YYGH
YY Group Holding Limited
Personal Products & Services
Market Cap$67M
5Y Perf.-99.1%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
YYGH vs CODA vs CLPS vs MNDO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
Aerospace & Defense
Market Cap$134M
5Y Perf.+78.9%
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
Information Technology Services
Market Cap$25M
5Y Perf.-5.6%
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd
Software - Application
Market Cap$21M
5Y Perf.-46.6%
YYGH vs CODA vs CLPS vs MNDO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | YYGH | CODA | CLPS | MNDO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Personal Products & Services | Aerospace & Defense | Information Technology Services | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $67M | $134M | $25M | $21M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $73M | $28M | $299M | $19M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $4M | $-4M | $3M |
| Gross Margin | 12.2% | 66.3% | 22.8% | 51.0% |
| Operating Margin | -4.4% | 17.4% | -1.4% | 10.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.5x | — | 7.8x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $395K | $34M | $929K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $837K | $29M | $28M | $8M |
YYGH vs CODA vs CLPS vs MNDO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
YYGH
CODA
CLPS
MNDO
| Stock | Apr 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| YY Group Holding Li… (YYGH) | 100 | 0.9 | -99.1% |
| Coda Octopus Group,… (CODA) | 100 | 178.9 | +78.9% |
| CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) | 100 | 94.4 | -5.6% |
| MIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO) | 100 | 53.4 | -46.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: YYGH vs CODA vs CLPS vs MNDO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CODA and MNDO are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. MIND C.T.I. Ltd is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. CLPS also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
YYGH
YY Group Holding Limited
The Growth Angle
YYGH lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
The Growth Play
CODA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 30.7%, EPS growth 15.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.1%
- 8.4% 10Y total return vs MNDO's 66.7%
- 30.7% revenue growth vs MNDO's -9.3%
- 14.8% margin vs YYGH's -5.5%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
The Income Pick
CLPS is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 14.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs MNDO's 21.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: dividends
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd
The Income Pick
MNDO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 21.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.07, Low D/E 4.0%, current ratio 3.83x
- Beta 0.07, yield 21.6%, current ratio 3.83x
- Better valuation composite
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CODA | 30.7% revenue growth vs MNDO's -9.3% |
| Value | MNDO | Better valuation composite |
| Quality / Margins | CODA | 14.8% margin vs YYGH's -5.5% |
| Stability / Safety | MNDO | Beta 0.07 vs YYGH's 2.22, lower leverage |
| Dividends | CLPS | 14.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs MNDO's 21.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) |
| Momentum (1Y) | CODA | +78.9% vs YYGH's -98.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MNDO | 8.6% ROA vs YYGH's -25.9%, ROIC 8.6% vs -35.4% |
YYGH vs CODA vs CLPS vs MNDO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
YYGH vs CODA vs CLPS vs MNDO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCODALAGGINGMNDO
Who Leads Where
CODA leads in 3 of 6 categories
YYGH leads 0 • CLPS leads 0 • MNDO leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd
0leads
CLPSCLPS Incorporation
0leads
YYGHYY Group Holding Limi…
0leads
CODACoda Octopus Group, I…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs YYGHvs CLPSMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CODA5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CODA6/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CODA6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CODA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $299M annually — 15.4x MNDO's $19M. CODA is the more profitable business, keeping 14.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to YYGH's -5.5%. On growth, CODA holds the edge at +28.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | YYGHYY Group Holding … | CODACoda Octopus Grou… | CLPSCLPS Incorporation | MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $73M | $28M | $299M | $19M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $6M | -$1M | $2M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $4M | -$4M | $3M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $7M | $0 | $4M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | +66.3% | +22.8% | +51.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | +17.4% | -1.4% | +10.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.5% | +14.8% | -1.3% | +13.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +24.6% | -2.3% | +20.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.6% | +28.8% | +15.3% | -6.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.9% | +3.0% | +75.8% | -23.4% |
CODA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CLPS and MNDO each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.8x trailing earnings, MNDO trades at a 76% valuation discount to CODA's 32.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MNDO's 5.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CODA's 17.9x.
| Metric | YYGHYY Group Holding … | CODACoda Octopus Grou… | CLPSCLPS Incorporation | MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $67M | $134M | $25M | $21M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $72M | $106M | $31M | $13M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.33x | 32.16x | -3.48x | 7.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.45x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 7.51x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 17.85x | — | 5.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.64x | 5.05x | 0.15x | 1.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.13x | 2.30x | 0.43x | 0.90x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 22.20x | — | 5.20x |
Evenly matched — CLPS and MNDO each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MNDO delivers a 11.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-64 for YYGH. CODA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to YYGH's 0.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CODA scores 7/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | YYGHYY Group Holding … | CODACoda Octopus Grou… | CLPSCLPS Incorporation | MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -64.3% | +7.2% | -6.1% | +11.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -25.9% | +6.6% | -3.2% | +8.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -35.4% | +11.2% | -7.9% | +8.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -68.4% | +8.1% | -9.8% | +7.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.81x | 0.01x | 0.59x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | -$28M | $6M | -$7M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $836,907 | $29M | $28M | $8M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $394,932 | $34M | $929,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9.23x | — | — | — |
CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CODA five years ago would be worth $14,969 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $77 for YYGH. Over the past 12 months, CODA leads with a +78.9% total return vs YYGH's -98.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CODA at 10.4% vs YYGH's -80.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | YYGHYY Group Holding … | CODACoda Octopus Grou… | CLPSCLPS Incorporation | MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -89.7% | +25.1% | -10.3% | -13.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -98.1% | +78.9% | -5.4% | -34.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | +34.5% | +0.5% | -24.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | +49.7% | -69.3% | -35.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | +844.4% | -78.5% | +66.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -80.2% | +10.4% | +0.2% | -8.8% |
CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CODA and MNDO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MNDO is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than YYGH's 2.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CODA currently trades 68.9% from its 52-week high vs YYGH's 0.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | YYGHYY Group Holding … | CODACoda Octopus Grou… | CLPSCLPS Incorporation | MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.22x | 1.00x | 0.27x | 0.07x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $172.50 | $17.28 | $1.88 | $1.64 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.20 | $5.98 | $0.80 | $0.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.6% | +68.9% | +48.2% | +61.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.3 | 48.6 | 49.8 | 27.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 899K | 256K | 15K | 37K |
Evenly matched — CODA and MNDO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CLPS and MNDO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, MNDO offers the higher dividend yield at 21.61% vs CLPS's 14.60%.
| Metric | YYGHYY Group Holding … | CODACoda Octopus Grou… | CLPSCLPS Incorporation | MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $14.00 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +14.6% | +21.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.13 | $0.22 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.6% |
Evenly matched — CLPS and MNDO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
CODA leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
Best OverallCoda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
YYGH vs CODA vs CLPS vs MNDO: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is YYGH or CODA or CLPS or MNDO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the stronger pick with 30. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 3% for MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO). MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO) offers the better valuation at 7. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — YYGH or CODA or CLPS or MNDO?
On trailing P/E, MIND C.
T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the cheapest at 7. 8x versus Coda Octopus Group, Inc. at 32. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — YYGH or CODA or CLPS or MNDO?
Over the past 5 years, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) delivered a total return of +49. 7%, compared to -99. 2% for YY Group Holding Limited (YYGH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CODA returned +844. 4% versus YYGH's -99. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — YYGH or CODA or CLPS or MNDO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MIND C.
T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 07β versus YY Group Holding Limited's 2. 22β — meaning YYGH is approximately 3119% more volatile than MNDO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 81% for YY Group Holding Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — YYGH or CODA or CLPS or MNDO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is pulling ahead at 30. 7% versus -9. 3% for MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Coda Octopus Group, Inc. grew EPS 15. 6% year-over-year, compared to -633. 3% for YY Group Holding Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, YYGH leads at 33. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — YYGH or CODA or CLPS or MNDO?
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus -11. 8% for YY Group Holding Limited — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CODA leads at 17. 1% versus -10. 1% for YYGH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CODA leads at 66. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — YYGH or CODA or CLPS or MNDO?
In this comparison, MNDO (21.
6% yield), CLPS (14. 6% yield) pay a dividend. YYGH, CODA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is YYGH or CODA or CLPS or MNDO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MIND C.
T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 07), 21. 6% yield). YY Group Holding Limited (YYGH) carries a higher beta of 2. 22 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MNDO: +66. 7%, YYGH: -99. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between YYGH and CODA and CLPS and MNDO?
These companies operate in different sectors (YYGH (Consumer Cyclical) and CODA (Industrials) and CLPS (Technology) and MNDO (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: YYGH is a small-cap high-growth stock; CODA is a small-cap high-growth stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; MNDO is a small-cap deep-value stock. CLPS, MNDO pay a dividend while YYGH, CODA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(YYGH: 20.6% · CODA: 28.8%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.