Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ZJYL vs SYK vs ZBH vs MDT vs HOLX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Medical - Devices
Medical - Devices
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
ZJYL vs SYK vs ZBH vs MDT vs HOLX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $344M | $112.69B | $16.32B | $99.94B | $16.97B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $43M | $25.12B | $8.41B | $35.48B | $4.13B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $3.25B | $761M | $4.61B | $544M |
| Gross Margin | 35.8% | 63.5% | 70.0% | 61.9% | 52.8% |
| Operating Margin | 10.0% | 22.4% | 15.6% | 17.9% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | 93.6x | 19.6x | 9.8x | 14.1x | 17.2x |
| Total Debt | $12M | $14.86B | $7.52B | $28.52B | $2.63B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $4.01B | $592M | $2.22B | $1.96B |
ZJYL vs SYK vs ZBH vs MDT vs HOLX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jin Medical Interna… (ZJYL) | 100 | 29.5 | -70.5% |
| Stryker Corporation (SYK) | 100 | 103.1 | +3.1% |
| Zimmer Biomet Holdi… (ZBH) | 100 | 64.5 | -35.5% |
| Medtronic plc (MDT) | 100 | 96.7 | -3.3% |
| Hologic, Inc. (HOLX) | 100 | 93.7 | -6.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZJYL vs SYK vs ZBH vs MDT vs HOLX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ZJYL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.6%, EPS growth 18.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.2%
- 18.6% revenue growth vs HOLX's 1.7%
SYK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 187.1% 10Y total return vs HOLX's 124.3%
- PEG 1.32 vs MDT's 36.00
ZBH is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (9.8x vs 17.2x)
MDT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 36 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 3.6%
- 3.6% yield, 36-year raise streak, vs SYK's 1.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- 175.8% ROA vs ZBH's 3.3%, ROIC 6.0% vs 5.4%
HOLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.41, Low D/E 52.0%, current ratio 3.75x
- Beta 0.41, current ratio 3.75x
- 13.2% margin vs ZBH's 9.1%
- Beta 0.41 vs ZJYL's 1.57
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.6% revenue growth vs HOLX's 1.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.8x vs 17.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.2% margin vs ZBH's 9.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.41 vs ZJYL's 1.57 | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 36-year raise streak, vs SYK's 1.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.1% vs ZJYL's -86.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 175.8% ROA vs ZBH's 3.3%, ROIC 6.0% vs 5.4% |
ZJYL vs SYK vs ZBH vs MDT vs HOLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ZJYL vs SYK vs ZBH vs MDT vs HOLX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SYK leads in 2 of 6 categories
ZBH leads 1 • ZJYL leads 1 • HOLX leads 1 • MDT leads 1
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SYK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MDT is the larger business by revenue, generating $35.5B annually — 826.1x ZJYL's $43M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 13.2% (HOLX) to 9.1% (ZBH). On growth, SYK holds the edge at +11.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $43M | $25.1B | $8.4B | $35.5B | $4.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $6.3B | $2.3B | $9.4B | $974M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | $3.2B | $761M | $4.6B | $544M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$581,373 | $4.3B | $1.8B | $5.4B | $1000M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.8% | +63.5% | +70.0% | +61.9% | +52.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | +22.4% | +15.6% | +17.9% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | +12.9% | +9.1% | +13.0% | +13.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.4% | +17.1% | +21.8% | +15.2% | +24.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.4% | +11.4% | +9.3% | +8.8% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -105.3% | +56.0% | +34.1% | -11.9% | -9.2% |
Valuation Metrics
ZBH leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.6x trailing earnings, MDT trades at a 77% valuation discount to ZJYL's 93.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYK offers better value at 2.36x vs MDT's 36.00x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $344M | $112.7B | $16.3B | $99.9B | $17.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $348M | $123.5B | $23.3B | $126.2B | $17.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 93.62x | 35.03x | 23.48x | 21.60x | 30.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.62x | 9.83x | 14.13x | 17.21x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.48x | 2.36x | — | 36.00x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 87.30x | 20.31x | 9.47x | 14.32x | 17.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 14.65x | 4.49x | 1.98x | 2.98x | 4.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 12.06x | 5.02x | 1.30x | 2.08x | 3.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 26.31x | 11.09x | 19.28x | 18.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ZJYL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ZJYL delivers a 16.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $6 for ZBH. ZJYL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.41x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SYK's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HOLX scores 7/9 vs ZJYL's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.9% | +15.0% | +5.8% | +9.4% | +11.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.7% | +6.9% | +3.3% | +175.8% | +6.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.3% | +11.4% | +5.4% | +6.0% | +9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.8% | +13.0% | +6.9% | +7.5% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.41x | 0.66x | 0.59x | 0.59x | 0.52x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | $10.8B | $6.9B | $26.3B | $667M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $4.0B | $592M | $2.2B | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $14.9B | $7.5B | $28.5B | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 20.63x | 6.72x | 4.08x | 9.08x | 8.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SYK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SYK five years ago would be worth $12,152 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,767 for ZJYL. Over the past 12 months, HOLX leads with a +37.1% total return vs ZJYL's -86.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SYK at 1.8% vs ZJYL's -26.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -51.1% | -15.2% | -7.1% | -18.1% | +1.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -86.4% | -22.5% | -10.4% | -2.8% | +37.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.7% | +5.5% | -37.2% | -4.2% | -8.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.3% | +21.5% | -47.3% | -27.7% | +15.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.3% | +187.1% | -17.8% | +26.5% | +124.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -26.8% | +1.8% | -14.4% | -1.4% | -2.9% |
Risk & Volatility
HOLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ZJYL's 1.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HOLX currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs ZJYL's 12.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.57x | 0.55x | 0.65x | 0.47x | 0.41x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.00 | $404.87 | $108.29 | $106.33 | $76.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.12 | $289.91 | $79.83 | $77.16 | $52.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +12.2% | +72.7% | +77.0% | +73.3% | +100.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.7 | 24.3 | 34.3 | 27.3 | 69.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 22K | 2.1M | 2.2M | 7.8M | 10.0M |
Analyst Outlook
MDT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SYK as "Buy", ZBH as "Hold", MDT as "Buy", HOLX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 40.5% upside for MDT (target: $110) vs 3.9% for HOLX (target: $79). For income investors, MDT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.57% vs SYK's 1.14%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $403.69 | $97.90 | $109.50 | $79.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 50 | 42 | 49 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% | +1.1% | +3.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 34 | 0 | 36 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.36 | $0.96 | $2.78 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.0% | +3.2% | +4.4% |
SYK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). ZBH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
ZJYL vs SYK vs ZBH vs MDT vs HOLX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZJYL or SYK or ZBH or MDT or HOLX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Jin Medical International Ltd.
(ZJYL) is the stronger pick with 18. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 7% for Hologic, Inc. (HOLX). Medtronic plc (MDT) offers the better valuation at 21. 6x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Stryker Corporation (SYK) a "Buy" — based on 50 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ZJYL or SYK or ZBH or MDT or HOLX?
On trailing P/E, Medtronic plc (MDT) is the cheapest at 21.
6x versus Jin Medical International Ltd. at 93. 6x. On forward P/E, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Stryker Corporation wins at 1. 32x versus Medtronic plc's 36. 00x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ZJYL or SYK or ZBH or MDT or HOLX?
Over the past 5 years, Stryker Corporation (SYK) delivered a total return of +21.
5%, compared to -72. 3% for Jin Medical International Ltd. (ZJYL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SYK returned +187. 1% versus ZJYL's -72. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ZJYL or SYK or ZBH or MDT or HOLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hologic, Inc.
(HOLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 41β versus Jin Medical International Ltd. 's 1. 57β — meaning ZJYL is approximately 282% more volatile than HOLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Jin Medical International Ltd. (ZJYL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 41% versus 66% for Stryker Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ZJYL or SYK or ZBH or MDT or HOLX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Jin Medical International Ltd.
(ZJYL) is pulling ahead at 18. 6% versus 1. 7% for Hologic, Inc. (HOLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Medtronic plc grew EPS 30. 8% year-over-year, compared to -25. 0% for Hologic, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SYK leads at 10. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ZJYL or SYK or ZBH or MDT or HOLX?
Jin Medical International Ltd.
(ZJYL) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 6% net margin versus 8. 6% for Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SYK leads at 19. 5% versus 15. 5% for ZJYL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MDT leads at 65. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ZJYL or SYK or ZBH or MDT or HOLX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 32x versus Medtronic plc's 36. 00x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) trades at 9. 8x forward P/E versus 19. 6x for Stryker Corporation — 9. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MDT: 40. 5% to $109. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — ZJYL or SYK or ZBH or MDT or HOLX?
In this comparison, MDT (3.
6% yield), ZBH (1. 1% yield), SYK (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. ZJYL, HOLX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ZJYL or SYK or ZBH or MDT or HOLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
55), 1. 1% yield, +187. 1% 10Y return). Jin Medical International Ltd. (ZJYL) carries a higher beta of 1. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SYK: +187. 1%, ZJYL: -72. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ZJYL and SYK and ZBH and MDT and HOLX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ZJYL is a small-cap high-growth stock; SYK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ZBH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MDT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; HOLX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. SYK, ZBH, MDT pay a dividend while ZJYL, HOLX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.