Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ZBIO vs ARCT vs MRNA vs BNTX vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Banks - Diversified
ZBIO vs ARCT vs MRNA vs BNTX vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $793M | $198M | $19.69B | $22.64B | $875.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $45M | $2.23B | $2.86B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-425M | $-79M | $-3.19B | $-1.13B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 91.2% | -13.9% | 77.7% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | -21.1% | -196.7% | -153.3% | -45.9% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $80M | $25M | $1.92B | $267M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $111M | $231M | $2.60B | $7.67B | $343.34B |
ZBIO vs ARCT vs MRNA vs BNTX vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zenas BioPharma, In… (ZBIO) | 100 | 117.0 | +17.0% |
| Arcturus Therapeuti… (ARCT) | 100 | 30.0 | -70.0% |
| Moderna, Inc. (MRNA) | 100 | 74.7 | -25.3% |
| BioNTech SE (BNTX) | 100 | 76.2 | -23.8% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 152.1 | +52.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZBIO vs ARCT vs MRNA vs BNTX vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ZBIO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- 100.0% revenue growth vs ARCT's -51.4%
ARCT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MRNA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +78.9% vs ARCT's -44.0%
BNTX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.98, Low D/E 1.4%, current ratio 7.54x
- Beta 0.98, current ratio 7.54x
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 1.9%
- Rev growth 3.3%, EPS growth 1.5%
- 454.4% 10Y total return vs BNTX's 5.4%
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 100.0% revenue growth vs ARCT's -51.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs ZBIO's -37.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.95 vs ARCT's 2.56 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +78.9% vs ARCT's -44.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.3% ROA vs ZBIO's -97.4%, ROIC 4.5% vs -154.5% |
ZBIO vs ARCT vs MRNA vs BNTX vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ZBIO vs ARCT vs MRNA vs BNTX vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 5 of 6 categories
ARCT leads 1 • ZBIO leads 0 • MRNA leads 0 • BNTX leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and ZBIO operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ZBIO's -37.8%. On growth, MRNA holds the edge at +2.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $45M | $2.2B | $2.9B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$423M | -$86M | -$3.2B | -$931M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$425M | -$79M | -$3.2B | -$1.1B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$210M | -$59M | -$1.6B | $277M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +91.2% | -13.9% | +77.7% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -21.1% | -196.7% | -153.3% | -45.9% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -37.8% | -173.5% | -143.6% | -39.6% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -17.2% | -129.9% | -71.1% | +9.7% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -97.9% | +2.6% | -24.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -82.5% | -82.7% | -34.9% | -2.1% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ARCT leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $793M | $198M | $19.7B | $22.6B | $875.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $762M | -$8M | $19.0B | $14.1B | $1.47T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.10x | -2.90x | -6.84x | -17.19x | 15.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 14.08x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.20x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 18.11x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 79.29x | 2.95x | 10.13x | 7.11x | 3.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.28x | 0.89x | 2.23x | 0.98x | 2.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 72.68x | 8.68x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-168 for ZBIO. BNTX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JPM scores 5/9 vs ARCT's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -167.7% | -36.6% | -36.7% | -6.0% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -97.4% | -28.4% | -26.6% | -5.3% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -154.5% | -2.8% | -26.1% | -4.3% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -66.7% | -29.2% | -27.6% | -3.1% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.33x | 0.12x | 0.22x | 0.01x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$31M | -$206M | -$679M | -$7.4B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $111M | $231M | $2.6B | $7.7B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $80M | $25M | $1.9B | $267M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -62.50x | — | -1803.00x | -62.15x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $20,999 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,027 for ARCT. Over the past 12 months, MRNA leads with a +78.9% total return vs ARCT's -44.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 32.6% vs ARCT's -36.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -48.5% | +11.5% | +60.9% | -7.4% | -2.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.7% | -44.0% | +78.9% | -15.1% | +19.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.2% | -74.6% | -59.8% | -18.4% | +133.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.2% | -79.7% | -77.3% | -61.6% | +110.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.2% | -79.4% | +166.9% | +543.6% | +454.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.4% | -36.6% | -26.2% | -6.6% | +32.6% |
Risk & Volatility
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARCT's 2.56 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 93.0% from its 52-week high vs ARCT's 28.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.31x | 2.46x | 1.82x | 1.01x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.60 | $24.17 | $59.55 | $124.00 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.91 | $5.85 | $22.28 | $79.52 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +39.8% | +28.8% | +83.4% | +72.2% | +93.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.8 | 38.3 | 43.5 | 36.9 | 54.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 530K | 402K | 6.2M | 880K | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ZBIO as "Buy", ARCT as "Buy", MRNA as "Hold", BNTX as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 222.8% upside for ARCT (target: $23) vs -18.8% for MRNA (target: $40). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.90% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $35.00 | $22.50 | $40.29 | $132.33 | $338.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 21 | 27 | 24 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.9% |
JPM leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ARCT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
ZBIO vs ARCT vs MRNA vs BNTX vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZBIO or ARCT or MRNA or BNTX or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Zenas BioPharma, Inc.
(ZBIO) is the stronger pick with 100. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -51. 4% for Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings Inc. (ARCT). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 15. 6x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Zenas BioPharma, Inc. (ZBIO) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ZBIO or ARCT or MRNA or BNTX or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +110. 0%, compared to -79. 7% for Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings Inc. (ARCT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BNTX returned +550. 6% versus ARCT's -79. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ZBIO or ARCT or MRNA or BNTX or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings Inc. 's 2. 46β — meaning ARCT is approximately 161% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BioNTech SE (BNTX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ZBIO or ARCT or MRNA or BNTX or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Zenas BioPharma, Inc.
(ZBIO) is pulling ahead at 100. 0% versus -51. 4% for Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings Inc. (ARCT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Moderna, Inc. grew EPS 21. 7% year-over-year, compared to -124. 5% for Zenas BioPharma, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARCT leads at -31. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ZBIO or ARCT or MRNA or BNTX or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -37. 8% for Zenas BioPharma, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus -21. 1% for ZBIO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZBIO leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ZBIO or ARCT or MRNA or BNTX or JPM more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ARCT: 222.
8% to $22. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — ZBIO or ARCT or MRNA or BNTX or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. ZBIO, ARCT, MRNA, BNTX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is ZBIO or ARCT or MRNA or BNTX or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings Inc. (ARCT) carries a higher beta of 2. 46 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, ARCT: -79. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ZBIO and ARCT and MRNA and BNTX and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (ZBIO (Healthcare) and ARCT (Healthcare) and MRNA (Healthcare) and BNTX (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ZBIO is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARCT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MRNA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BNTX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while ZBIO, ARCT, MRNA, BNTX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.