Personal Products & Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
YYGH vs CLPS vs CODA vs EDTK vs FEDU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Aerospace & Defense
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
YYGH vs CLPS vs CODA vs EDTK vs FEDU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Personal Products & Services | Information Technology Services | Aerospace & Defense | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $67M | $25M | $134M | $16M | $2M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $73M | $299M | $28M | $6M | $251M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $-4M | $4M | $-26M | $801K |
| Gross Margin | 12.2% | 22.8% | 66.3% | -42.0% | 18.8% |
| Operating Margin | -4.4% | -1.4% | 17.4% | -323.1% | -6.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 22.5x | — | 18.8x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $34M | $395K | $701K | $98M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $837K | $28M | $29M | $1M | $211M |
YYGH vs CLPS vs CODA vs EDTK vs FEDU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| YY Group Holding Li… (YYGH) | 100 | 0.9 | -99.1% |
| CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) | 100 | 94.4 | -5.6% |
| Coda Octopus Group,… (CODA) | 100 | 178.9 | +78.9% |
| Skillful Craftsman … (EDTK) | 100 | 103.0 | +3.0% |
| Four Seasons Educat… (FEDU) | 100 | 108.1 | +8.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: YYGH vs CLPS vs CODA vs EDTK vs FEDU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
YYGH lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CLPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability and dividends is your priority.
- Beta 0.27 vs YYGH's 2.22, lower leverage
- 14.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs FEDU's 100.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
CODA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 30.7%, EPS growth 15.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.1%
- 8.4% 10Y total return vs CLPS's -78.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 8.86x
- 14.8% margin vs EDTK's -416.2%
Among these 5 stocks, EDTK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FEDU ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.29, yield 100.0%
- Beta 0.29, yield 100.0%, current ratio 2.19x
- 100.1% revenue growth vs EDTK's -55.3%
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 100.1% revenue growth vs EDTK's -55.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.8% margin vs EDTK's -416.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs YYGH's 2.22, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 14.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs FEDU's 100.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +78.9% vs YYGH's -98.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.6% ROA vs EDTK's -73.7%, ROIC 11.2% vs -5.2% |
YYGH vs CLPS vs CODA vs EDTK vs FEDU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
YYGH vs CLPS vs CODA vs EDTK vs FEDU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CODA leads in 3 of 6 categories
FEDU leads 1 • EDTK leads 1 • YYGH leads 0 • CLPS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CODA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $299M annually — 48.7x EDTK's $6M. CODA is the more profitable business, keeping 14.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EDTK's -4.2%. On growth, FEDU holds the edge at +83.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $73M | $299M | $28M | $6M | $251M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | -$1M | $6M | -$15M | -$11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | -$4M | $4M | -$26M | $801,000 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $0 | $7M | -$6M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | +22.8% | +66.3% | -42.0% | +18.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | -1.4% | +17.4% | -3.2% | -6.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.5% | -1.3% | +14.8% | -4.2% | +0.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | -2.3% | +24.6% | -104.4% | -14.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.6% | +15.3% | +28.8% | -92.0% | +83.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.9% | +75.8% | +3.0% | -7.0% | -12.3% |
Valuation Metrics
FEDU leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.8x trailing earnings, FEDU trades at a 42% valuation discount to CODA's 32.2x P/E.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $67M | $25M | $134M | $16M | $2M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $72M | $31M | $106M | $15M | -$14M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.33x | -3.48x | 32.16x | -5.26x | 18.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 22.45x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 7.51x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 17.85x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.64x | 0.15x | 5.05x | 17.82x | 0.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.13x | 0.43x | 2.30x | 1.15x | 0.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 22.20x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CODA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CODA delivers a 7.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-133 for EDTK. CODA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to YYGH's 0.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CODA scores 7/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -64.3% | -6.1% | +7.2% | -133.3% | +0.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -25.9% | -3.2% | +6.6% | -73.7% | +0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -35.4% | -7.9% | +11.2% | -5.2% | -3.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -68.4% | -9.8% | +8.1% | -4.3% | -2.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.81x | 0.59x | 0.01x | 0.05x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | $6M | -$28M | -$517,347 | -$112M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $836,907 | $28M | $29M | $1M | $211M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $34M | $394,932 | $700,621 | $98M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9.23x | — | — | -6.78x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CODA five years ago would be worth $14,969 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $77 for YYGH. Over the past 12 months, CODA leads with a +78.9% total return vs YYGH's -98.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CODA at 10.4% vs YYGH's -80.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -89.7% | -10.3% | +25.1% | +11.1% | -10.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -98.1% | -5.4% | +78.9% | +18.0% | +38.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | +0.5% | +34.5% | -41.0% | +30.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | -69.3% | +49.7% | -53.7% | -40.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | -78.5% | +844.4% | -78.9% | -88.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -80.2% | +0.2% | +10.4% | -16.1% | +9.3% |
Risk & Volatility
EDTK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EDTK is the less volatile stock with a -0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than YYGH's 2.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EDTK currently trades 84.7% from its 52-week high vs YYGH's 0.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.22x | 0.27x | 1.00x | -0.19x | 0.29x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $172.50 | $1.88 | $17.28 | $1.18 | $17.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.20 | $0.80 | $5.98 | $0.80 | $6.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.6% | +48.2% | +68.9% | +84.7% | +60.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.3 | 49.8 | 48.6 | 50.7 | 50.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 899K | 15K | 256K | 3K | 1K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CLPS and FEDU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CODA as "Buy", FEDU as "Hold". For income investors, FEDU offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs CLPS's 14.60%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $14.00 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 1 | — | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +14.6% | — | — | +100.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | 0 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.13 | — | — | $164.29 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CODA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FEDU leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
YYGH vs CLPS vs CODA vs EDTK vs FEDU: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is YYGH or CLPS or CODA or EDTK or FEDU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc.
(FEDU) is the stronger pick with 100. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -55. 3% for Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited (EDTK). Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc. (FEDU) offers the better valuation at 18. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — YYGH or CLPS or CODA or EDTK or FEDU?
On trailing P/E, Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc.
(FEDU) is the cheapest at 18. 8x versus Coda Octopus Group, Inc. at 32. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — YYGH or CLPS or CODA or EDTK or FEDU?
Over the past 5 years, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) delivered a total return of +49. 7%, compared to -99. 2% for YY Group Holding Limited (YYGH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CODA returned +844. 4% versus YYGH's -99. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — YYGH or CLPS or CODA or EDTK or FEDU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited (EDTK) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
19β versus YY Group Holding Limited's 2. 22β — meaning YYGH is approximately -1279% more volatile than EDTK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 81% for YY Group Holding Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — YYGH or CLPS or CODA or EDTK or FEDU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc.
(FEDU) is pulling ahead at 100. 1% versus -55. 3% for Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited (EDTK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited grew EPS 38. 7% year-over-year, compared to -633. 3% for YY Group Holding Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, YYGH leads at 33. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — YYGH or CLPS or CODA or EDTK or FEDU?
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus -333. 3% for Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CODA leads at 17. 1% versus -116. 4% for EDTK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EDTK leads at 78. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — YYGH or CLPS or CODA or EDTK or FEDU?
In this comparison, FEDU (100.
0% yield), CLPS (14. 6% yield) pay a dividend. YYGH, CODA, EDTK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is YYGH or CLPS or CODA or EDTK or FEDU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
27), 14. 6% yield). YY Group Holding Limited (YYGH) carries a higher beta of 2. 22 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPS: -78. 5%, YYGH: -99. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between YYGH and CLPS and CODA and EDTK and FEDU?
These companies operate in different sectors (YYGH (Consumer Cyclical) and CLPS (Technology) and CODA (Industrials) and EDTK (Consumer Defensive) and FEDU (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: YYGH is a small-cap high-growth stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CODA is a small-cap high-growth stock; EDTK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FEDU is a small-cap high-growth stock. CLPS, FEDU pay a dividend while YYGH, CODA, EDTK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Consumer Defensive
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 41%
- Dividend Yield > 40.0%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.