Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

Z vs COMP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
Z
Zillow Group, Inc. Class C

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$10.47B
5Y Perf.-66.5%
COMP
Compass, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.08B
5Y Perf.-61.8%

Z vs COMP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
Z logoZ
COMP logoCOMP
IndustryInternet Content & InformationSoftware - Application
Market Cap$10.47B$4.08B
Revenue (TTM)$2.48B$8.31B
Net Income (TTM)$-32M$14M
Gross Margin74.9%10.8%
Operating Margin-3.7%-4.2%
Forward P/E19.7x44.4x
Total Debt$93M$454M
Cash & Equiv.$768M$199M

Z vs COMPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

Z
COMP
StockApr 21May 26Return
Zillow Group, Inc. … (Z)10033.5-66.5%
Compass, Inc. (COMP)10038.2-61.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: Z vs COMP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: COMP leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Zillow Group, Inc. Class C is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
Z
Zillow Group, Inc. Class C
The Income Pick

Z is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • beta 1.32
  • Rev growth 15.5%, EPS growth 118.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.7%
  • 62.9% 10Y total return vs COMP's -64.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
COMP
Compass, Inc.
The Growth Leader

COMP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.

  • 23.7% revenue growth vs Z's 15.5%
  • 0.2% margin vs Z's -1.3%
  • -8.2% vs Z's -36.1%
Best for: growth and quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCOMP logoCOMP23.7% revenue growth vs Z's 15.5%
ValueZ logoZLower P/E (19.7x vs 44.4x)
Quality / MarginsCOMP logoCOMP0.2% margin vs Z's -1.3%
Stability / SafetyZ logoZBeta 1.32 vs COMP's 1.79, lower leverage
DividendsTieNeither stock pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)COMP logoCOMP-8.2% vs Z's -36.1%
Efficiency (ROA)COMP logoCOMP0.4% ROA vs Z's -0.6%, ROIC -2.5% vs -0.6%

Z vs COMP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ZZillow Group, Inc. Class C
FY 2025
Sales Revenue
44.9%$1.9B
Residential Revenue
40.2%$1.7B
Rental Revenue
14.9%$630M
COMPCompass, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

Z vs COMP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLZLAGGINGCOMP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Z leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

COMP is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.3B annually — 3.3x Z's $2.5B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 0.2% (COMP) to -1.3% (Z). On growth, COMP holds the edge at +99.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricZ logoZZillow Group, Inc…COMP logoCOMPCompass, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.5B$8.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$187M-$100M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$32M$14M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$264M$16M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+74.9%+10.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-3.7%-4.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-1.3%+0.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+10.6%+0.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+16.4%+99.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+145.3%+133.3%
Z leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

COMP leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
MetricZ logoZZillow Group, Inc…COMP logoCOMPCompass, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$10.5B$4.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$9.8B$4.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS483.78x-72.60x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.19.65x44.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple51.99x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.05x0.59x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.27x5.27x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF44.55x20.07x
COMP leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Z leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

COMP delivers a 1.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-1 for Z. Z carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COMP's 0.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), Z scores 7/9 vs COMP's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricZ logoZZillow Group, Inc…COMP logoCOMPCompass, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-0.6%+1.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-0.6%+0.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital-0.6%-2.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-0.7%-2.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–974
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.02x0.58x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$675M$255M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$768M$199M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$93M$454M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.38x-0.12x
Z leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

COMP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in COMP five years ago would be worth $4,248 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,826 for Z. Over the past 12 months, COMP leads with a -8.2% total return vs Z's -36.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COMP at 42.9% vs Z's -3.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricZ logoZZillow Group, Inc…COMP logoCOMPCompass, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-34.0%-30.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-36.1%-8.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-10.6%+191.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-61.7%-57.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+62.9%-64.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-3.7%+42.9%
COMP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — Z and COMP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Z is the less volatile stock with a 1.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COMP's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. COMP currently trades 52.0% from its 52-week high vs Z's 46.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricZ logoZZillow Group, Inc…COMP logoCOMPCompass, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.32x1.79x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$93.88$13.96
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$39.05$5.66
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+46.4%+52.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10049.038.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3.6M14.1M
Evenly matched — Z and COMP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates Z as "Hold" and COMP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 96.8% upside for COMP (target: $14) vs 83.7% for Z (target: $80).

MetricZ logoZZillow Group, Inc…COMP logoCOMPCompass, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$80.00$14.29
# AnalystsCovering analysts4610
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+6.4%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

Z leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). COMP leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallZillow Group, Inc. Class C (Z)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

Z vs COMP: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is Z or COMP a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Compass, Inc.

(COMP) is the stronger pick with 23. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 15. 5% for Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (Z). Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (Z) offers the better valuation at 483. 8x trailing P/E (19. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Compass, Inc. (COMP) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — Z or COMP?

On forward P/E, Zillow Group, Inc.

Class C is actually cheaper at 19. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — Z or COMP?

Over the past 5 years, Compass, Inc.

(COMP) delivered a total return of -57. 5%, compared to -61. 7% for Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (Z). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: Z returned +62. 9% versus COMP's -64. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — Z or COMP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Zillow Group, Inc.

Class C (Z) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 32β versus Compass, Inc. 's 1. 79β — meaning COMP is approximately 36% more volatile than Z relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (Z) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 58% for Compass, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — Z or COMP?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Compass, Inc.

(COMP) is pulling ahead at 23. 7% versus 15. 5% for Zillow Group, Inc. Class C (Z). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Zillow Group, Inc. Class C grew EPS 118. 8% year-over-year, compared to 67. 7% for Compass, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, Z leads at 9. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — Z or COMP?

Zillow Group, Inc.

Class C (Z) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 9% net margin versus -0. 8% for Compass, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: COMP leads at -0. 4% versus -1. 3% for Z. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — Z leads at 74. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is Z or COMP more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Zillow Group, Inc.

Class C (Z) trades at 19. 7x forward P/E versus 44. 4x for Compass, Inc. — 24. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COMP: 96. 8% to $14. 29.

08

Which pays a better dividend — Z or COMP?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is Z or COMP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Zillow Group, Inc.

Class C (Z) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Compass, Inc. (COMP) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (Z: +62. 9%, COMP: -64. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between Z and COMP?

These companies operate in different sectors (Z (Communication Services) and COMP (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

Z

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Gross Margin > 44%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

COMP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 49%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform Z and COMP on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(Z: 16.4% · COMP: 99.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.