Steel
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ZEUS vs RS vs SSD vs SXC vs STLD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Steel
Construction
Coal
Steel
ZEUS vs RS vs SSD vs SXC vs STLD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Steel | Steel | Construction | Coal | Steel |
| Market Cap | $533M | $19.01B | $7.87B | $602M | $34.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.90B | $14.84B | $2.38B | $1.86B | $19.01B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $806M | $355M | $-66M | $1.37B |
| Gross Margin | 82.8% | 27.2% | 45.5% | 6.5% | 14.0% |
| Operating Margin | 1.9% | 7.5% | 19.7% | 2.1% | 9.4% |
| Forward P/E | 20.7x | 19.1x | 21.0x | 19.5x | 15.9x |
| Total Debt | $313M | $1.99B | $488M | $686M | $4.21B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $217M | $384M | $89M | $770M |
ZEUS vs RS vs SSD vs SXC vs STLD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS) | 100 | 433.9 | +333.9% |
| Reliance Steel & Al… (RS) | 100 | 339.7 | +239.7% |
| Simpson Manufacturi… (SSD) | 100 | 220.8 | +120.8% |
| SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC) | 100 | 230.5 | +130.5% |
| Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) | 100 | 676.1 | +576.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZEUS vs RS vs SSD vs SXC vs STLD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ZEUS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.49 vs SSD's 1.49
- Lower P/E (20.7x vs 21.0x), PEG 0.49 vs 1.49
RS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 0.75, yield 1.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.75, Low D/E 27.7%, current ratio 4.88x
- Beta 0.75, yield 1.3%, current ratio 4.88x
- Beta 0.75 vs ZEUS's 1.48, lower leverage
SSD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 4.5%, EPS growth 8.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.3%
- 4.5% revenue growth vs ZEUS's -10.0%
- 14.9% margin vs SXC's -3.5%
- 11.7% ROA vs SXC's -3.7%, ROIC 15.9% vs 4.3%
SXC is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 6.8% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs RS's 1.3%
STLD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 9.0% 10Y total return vs RS's 450.7%
- +79.9% vs SXC's -15.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.5% revenue growth vs ZEUS's -10.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.7x vs 21.0x), PEG 0.49 vs 1.49 | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.9% margin vs SXC's -3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.75 vs ZEUS's 1.48, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.8% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs RS's 1.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +79.9% vs SXC's -15.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.7% ROA vs SXC's -3.7%, ROIC 15.9% vs 4.3% |
ZEUS vs RS vs SSD vs SXC vs STLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ZEUS vs RS vs SSD vs SXC vs STLD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SSD leads in 2 of 6 categories
SXC leads 1 • STLD leads 1 • RS leads 1 • ZEUS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SSD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STLD is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.0B annually — 10.2x SXC's $1.9B. SSD is the more profitable business, keeping 14.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SXC's -3.5%. On growth, STLD holds the edge at +19.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $14.8B | $2.4B | $1.9B | $19.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $45M | $1.4B | $563M | $208M | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | $806M | $355M | -$66M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $42M | $612M | $338M | $77M | $665M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +82.8% | +27.2% | +45.5% | +6.5% | +14.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +7.5% | +19.7% | +2.1% | +9.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +5.4% | +14.9% | -3.5% | +7.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.2% | +4.1% | +14.2% | +4.2% | +3.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.4% | +15.5% | +9.1% | +4.4% | +19.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -21.7% | +36.4% | +15.1% | -125.7% | +93.1% |
Valuation Metrics
SXC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.1x trailing earnings, SSD trades at a 22% valuation discount to STLD's 29.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ZEUS offers better value at 0.58x vs SSD's 1.64x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $533M | $19.0B | $7.9B | $602M | $34.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $834M | $20.8B | $8.0B | $1.2B | $37.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.29x | 26.61x | 23.08x | -13.65x | 29.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.72x | 19.09x | 20.96x | 19.45x | 15.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.58x | 1.34x | 1.64x | — | 1.18x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.59x | 15.98x | 15.02x | 5.45x | 18.67x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.27x | 1.33x | 3.37x | 0.33x | 1.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.97x | 2.74x | 3.92x | 0.97x | 3.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 127.14x | 37.84x | 26.63x | 14.24x | 68.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SSD leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SSD delivers a 16.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-10 for SXC. SSD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SXC's 1.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SSD scores 7/9 vs SXC's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.4% | +11.2% | +16.9% | -9.9% | +15.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +7.6% | +11.7% | -3.7% | +8.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.3% | +8.9% | +15.9% | +4.3% | +9.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.6% | +11.2% | +17.5% | +4.3% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.55x | 0.28x | 0.24x | 1.09x | 0.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $301M | $1.8B | $103M | $597M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $217M | $384M | $89M | $770M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $313M | $2.0B | $488M | $686M | $4.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.15x | 18.77x | — | 1.18x | 20.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STLD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STLD five years ago would be worth $40,972 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,697 for SXC. Over the past 12 months, STLD leads with a +79.9% total return vs SXC's -15.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STLD at 35.3% vs ZEUS's 2.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.1% | +26.2% | +15.8% | -1.5% | +35.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.8% | +27.8% | +23.7% | -15.7% | +79.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.2% | +58.3% | +54.2% | +9.2% | +147.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.4% | +128.9% | +69.3% | +17.0% | +309.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +132.4% | +450.7% | +427.8% | +35.1% | +904.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.3% | +16.5% | +15.5% | +3.0% | +35.3% |
Risk & Volatility
RS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RS is the less volatile stock with a 0.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ZEUS's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RS currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs SXC's 77.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 0.75x | 0.94x | 0.91x | 1.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $52.65 | $373.77 | $211.98 | $9.17 | $238.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $27.11 | $260.31 | $151.38 | $5.52 | $119.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.9% | +99.5% | +89.7% | +77.4% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.2 | 73.8 | 55.8 | 61.9 | 76.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 47 | 316K | 267K | 1.8M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — RS and SXC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ZEUS as "Buy", RS as "Hold", SSD as "Buy", SXC as "Buy", STLD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.8% upside for SXC (target: $9) vs -20.7% for STLD (target: $188). For income investors, SXC offers the higher dividend yield at 6.82% vs SSD's 0.60%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $41.00 | $362.00 | $214.75 | $9.00 | $188.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 27 | 8 | 17 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | +1.3% | +0.6% | +6.8% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 23 | 12 | 6 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.57 | $4.82 | $1.14 | $0.48 | $1.96 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.1% | +1.5% | 0.0% | +2.6% |
SSD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SXC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ZEUS vs RS vs SSD vs SXC vs STLD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZEUS or RS or SSD or SXC or STLD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Simpson Manufacturing Co.
, Inc. (SSD) is the stronger pick with 4. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 0% for Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS). Simpson Manufacturing Co. , Inc. (SSD) offers the better valuation at 23. 1x trailing P/E (21. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ZEUS or RS or SSD or SXC or STLD?
On trailing P/E, Simpson Manufacturing Co.
, Inc. (SSD) is the cheapest at 23. 1x versus Steel Dynamics, Inc. at 29. 7x. On forward P/E, Steel Dynamics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Olympic Steel, Inc. wins at 0. 49x versus Simpson Manufacturing Co. , Inc. 's 1. 49x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ZEUS or RS or SSD or SXC or STLD?
Over the past 5 years, Steel Dynamics, Inc.
(STLD) delivered a total return of +309. 7%, compared to +17. 0% for SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STLD returned +904. 7% versus SXC's +35. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ZEUS or RS or SSD or SXC or STLD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
(RS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 75β versus Olympic Steel, Inc. 's 1. 48β — meaning ZEUS is approximately 98% more volatile than RS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Simpson Manufacturing Co. , Inc. (SSD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 109% for SunCoke Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ZEUS or RS or SSD or SXC or STLD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Simpson Manufacturing Co.
, Inc. (SSD) is pulling ahead at 4. 5% versus -10. 0% for Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Simpson Manufacturing Co. , Inc. grew EPS 8. 4% year-over-year, compared to -146. 4% for SunCoke Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SSD leads at 3. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ZEUS or RS or SSD or SXC or STLD?
Simpson Manufacturing Co.
, Inc. (SSD) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 8% net margin versus -2. 4% for SunCoke Energy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SSD leads at 19. 0% versus 2. 5% for ZEUS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SSD leads at 45. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ZEUS or RS or SSD or SXC or STLD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 49x versus Simpson Manufacturing Co. , Inc. 's 1. 49x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) trades at 15. 9x forward P/E versus 21. 0x for Simpson Manufacturing Co. , Inc. — 5. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SXC: 26. 8% to $9. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ZEUS or RS or SSD or SXC or STLD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC) offers the highest yield at 6. 8%, versus 0. 6% for Simpson Manufacturing Co. , Inc. (SSD).
09Is ZEUS or RS or SSD or SXC or STLD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
(RS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 75), 1. 3% yield, +450. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RS: +450. 7%, ZEUS: +132. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ZEUS and RS and SSD and SXC and STLD?
These companies operate in different sectors (ZEUS (Basic Materials) and RS (Basic Materials) and SSD (Industrials) and SXC (Energy) and STLD (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ZEUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SSD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SXC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; STLD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.