Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ZCMD vs CNET vs BTBT vs RCON
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Advertising Agencies
Financial - Capital Markets
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
ZCMD vs CNET vs BTBT vs RCON — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Advertising Agencies | Financial - Capital Markets | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $7M | $2M | $622M | $18M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $27M | $6M | $164M | $66M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-2M | $137M | $-43M |
| Gross Margin | 51.0% | 4.8% | 61.9% | 23.0% |
| Operating Margin | -24.0% | -31.7% | 16.8% | -86.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 9.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $26K | $122K | $14M | $34M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $812K | $95M | $99M |
ZCMD vs CNET vs BTBT vs RCON — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zhongchao Inc. (ZCMD) | 100 | 1.3 | -98.7% |
| ZW Data Action Tech… (CNET) | 100 | 4.2 | -95.8% |
| Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) | 100 | 202.1 | +102.1% |
| Recon Technology, L… (RCON) | 100 | 2.7 | -97.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZCMD vs CNET vs BTBT vs RCON
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ZCMD is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.21, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 11.11x
CNET lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
- -58.2% 10Y total return vs CNET's -97.8%
- 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs CNET's -49.5%
- 17.3% margin vs RCON's -64.3%
RCON is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.47
- Beta 0.47, current ratio 5.88x
- Beta 0.47 vs BTBT's 3.37
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs CNET's -49.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.3% margin vs RCON's -64.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs BTBT's 3.37 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -4.0% vs ZCMD's -78.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.0% ROA vs ZCMD's -27.7%, ROIC 6.5% vs -30.1% |
ZCMD vs CNET vs BTBT vs RCON — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ZCMD vs CNET vs BTBT vs RCON — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BTBT leads in 3 of 6 categories
RCON leads 2 • ZCMD leads 0 • CNET leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTBT is the larger business by revenue, generating $164M annually — 26.6x CNET's $6M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RCON's -64.3%. On growth, RCON holds the edge at +2.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $27M | $6M | $164M | $66M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | -$2M | $166M | -$54M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | -$2M | $137M | -$43M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | -$2M | -$448M | -$44M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.0% | +4.8% | +61.9% | +23.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -24.0% | -31.7% | +16.8% | -86.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -25.5% | -33.4% | +17.3% | -64.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -14.0% | -27.3% | -65.3% | -65.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -23.2% | -47.0% | — | +2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.3% | +95.7% | +2.8% | +35.7% |
Valuation Metrics
RCON leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $2M | $622M | $18M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$925,224 | $1M | $540M | $8M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.20x | -0.40x | 9.65x | -1.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 9.02x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.63x | 0.13x | 3.80x | 1.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.34x | 0.41x | 0.59x | 0.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.32x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-60 for CNET. ZCMD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RCON's 0.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs ZCMD's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -30.5% | -60.3% | +21.4% | -9.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -27.7% | -21.3% | +19.0% | -8.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -30.1% | -64.7% | +6.5% | -10.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -26.3% | -73.5% | +8.5% | -11.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.03x | 0.03x | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | -$690,000 | -$81M | -$64M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $812,000 | $95M | $99M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $26,083 | $122,000 | $14M | $34M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | -372.30x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BTBT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BTBT five years ago would be worth $1,660 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $58 for RCON. Over the past 12 months, BTBT leads with a -4.0% total return vs ZCMD's -78.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BTBT at -5.4% vs ZCMD's -70.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -42.5% | -40.7% | -5.4% | -42.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -78.7% | -53.6% | -4.0% | -49.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.4% | -88.2% | -15.4% | -88.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.4% | -97.8% | -83.4% | -99.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.3% | -97.8% | -58.2% | -99.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -70.5% | -51.0% | -5.4% | -50.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BTBT and RCON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RCON is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BTBT currently trades 42.4% from its 52-week high vs RCON's 12.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.21x | 1.18x | 3.37x | 0.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.18 | $2.78 | $4.55 | $7.16 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.43 | $0.57 | $1.25 | $0.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +18.2% | +26.9% | +42.4% | +12.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.1 | 51.0 | 63.9 | 43.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15K | 11K | 18.5M | 90K |
Analyst Outlook
RCON leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $5.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 2 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.01 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BTBT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RCON leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
ZCMD vs CNET vs BTBT vs RCON: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZCMD or CNET or BTBT or RCON a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 5% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ZCMD or CNET or BTBT or RCON?
Over the past 5 years, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) delivered a total return of -83. 4%, compared to -99. 4% for Recon Technology, Ltd. (RCON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BTBT returned -58. 2% versus ZCMD's -99. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ZCMD or CNET or BTBT or RCON?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Recon Technology, Ltd.
(RCON) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning BTBT is approximately 619% more volatile than RCON relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Zhongchao Inc. (ZCMD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 8% for Recon Technology, Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ZCMD or CNET or BTBT or RCON?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -49. 5% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -124. 1% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ZCMD leads at -7. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ZCMD or CNET or BTBT or RCON?
Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -64. 3% for Recon Technology, Ltd. — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at 16. 8% versus -86. 5% for RCON. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTBT leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ZCMD or CNET or BTBT or RCON?
In this comparison, BTBT (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. ZCMD, CNET, RCON do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is ZCMD or CNET or BTBT or RCON better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Recon Technology, Ltd.
(RCON) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 47)). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RCON: -99. 2%, BTBT: -58. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ZCMD and CNET and BTBT and RCON?
These companies operate in different sectors (ZCMD (Healthcare) and CNET (Communication Services) and BTBT (Financial Services) and RCON (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ZCMD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CNET is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; RCON is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.