Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

YUMC vs NFLX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
YUMC
Yum China Holdings, Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • CN
Market Cap$16.90B
5Y Perf.+3.8%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$374.00B
5Y Perf.+110.3%

YUMC vs NFLX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
YUMC logoYUMC
NFLX logoNFLX
IndustryRestaurantsEntertainment
Market Cap$16.90B$374.00B
Revenue (TTM)$12.09B$45.18B
Net Income (TTM)$946M$10.98B
Gross Margin17.2%48.5%
Operating Margin11.8%29.5%
Forward P/E16.6x24.8x
Total Debt$2.35B$14.46B
Cash & Equiv.$506M$9.03B

YUMC vs NFLXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

YUMC
NFLX
StockMay 20May 26Return
Yum China Holdings,… (YUMC)100103.8+3.8%
Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)100210.3+110.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: YUMC vs NFLX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NFLX leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Yum China Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
YUMC
Yum China Holdings, Inc.
The Value Play

YUMC is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.

  • Lower P/E (16.6x vs 24.8x)
  • 2.0% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
  • +13.0% vs NFLX's -23.6%
Best for: value and dividends
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
The Income Pick

NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • beta 0.39
  • Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
  • 8.8% 10Y total return vs YUMC's 105.5%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNFLX logoNFLX15.9% revenue growth vs YUMC's 4.4%
ValueYUMC logoYUMCLower P/E (16.6x vs 24.8x)
Quality / MarginsNFLX logoNFLX24.3% margin vs YUMC's 7.8%
Stability / SafetyNFLX logoNFLXBeta 0.39 vs YUMC's 0.63
DividendsYUMC logoYUMC2.0% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)YUMC logoYUMC+13.0% vs NFLX's -23.6%
Efficiency (ROA)NFLX logoNFLX19.8% ROA vs YUMC's 8.7%, ROIC 29.8% vs 13.6%

YUMC vs NFLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

YUMCYum China Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Food And Non Food Revenues From Sales
91.6%$11.0B
Other Revenue
7.5%$902M
Franchise Fees And Income
0.9%$104M
NFLXNetflix, Inc.
FY 2024
Streaming
100.0%$39.0B

YUMC vs NFLX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNFLXLAGGINGYUMC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NFLX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

NFLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $45.2B annually — 3.7x YUMC's $12.1B. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to YUMC's 7.8%. On growth, NFLX holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricYUMC logoYUMCYum China Holding…NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$12.1B$45.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1.9B$30.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$946M$11.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$1.1B$9.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+17.2%+48.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+11.8%+29.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+7.8%+24.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+9.0%+20.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.7%+17.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+13.0%+31.1%
NFLX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

YUMC leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 19.2x trailing earnings, YUMC trades at a 45% valuation discount to NFLX's 34.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NFLX offers better value at 1.06x vs YUMC's 3.78x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricYUMC logoYUMCYum China Holding…NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$16.9B$374.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$18.7B$379.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS19.24x34.89x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.16.64x24.80x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate3.78x1.06x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.83x12.61x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.43x8.28x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.83x14.32x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF20.11x39.53x
YUMC leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $15 for YUMC. YUMC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NFLX's 0.54x.

MetricYUMC logoYUMCYum China Holding…NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+15.1%+41.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+8.7%+19.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+13.6%+29.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+16.8%+30.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–977
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.38x0.54x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.8B$5.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$506M$9.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2.3B$14.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense17.33x
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $17,519 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,269 for YUMC. Over the past 12 months, YUMC leads with a +13.0% total return vs NFLX's -23.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs YUMC's -6.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricYUMC logoYUMCYum China Holding…NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+0.5%-3.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+13.0%-23.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-18.5%+166.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-17.3%+75.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+105.5%+875.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-6.6%+38.6%
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — YUMC and NFLX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than YUMC's 0.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. YUMC currently trades 82.4% from its 52-week high vs NFLX's 65.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricYUMC logoYUMCYum China Holding…NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.63x0.39x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$58.39$134.12
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$41.69$75.01
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+82.4%+65.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10047.435.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.5M44.0M
Evenly matched — YUMC and NFLX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates YUMC as "Buy" and NFLX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.8% upside for NFLX (target: $116) vs 22.7% for YUMC (target: $59). YUMC is the only dividend payer here at 2.04% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricYUMC logoYUMCYum China Holding…NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$59.05$116.29
# AnalystsCovering analysts1999
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises5
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.98
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+6.8%+2.4%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). YUMC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallNetflix, Inc. (NFLX)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

YUMC vs NFLX: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is YUMC or NFLX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 4% for Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC). Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) offers the better valuation at 19. 2x trailing P/E (16. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — YUMC or NFLX?

On trailing P/E, Yum China Holdings, Inc.

(YUMC) is the cheapest at 19. 2x versus Netflix, Inc. at 34. 9x. On forward P/E, Yum China Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Netflix, Inc. wins at 0. 75x versus Yum China Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 27x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — YUMC or NFLX?

Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) delivered a total return of +75. 2%, compared to -17. 3% for Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +875. 3% versus YUMC's +105. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — YUMC or NFLX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Yum China Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 63β — meaning YUMC is approximately 62% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 54% for Netflix, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — YUMC or NFLX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus 4. 4% for Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Netflix, Inc. grew EPS 27. 6% year-over-year, compared to 6. 8% for Yum China Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NFLX leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — YUMC or NFLX?

Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus 7. 9% for Yum China Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus 12. 4% for YUMC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NFLX leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is YUMC or NFLX more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 75x versus Yum China Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 27x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) trades at 16. 6x forward P/E versus 24. 8x for Netflix, Inc. — 8. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFLX: 31. 8% to $116. 29.

08

Which pays a better dividend — YUMC or NFLX?

In this comparison, YUMC (2.

0% yield) pays a dividend. NFLX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is YUMC or NFLX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +875. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +875. 3%, YUMC: +105. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between YUMC and NFLX?

These companies operate in different sectors (YUMC (Consumer Cyclical) and NFLX (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: YUMC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock. YUMC pays a dividend while NFLX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

YUMC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NFLX

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform YUMC and NFLX on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(YUMC: 9.7% · NFLX: 17.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(YUMC: 7.8% · NFLX: 24.3%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(YUMC: 19.2x · NFLX: 34.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.