ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
Marine Shipping
Market Cap$3.21B
5Y Perf.+120.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ZIM vs SPIR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SPIR
Spire Global, Inc.
Specialty Business Services
Market Cap$607.77B
5Y Perf.-77.5%
ZIM vs SPIR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ZIM | SPIR |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Specialty Business Services |
| Market Cap | $3.21B | $607.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.90B | $72M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $479M | $-25.02B |
| Gross Margin | 16.8% | 40.8% |
| Operating Margin | 12.3% | -121.4% |
| Forward P/E | 6.7x | 11.5x |
| Total Debt | $5.74B | $8.76B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.05B | $24.81B |
ZIM vs SPIR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
ZIM
SPIR
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZIM Integrated Ship… (ZIM) | 100 | 220.8 | +120.8% |
| Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) | 100 | 22.5 | -77.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZIM vs SPIR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: ZIM leads in 7 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
The Income Pick
ZIM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.27, yield 16.1%
- Rev growth -18.1%, EPS growth -77.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -18.1%
- 5.5% 10Y total return vs SPIR's -75.7%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
SPIR
Spire Global, Inc.
The Value Angle
In this particular matchup, SPIR is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
Best for: industrials exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ZIM | -18.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2% |
| Value | ZIM | Lower P/E (6.7x vs 11.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | ZIM | 6.9% margin vs SPIR's -349.6% |
| Stability / Safety | ZIM | Beta 1.27 vs SPIR's 3.10 |
| Dividends | ZIM | 16.1% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | ZIM | +100.7% vs SPIR's +93.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ZIM | 4.3% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC 7.3% vs -0.1% |
ZIM vs SPIR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2022
Segment breakdown not available.
ZIM vs SPIR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLZIMLAGGINGSPIR
SPIRSpire Global, Inc.
0leads
ZIMZIM Integrated Shippi…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SPIRMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
ZIM3/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ZIM5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
ZIM2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ZIM and SPIR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ZIM is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.9B annually — 96.5x SPIR's $72M. ZIM is the more profitable business, keeping 6.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, SPIR holds the edge at -26.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ZIMZIM Integrated Sh… | SPIRSpire Global, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.9B | $72M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.1B | -$74M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $479M | -$25.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.0B | -$16.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.8% | +40.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | -121.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.9% | -349.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.0% | -227.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.5% | -26.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -93.1% | +59.5% |
Evenly matched — ZIM and SPIR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
ZIM leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.7x trailing earnings, ZIM trades at a 42% valuation discount to SPIR's 11.5x P/E.
| Metric | ZIMZIM Integrated Sh… | SPIRSpire Global, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.2B | $607.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.9B | $591.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.69x | 11.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.70x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.46x | 8493.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.80x | 5.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.99x | — |
ZIM leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ZIM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ZIM delivers a 12.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-88 for SPIR. SPIR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ZIM's 1.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPIR scores 5/9 vs ZIM's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ZIMZIM Integrated Sh… | SPIRSpire Global, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.0% | -88.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.3% | -47.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.3% | -0.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.6% | -0.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.43x | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.7B | -$16.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $24.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.7B | $8.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.02x | 9.20x |
ZIM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ZIM and SPIR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ZIM five years ago would be worth $19,438 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,337 for SPIR. Over the past 12 months, ZIM leads with a +100.7% total return vs SPIR's +93.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SPIR at 50.7% vs ZIM's 27.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ZIMZIM Integrated Sh… | SPIRSpire Global, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.5% | +136.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +100.7% | +93.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +107.4% | +242.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +94.4% | -76.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +552.4% | -75.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.5% | +50.7% |
Evenly matched — ZIM and SPIR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ZIM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ZIM is the less volatile stock with a 1.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 3.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ZIM currently trades 88.8% from its 52-week high vs SPIR's 78.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ZIMZIM Integrated Sh… | SPIRSpire Global, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.27x | 3.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.97 | $23.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.33 | $6.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.8% | +78.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.7 | 47.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.8M | 1.6M |
ZIM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ZIM as "Hold" and SPIR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -6.7% upside for SPIR (target: $17) vs -44.4% for ZIM (target: $15). ZIM is the only dividend payer here at 16.08% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ZIMZIM Integrated Sh… | SPIRSpire Global, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.80 | $17.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +16.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.28 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
ZIM leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
Best OverallZIM Integrated Shipping Ser… (ZIM)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ZIM vs SPIR: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZIM or SPIR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
(ZIM) is the stronger pick with -18. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) offers the better valuation at 6. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ZIM or SPIR?
On trailing P/E, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
(ZIM) is the cheapest at 6. 7x versus Spire Global, Inc. at 11. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ZIM or SPIR?
Over the past 5 years, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
(ZIM) delivered a total return of +94. 4%, compared to -76. 6% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ZIM returned +552. 4% versus SPIR's -75. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ZIM or SPIR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
(ZIM) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 27β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 3. 10β — meaning SPIR is approximately 144% more volatile than ZIM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 143% for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ZIM or SPIR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
(ZIM) is pulling ahead at -18. 1% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to -77. 7% for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPIR leads at 0. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ZIM or SPIR?
Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus 6. 9% for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ZIM leads at 12. 2% versus -121. 4% for SPIR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPIR leads at 40. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — ZIM or SPIR?
In this comparison, ZIM (16.
1% yield) pays a dividend. SPIR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is ZIM or SPIR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
(ZIM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 27), 16. 1% yield, +552. 4% 10Y return). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 3. 10 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ZIM: +552. 4%, SPIR: -75. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ZIM and SPIR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
ZIM pays a dividend while SPIR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(ZIM: -31.5% · SPIR: -26.9%)P/E Ratio<
x
(ZIM: 6.7x · SPIR: 11.5x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.