Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ZKH vs SITE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Distribution
ZKH vs SITE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Industrial - Distribution |
| Market Cap | $490M | $5.54B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8.75B | $4.71B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-231M | $153M |
| Gross Margin | 16.9% | 34.9% |
| Operating Margin | -3.3% | 5.1% |
| Forward P/E | 8.9x | 27.9x |
| Total Debt | $549M | $980M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.42B | $191M |
ZKH vs SITE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZKH Group Limited (ZKH) | 100 | 18.4 | -81.6% |
| SiteOne Landscape S… (SITE) | 100 | 74.5 | -25.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZKH vs SITE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ZKH has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.56
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, Low D/E 17.7%, current ratio 1.85x
- Beta 0.56, current ratio 1.85x
SITE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.6%, EPS growth 24.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.4%
- 368.6% 10Y total return vs ZKH's -80.7%
- 3.6% revenue growth vs ZKH's 0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.6% revenue growth vs ZKH's 0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 27.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs ZKH's -2.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs SITE's 1.24, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.7% vs SITE's +5.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.6% ROA vs ZKH's -3.6%, ROIC 7.3% vs 9.8% |
ZKH vs SITE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ZKH vs SITE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SITE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ZKH is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.8B annually — 1.9x SITE's $4.7B. SITE is the more profitable business, keeping 3.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ZKH's -2.6%. On growth, SITE holds the edge at +0.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8.8B | $4.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$220M | $382M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$231M | $153M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $246M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.9% | +34.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.3% | +5.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +3.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | +5.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.7% | +0.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.5% | +1.6% |
Valuation Metrics
ZKH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ZKH's 6.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SITE's 16.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $490M | $5.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $361M | $6.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -12.41x | 37.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.88x | 27.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 8.94x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.97x | 16.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.38x | 1.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.08x | 3.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.84x | 22.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ZKH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SITE delivers a 9.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-8 for ZKH. ZKH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SITE's 0.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SITE scores 8/9 vs ZKH's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.6% | +9.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.6% | +4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.8% | +7.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.2% | +9.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 0.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$875M | $789M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.4B | $191M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $549M | $980M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -8.82x | 6.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SITE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SITE five years ago would be worth $6,157 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,929 for ZKH. Over the past 12 months, ZKH leads with a +8.7% total return vs SITE's +5.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SITE at -6.7% vs ZKH's -42.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.0% | -0.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.7% | +5.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.7% | -18.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.7% | -38.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.7% | +368.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -42.2% | -6.7% |
Risk & Volatility
ZKH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ZKH is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SITE's 1.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.55x | 1.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.90 | $168.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.20 | $112.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.7% | +74.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.9 | 36.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 140K | 689K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ZKH as "Buy" and SITE as "Buy".
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $162.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | +1.8% |
ZKH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SITE leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns).
ZKH vs SITE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZKH or SITE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
(SITE) is the stronger pick with 3. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 5% for ZKH Group Limited (ZKH). SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. (SITE) offers the better valuation at 37. 1x trailing P/E (27. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ZKH Group Limited (ZKH) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ZKH or SITE?
On forward P/E, ZKH Group Limited is actually cheaper at 8.
9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ZKH or SITE?
Over the past 5 years, SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
(SITE) delivered a total return of -38. 4%, compared to -80. 7% for ZKH Group Limited (ZKH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SITE returned +353. 7% versus ZKH's -80. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ZKH or SITE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ZKH Group Limited (ZKH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
55β versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. 's 1. 15β — meaning SITE is approximately 109% more volatile than ZKH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ZKH Group Limited (ZKH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 58% for SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ZKH or SITE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
(SITE) is pulling ahead at 3. 6% versus 0. 5% for ZKH Group Limited (ZKH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. grew EPS 24. 4% year-over-year, compared to 10. 9% for ZKH Group Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, SITE leads at 5. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ZKH or SITE?
SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
(SITE) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 2% net margin versus -3. 1% for ZKH Group Limited — meaning it keeps 3. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SITE leads at 5. 1% versus 3. 9% for ZKH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SITE leads at 34. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ZKH or SITE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ZKH Group Limited (ZKH) trades at 8.
9x forward P/E versus 27. 9x for SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. — 19. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — ZKH or SITE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ZKH or SITE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ZKH Group Limited (ZKH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
55)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ZKH: -80. 6%, SITE: +353. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ZKH and SITE?
These companies operate in different sectors (ZKH (Consumer Cyclical) and SITE (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.