is YUMC or JACK or MCD or WEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Yum China Holdings, Inc.
(YUMC) is the stronger pick with 4. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 7% for Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK). The Wendy's Company (WEN) offers the better valuation at 7. 3x trailing P/E (12. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — YUMC or JACK or MCD or WEN?
On trailing P/E, The Wendy's Company (WEN) is the cheapest at 7.
3x versus McDonald's Corporation at 23. 7x. On forward P/E, Jack in the Box Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Wendy's Company wins at 1. 16x versus Yum China Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 27x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — YUMC or JACK or MCD or WEN?
Over the past 5 years, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) delivered a total return of +34.
3%, compared to -82. 8% for Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MCD returned +157. 7% versus JACK's -59. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — YUMC or JACK or MCD or WEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
11β versus Jack in the Box Inc. 's 1. 69β — meaning JACK is approximately 1417% more volatile than MCD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 16% for The Wendy's Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — YUMC or JACK or MCD or WEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Yum China Holdings, Inc.
(YUMC) is pulling ahead at 4. 4% versus -6. 7% for Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Yum China Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 6. 8% year-over-year, compared to -127. 6% for Jack in the Box Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, YUMC leads at 7. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — YUMC or JACK or MCD or WEN?
McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the more profitable company, earning 31.
9% net margin versus -5. 5% for Jack in the Box Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MCD leads at 46. 1% versus -1. 2% for JACK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MCD leads at 57. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is YUMC or JACK or MCD or WEN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Wendy's Company (WEN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 16x versus Yum China Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 27x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) trades at 4. 0x forward P/E versus 21. 5x for McDonald's Corporation — 17. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JACK: 43. 6% to $19. 92.
08Which pays a better dividend — YUMC or JACK or MCD or WEN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
The Wendy's Company (WEN) offers the highest yield at 14. 3%, versus 2. 0% for Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC).
09Is YUMC or JACK or MCD or WEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
11), 2. 5% yield, +157. 7% 10Y return). Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) carries a higher beta of 1. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MCD: +157. 7%, JACK: -59. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between YUMC and JACK and MCD and WEN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: YUMC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; JACK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MCD is a large-cap quality compounder stock; WEN is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.