Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ZJYL vs GKOS vs ATRC vs NVCR vs MDT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
ZJYL vs GKOS vs ATRC vs NVCR vs MDT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $344M | $7.85B | $1.41B | $1.92B | $99.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $43M | $551M | $552M | $674M | $35.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $-189M | $-5M | $-173M | $4.61B |
| Gross Margin | 35.8% | 78.1% | 75.5% | 75.2% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | 10.0% | -15.6% | -0.4% | -27.2% | 17.9% |
| Forward P/E | 93.6x | — | 428.7x | — | 13.8x |
| Total Debt | $12M | $140M | $88M | $290M | $28.52B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $91M | $167M | $103M | $2.22B |
ZJYL vs GKOS vs ATRC vs NVCR vs MDT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jin Medical Interna… (ZJYL) | 100 | 28.5 | -71.5% |
| Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) | 100 | 266.5 | +166.5% |
| AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC) | 100 | 63.4 | -36.6% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 29.7 | -70.3% |
| Medtronic plc (MDT) | 100 | 94.5 | -5.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZJYL vs GKOS vs ATRC vs NVCR vs MDT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ZJYL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 4.48 vs MDT's 35.17
GKOS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 32.3%, EPS growth -18.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.5%
- 457.1% 10Y total return vs ATRC's 95.1%
- 32.3% revenue growth vs MDT's 3.6%
- +52.0% vs ZJYL's -86.4%
ATRC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 17.9%, current ratio 3.96x
- Beta 1.03, current ratio 3.96x
Among these 5 stocks, NVCR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MDT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 36 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 3.6%
- Better valuation composite
- 13.0% margin vs GKOS's -34.3%
- Beta 0.47 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.3% revenue growth vs MDT's 3.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.0% margin vs GKOS's -34.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield; 36-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.0% vs ZJYL's -86.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 175.8% ROA vs GKOS's -20.1%, ROIC 6.0% vs -9.2% |
ZJYL vs GKOS vs ATRC vs NVCR vs MDT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ZJYL vs GKOS vs ATRC vs NVCR vs MDT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MDT leads in 2 of 6 categories
ZJYL leads 1 • GKOS leads 1 • ATRC leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MDT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MDT is the larger business by revenue, generating $35.5B annually — 826.1x ZJYL's $43M. MDT is the more profitable business, keeping 13.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GKOS's -34.3%. On growth, GKOS holds the edge at +41.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $43M | $551M | $552M | $674M | $35.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | -$40M | $13M | -$165M | $9.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | -$189M | -$5M | -$173M | $4.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$581,373 | -$18M | $54M | -$48M | $5.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.8% | +78.1% | +75.5% | +75.2% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | -15.6% | -0.4% | -27.2% | +17.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | -34.3% | -0.8% | -25.7% | +13.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.4% | -3.4% | +9.7% | -7.1% | +15.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.4% | +41.2% | +14.3% | +12.3% | +8.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -105.3% | -6.3% | +101.6% | -100.0% | -11.9% |
Valuation Metrics
MDT leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.6x trailing earnings, MDT trades at a 77% valuation discount to ZJYL's 93.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ZJYL offers better value at 4.48x vs MDT's 35.17x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $344M | $7.9B | $1.4B | $1.9B | $99.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $348M | $7.9B | $1.3B | $2.1B | $126.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 93.62x | -40.90x | -115.83x | -13.80x | 21.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 428.71x | — | 13.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.48x | — | — | — | 35.17x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 87.30x | — | 77.75x | — | 14.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 14.65x | 15.47x | 2.63x | 2.92x | 2.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 12.06x | 11.69x | 2.70x | 5.51x | 2.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 29.15x | — | 19.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ZJYL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ZJYL delivers a 16.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-51 for NVCR. ATRC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVCR's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MDT scores 6/9 vs ZJYL's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.9% | -26.5% | -1.0% | -50.8% | +9.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.7% | -20.1% | -0.7% | -16.5% | +175.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.3% | -9.2% | -0.6% | -16.4% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.8% | -10.3% | -0.6% | -28.9% | +7.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.41x | 0.21x | 0.18x | 0.85x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | $49M | -$79M | $187M | $26.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $91M | $167M | $103M | $2.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $140M | $88M | $290M | $28.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 20.63x | -18.69x | 0.47x | -96.80x | 9.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GKOS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GKOS five years ago would be worth $16,155 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, GKOS leads with a +52.0% total return vs ZJYL's -86.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GKOS at 31.7% vs NVCR's -37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -51.1% | +21.2% | -29.2% | +28.3% | -18.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -86.4% | +52.0% | -8.3% | +1.1% | -2.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.7% | +128.7% | -41.8% | -75.7% | -4.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.3% | +61.5% | -64.2% | -91.3% | -27.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.3% | +457.1% | +95.1% | +30.3% | +26.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -26.8% | +31.7% | -16.5% | -37.6% | -1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GKOS and MDT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MDT is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GKOS currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs ZJYL's 12.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.56x | 1.16x | 0.95x | 2.15x | 0.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.00 | $146.75 | $43.18 | $20.06 | $106.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.12 | $73.16 | $26.62 | $9.82 | $77.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +12.2% | +91.4% | +64.4% | +83.9% | +73.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.7 | 63.0 | 45.0 | 69.8 | 27.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 22K | 678K | 669K | 1.5M | 7.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GKOS as "Buy", ATRC as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", MDT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.0% upside for NVCR (target: $34) vs 9.3% for GKOS (target: $147). MDT is the only dividend payer here at 3.57% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $146.67 | $51.33 | $33.50 | $109.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 24 | 19 | 15 | 49 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 36 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $2.78 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.8% | 0.0% | +3.2% |
MDT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ZJYL leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
ZJYL vs GKOS vs ATRC vs NVCR vs MDT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZJYL or GKOS or ATRC or NVCR or MDT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) is the stronger pick with 32.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 6% for Medtronic plc (MDT). Medtronic plc (MDT) offers the better valuation at 21. 6x trailing P/E (13. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ZJYL or GKOS or ATRC or NVCR or MDT?
On trailing P/E, Medtronic plc (MDT) is the cheapest at 21.
6x versus Jin Medical International Ltd. at 93. 6x. On forward P/E, Medtronic plc is actually cheaper at 13. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ZJYL or GKOS or ATRC or NVCR or MDT?
Over the past 5 years, Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) delivered a total return of +61.
5%, compared to -91. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GKOS returned +454. 5% versus ZJYL's -73. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ZJYL or GKOS or ATRC or NVCR or MDT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Medtronic plc (MDT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
42β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 15β — meaning NVCR is approximately 406% more volatile than MDT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 85% for NovoCure Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ZJYL or GKOS or ATRC or NVCR or MDT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) is pulling ahead at 32.
3% versus 3. 6% for Medtronic plc (MDT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AtriCure, Inc. grew EPS 74. 7% year-over-year, compared to -18. 4% for Glaukos Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, GKOS leads at 21. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ZJYL or GKOS or ATRC or NVCR or MDT?
Jin Medical International Ltd.
(ZJYL) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 6% net margin versus -37. 0% for Glaukos Corporation — meaning it keeps 15. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MDT leads at 17. 8% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GKOS leads at 77. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ZJYL or GKOS or ATRC or NVCR or MDT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Medtronic plc (MDT) trades at 13.
8x forward P/E versus 428. 7x for AtriCure, Inc. — 414. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVCR: 99. 0% to $33. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — ZJYL or GKOS or ATRC or NVCR or MDT?
In this comparison, MDT (3.
6% yield) pays a dividend. ZJYL, GKOS, ATRC, NVCR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ZJYL or GKOS or ATRC or NVCR or MDT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Medtronic plc (MDT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
42), 3. 6% yield). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MDT: +24. 3%, NVCR: +38. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ZJYL and GKOS and ATRC and NVCR and MDT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ZJYL is a small-cap high-growth stock; GKOS is a small-cap high-growth stock; ATRC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MDT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. MDT pays a dividend while ZJYL, GKOS, ATRC, NVCR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.