Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
Z vs COMP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Z vs COMP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $10.47B | $4.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.48B | $8.31B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-32M | $14M |
| Gross Margin | 74.9% | 10.8% |
| Operating Margin | -3.7% | -4.2% |
| Forward P/E | 19.7x | 44.4x |
| Total Debt | $93M | $454M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $768M | $199M |
Z vs COMP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zillow Group, Inc. … (Z) | 100 | 33.5 | -66.5% |
| Compass, Inc. (COMP) | 100 | 38.2 | -61.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: Z vs COMP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Z is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.32
- Rev growth 15.5%, EPS growth 118.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.7%
- 62.9% 10Y total return vs COMP's -64.0%
COMP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.
- 23.7% revenue growth vs Z's 15.5%
- 0.2% margin vs Z's -1.3%
- -8.2% vs Z's -36.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.7% revenue growth vs Z's 15.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.7x vs 44.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.2% margin vs Z's -1.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.32 vs COMP's 1.79, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -8.2% vs Z's -36.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.4% ROA vs Z's -0.6%, ROIC -2.5% vs -0.6% |
Z vs COMP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Z vs COMP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Z leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COMP is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.3B annually — 3.3x Z's $2.5B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 0.2% (COMP) to -1.3% (Z). On growth, COMP holds the edge at +99.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.5B | $8.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $187M | -$100M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$32M | $14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $264M | $16M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.9% | +10.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.7% | -4.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.3% | +0.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.6% | +0.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.4% | +99.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +145.3% | +133.3% |
Valuation Metrics
COMP leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.5B | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.8B | $4.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 483.78x | -72.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.65x | 44.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 51.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.05x | 0.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.27x | 5.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 44.55x | 20.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Z leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
COMP delivers a 1.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-1 for Z. Z carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COMP's 0.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), Z scores 7/9 vs COMP's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.6% | +1.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.6% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.6% | -2.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.7% | -2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$675M | $255M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $768M | $199M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $93M | $454M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.38x | -0.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
COMP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in COMP five years ago would be worth $4,248 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,826 for Z. Over the past 12 months, COMP leads with a -8.2% total return vs Z's -36.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COMP at 42.9% vs Z's -3.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -34.0% | -30.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -36.1% | -8.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.6% | +191.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.7% | -57.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.9% | -64.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.7% | +42.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — Z and COMP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Z is the less volatile stock with a 1.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COMP's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. COMP currently trades 52.0% from its 52-week high vs Z's 46.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.32x | 1.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $93.88 | $13.96 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $39.05 | $5.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +46.4% | +52.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.0 | 38.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.6M | 14.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates Z as "Hold" and COMP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 96.8% upside for COMP (target: $14) vs 83.7% for Z (target: $80).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $80.00 | $14.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 46 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.4% | 0.0% |
Z leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). COMP leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
Z vs COMP: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is Z or COMP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Compass, Inc.
(COMP) is the stronger pick with 23. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 15. 5% for Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (Z). Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (Z) offers the better valuation at 483. 8x trailing P/E (19. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Compass, Inc. (COMP) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — Z or COMP?
On forward P/E, Zillow Group, Inc.
Class C is actually cheaper at 19. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — Z or COMP?
Over the past 5 years, Compass, Inc.
(COMP) delivered a total return of -57. 5%, compared to -61. 7% for Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (Z). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: Z returned +62. 9% versus COMP's -64. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — Z or COMP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Zillow Group, Inc.
Class C (Z) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 32β versus Compass, Inc. 's 1. 79β — meaning COMP is approximately 36% more volatile than Z relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (Z) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 58% for Compass, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — Z or COMP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Compass, Inc.
(COMP) is pulling ahead at 23. 7% versus 15. 5% for Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (Z). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Zillow Group, Inc. Class C grew EPS 118. 8% year-over-year, compared to 67. 7% for Compass, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, Z leads at 9. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — Z or COMP?
Zillow Group, Inc.
Class C (Z) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 9% net margin versus -0. 8% for Compass, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: COMP leads at -0. 4% versus -1. 3% for Z. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — Z leads at 74. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is Z or COMP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Zillow Group, Inc.
Class C (Z) trades at 19. 7x forward P/E versus 44. 4x for Compass, Inc. — 24. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COMP: 96. 8% to $14. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — Z or COMP?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is Z or COMP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Zillow Group, Inc.
Class C (Z) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Compass, Inc. (COMP) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (Z: +62. 9%, COMP: -64. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between Z and COMP?
These companies operate in different sectors (Z (Communication Services) and COMP (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 8%
- Gross Margin > 44%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.