Investment - Banking & Investment Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ZBAI vs HUYA vs NTES vs DOYU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Internet Content & Information
ZBAI vs HUYA vs NTES vs DOYU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Investment - Banking & Investment Services | Entertainment | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $142M | $481M | $74.15B | $142M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $6.11B | $112.25B | $4.20B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $-153M | $33.67B | $-202M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 12.7% | 64.3% | 9.2% |
| Operating Margin | -70.2% | -3.4% | 31.8% | -7.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 4.0x | 1.9x | 4.3x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $49M | $6.39B | $16M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $1.19B | $51.52B | $1.02B |
ZBAI vs HUYA vs NTES vs DOYU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ATIF Holdings Ltd. (ZBAI) | 100 | 70.4 | -29.6% |
| HUYA Inc. (HUYA) | 100 | 99.4 | -0.6% |
| NetEase, Inc. (NTES) | 100 | 133.9 | +33.9% |
| DouYu International… (DOYU) | 100 | 41.1 | -58.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZBAI vs HUYA vs NTES vs DOYU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ZBAI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 93.5%, EPS growth 13.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.49, current ratio 13.45x
- 93.5% NII/revenue growth vs DOYU's -22.8%
- Beta 0.49 vs HUYA's 1.17
HUYA is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +26.9% vs ZBAI's -50.8%
NTES carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 375.8% 10Y total return vs ZBAI's -32.2%
- Lower P/E (1.9x vs 4.3x)
- 30.0% margin vs ZBAI's -383.2%
- 2.6% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs DOYU's 100.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
DOYU is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.10, yield 100.0%
- Beta 1.10, yield 100.0%, current ratio 3.63x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 93.5% NII/revenue growth vs DOYU's -22.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.9x vs 4.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.0% margin vs ZBAI's -383.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.49 vs HUYA's 1.17 | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs DOYU's 100.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.9% vs ZBAI's -50.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs ZBAI's -54.6%, ROIC 23.3% vs -11.0% |
ZBAI vs HUYA vs NTES vs DOYU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ZBAI vs HUYA vs NTES vs DOYU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NTES leads in 2 of 6 categories
DOYU leads 1 • ZBAI leads 0 • HUYA leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTES leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTES is the larger business by revenue, generating $112.2B annually — 93538.0x ZBAI's $1M. NTES is the more profitable business, keeping 30.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ZBAI's -3.8%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $6.1B | $112.2B | $4.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$981,120 | -$120M | $38.0B | -$275M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | -$153M | $33.7B | -$202M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $0 | $48.5B | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +12.7% | +64.3% | +9.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -70.2% | -3.4% | +31.8% | -7.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | -2.5% | +30.0% | -4.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | -1.9% | +43.2% | -5.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +1.7% | +1.6% | +2.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +62.3% | -118.5% | -30.4% | +179.1% |
Valuation Metrics
DOYU leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $142M | $481M | $74.2B | $142M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $133M | $314M | $67.5B | -$5M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -30.52x | -103.70x | 15.63x | -3.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 3.97x | 1.86x | 4.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.67x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 12.40x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 118.43x | 0.54x | 4.61x | 0.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 14.71x | 0.67x | 3.10x | 0.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 10.44x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NTES leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NTES delivers a 20.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-59 for ZBAI. DOYU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NTES's 0.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTES scores 8/9 vs DOYU's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -59.4% | -2.4% | +20.4% | -6.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -54.6% | -1.7% | +15.2% | -4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -11.0% | -1.7% | +23.3% | -15.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -14.4% | -2.1% | +22.1% | -10.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 8 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.01x | 0.04x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$9M | -$1.1B | -$45.1B | -$1.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $1.2B | $51.5B | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $49M | $6.4B | $16M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -46797.17x | — | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — NTES and DOYU each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NTES five years ago would be worth $11,631 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,841 for DOYU. Over the past 12 months, HUYA leads with a +26.9% total return vs ZBAI's -50.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DOYU at 31.1% vs ZBAI's -12.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.4% | +5.6% | -19.8% | -31.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -50.8% | +26.9% | +12.8% | -34.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.2% | +99.7% | +37.4% | +125.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.2% | -60.8% | +16.3% | -71.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.2% | -60.1% | +375.8% | -78.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.2% | +25.9% | +11.2% | +31.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ZBAI and NTES each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ZBAI is the less volatile stock with a 0.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HUYA's 1.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NTES currently trades 73.4% from its 52-week high vs ZBAI's 41.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.49x | 1.17x | 0.74x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.80 | $4.93 | $159.55 | $9.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.14 | $2.21 | $103.23 | $4.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +41.6% | +64.9% | +73.4% | +50.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.9 | 54.2 | 58.5 | 47.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6K | 1.0M | 750K | 26K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NTES and DOYU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HUYA as "Buy", NTES as "Buy", DOYU as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 92.1% upside for DOYU (target: $9) vs 7.8% for HUYA (target: $3). For income investors, DOYU offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs NTES's 2.62%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.45 | $149.75 | $9.03 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 32 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +56.7% | +2.6% | +100.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 4 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $12.34 | $20.90 | $68.16 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +7.6% | +0.1% | +10.9% |
NTES leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DOYU leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
ZBAI vs HUYA vs NTES vs DOYU: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZBAI or HUYA or NTES or DOYU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ATIF Holdings Ltd.
(ZBAI) is the stronger pick with 93. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 8% for DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU). NetEase, Inc. (NTES) offers the better valuation at 15. 6x trailing P/E (1. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate HUYA Inc. (HUYA) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ZBAI or HUYA or NTES or DOYU?
On forward P/E, NetEase, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 1. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ZBAI or HUYA or NTES or DOYU?
Over the past 5 years, NetEase, Inc.
(NTES) delivered a total return of +16. 3%, compared to -71. 6% for DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTES returned +375. 8% versus DOYU's -78. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ZBAI or HUYA or NTES or DOYU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ATIF Holdings Ltd.
(ZBAI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 49β versus HUYA Inc. 's 1. 17β — meaning HUYA is approximately 140% more volatile than ZBAI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 4% for NetEase, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ZBAI or HUYA or NTES or DOYU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ATIF Holdings Ltd.
(ZBAI) is pulling ahead at 93. 5% versus -22. 8% for DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HUYA Inc. grew EPS 75. 0% year-over-year, compared to -969. 4% for DouYu International Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTES leads at 4. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ZBAI or HUYA or NTES or DOYU?
NetEase, Inc.
(NTES) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 0% net margin versus -383. 2% for ATIF Holdings Ltd. — meaning it keeps 30. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NTES leads at 31. 8% versus -70. 2% for ZBAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZBAI leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ZBAI or HUYA or NTES or DOYU more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, NetEase, Inc.
(NTES) trades at 1. 9x forward P/E versus 4. 3x for DouYu International Holdings Limited — 2. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DOYU: 92. 1% to $9. 03.
08Which pays a better dividend — ZBAI or HUYA or NTES or DOYU?
In this comparison, DOYU (100.
0% yield), HUYA (56. 7% yield), NTES (2. 6% yield) pay a dividend. ZBAI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ZBAI or HUYA or NTES or DOYU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NetEase, Inc.
(NTES) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 2. 6% yield, +375. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTES: +375. 8%, HUYA: -60. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ZBAI and HUYA and NTES and DOYU?
These companies operate in different sectors (ZBAI (Financial Services) and HUYA (Communication Services) and NTES (Technology) and DOYU (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ZBAI is a small-cap high-growth stock; HUYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NTES is a mid-cap deep-value stock; DOYU is a small-cap income-oriented stock. HUYA, NTES, DOYU pay a dividend while ZBAI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.