ZENA vs RCAT

For growth investors, ZenaTech, Inc.

(ZENA) is the stronger pick with 557. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 459. 8% for Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT). Analysts rate Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Red Cat Holdings, Inc.

(RCAT) delivered a total return of +169. 8%, compared to -76. 1% for ZenaTech, Inc. (ZENA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ZENA returned -76. 1% versus RCAT's -97. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ZenaTech, Inc.

(ZENA) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 26β versus Red Cat Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 31β — meaning RCAT is approximately 47% more volatile than ZENA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 32% for ZenaTech, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ZenaTech, Inc.

(ZENA) is pulling ahead at 557. 6% versus 459. 8% for Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Red Cat Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 29. 4% year-over-year, compared to -450. 0% for ZenaTech, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCAT leads at 106. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Red Cat Holdings, Inc.

(RCAT) is the more profitable company, earning -177. 0% net margin versus -350. 2% for ZenaTech, Inc. — meaning it keeps -177. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RCAT leads at -163. 5% versus -196. 1% for ZENA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCAT leads at 3. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, ZenaTech, Inc.

(ZENA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) carries a higher beta of 3. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ZENA: -76. 1%, RCAT: -97. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.