Steel
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ZKIN vs CODA vs PESI vs IIIN vs NX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Waste Management
Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Construction
ZKIN vs CODA vs PESI vs IIIN vs NX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Steel | Aerospace & Defense | Waste Management | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Construction |
| Market Cap | $8M | $134M | $207M | $527M | $916M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $179M | $28M | $59M | $678M | $1.85B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $4M | $-18M | $48M | $-240M |
| Gross Margin | 5.9% | 66.3% | 4.1% | 15.0% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | -2.3% | 17.4% | -26.3% | 9.2% | -10.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.5x | — | 16.6x | 10.0x |
| Total Debt | $24M | $395K | $4M | $4M | $854M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $29M | $12M | $39M | $76M |
ZKIN vs CODA vs PESI vs IIIN vs NX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZK International Gr… (ZKIN) | 100 | 19.2 | -80.8% |
| Coda Octopus Group,… (CODA) | 100 | 212.5 | +112.5% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 199.8 | +99.8% |
| Insteel Industries,… (IIIN) | 100 | 153.8 | +53.8% |
| Quanex Building Pro… (NX) | 100 | 161.8 | +61.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZKIN vs CODA vs PESI vs IIIN vs NX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ZKIN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CODA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 8.4% 10Y total return vs PESI's 178.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 8.86x
- 14.8% margin vs PESI's -30.1%
- Beta 1.00 vs NX's 1.89, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, PESI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
IIIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.01, yield 4.1%
- PEG 1.01 vs CODA's 5.24
- Beta 1.01, yield 4.1%, current ratio 3.97x
- 4.1% yield, vs NX's 1.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
NX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 43.8%, EPS growth -7.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.6%
- 43.8% revenue growth vs ZKIN's -34.2%
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 43.8% revenue growth vs ZKIN's -34.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.8% margin vs PESI's -30.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.00 vs NX's 1.89, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, vs NX's 1.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +78.9% vs IIIN's -18.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.4% ROA vs PESI's -20.2%, ROIC 14.1% vs -21.7% |
ZKIN vs CODA vs PESI vs IIIN vs NX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ZKIN vs CODA vs PESI vs IIIN vs NX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CODA leads in 2 of 6 categories
IIIN leads 1 • ZKIN leads 0 • PESI leads 0 • NX leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CODA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NX is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 65.8x CODA's $28M. CODA is the more profitable business, keeping 14.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PESI's -30.1%. On growth, CODA holds the edge at +28.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $179M | $28M | $59M | $678M | $1.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $6M | -$14M | $81M | -$81M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $4M | -$18M | $48M | -$240M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $191,770 | $7M | -$14M | $439,000 | $95M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | +66.3% | +4.1% | +15.0% | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | +17.4% | -26.3% | +9.2% | -10.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | +14.8% | -30.1% | +7.0% | -13.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | +24.6% | -23.4% | +0.1% | +5.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -43.5% | +28.8% | -20.1% | +23.3% | +2.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -19.7% | +3.0% | -110.5% | +6.1% | +71.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ZKIN and IIIN and NX each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.9x trailing earnings, IIIN trades at a 60% valuation discount to CODA's 32.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IIIN offers better value at 0.78x vs CODA's 7.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8M | $134M | $207M | $527M | $916M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $28M | $106M | $200M | $492M | $1.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.07x | 32.16x | -14.89x | 12.92x | -3.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.45x | — | 16.60x | 9.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 7.51x | — | 0.78x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 17.85x | — | 6.76x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.12x | 5.05x | 3.36x | 0.81x | 0.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.33x | 2.30x | 4.11x | 1.43x | 1.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 42.93x | 22.20x | — | 27.81x | 8.96x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IIIN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IIIN delivers a 13.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-34 for PESI. CODA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NX's 1.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CODA scores 7/9 vs ZKIN's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -25.1% | +7.2% | -34.5% | +13.2% | -30.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.3% | +6.6% | -20.2% | +10.4% | -11.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.4% | +11.2% | -21.7% | +14.1% | -8.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.2% | +8.1% | -16.7% | +14.1% | -10.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.96x | 0.01x | 0.09x | 0.01x | 1.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $20M | -$28M | -$7M | -$35M | $778M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $29M | $12M | $39M | $76M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $24M | $394,932 | $4M | $4M | $854M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.31x | — | -42.14x | 1192.54x | -3.30x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CODA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CODA five years ago would be worth $14,969 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $380 for ZKIN. Over the past 12 months, CODA leads with a +78.9% total return vs IIIN's -18.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CODA at 10.4% vs ZKIN's -34.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.8% | +25.1% | -8.8% | -16.2% | +31.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +28.3% | +78.9% | +26.2% | -18.7% | +23.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.3% | +34.5% | +21.7% | +10.4% | +6.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.2% | +49.7% | +45.6% | -12.0% | -22.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.5% | +844.4% | +178.6% | +48.0% | +23.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -34.0% | +10.4% | +6.8% | +3.3% | +2.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ZKIN and NX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ZKIN is the less volatile stock with a -0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NX's 1.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NX currently trades 87.3% from its 52-week high vs ZKIN's 32.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.53x | 1.00x | 1.85x | 1.01x | 1.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.47 | $17.28 | $16.50 | $41.64 | $22.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.03 | $5.98 | $8.02 | $24.35 | $11.04 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +32.4% | +68.9% | +67.7% | +65.2% | +87.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.7 | 48.6 | 41.5 | 39.5 | 54.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12K | 256K | 164K | 211K | 458K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PESI and IIIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CODA as "Buy", PESI as "Hold", IIIN as "Buy", NX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 61.1% upside for PESI (target: $18) vs 17.6% for CODA (target: $14). For income investors, IIIN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.10% vs NX's 1.61%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $14.00 | $18.00 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 1 | 4 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +4.1% | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.11 | $0.32 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.4% | +3.5% |
CODA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). IIIN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
ZKIN vs CODA vs PESI vs IIIN vs NX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZKIN or CODA or PESI or IIIN or NX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) is the stronger pick with 43.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -34. 2% for ZK International Group Co. , Ltd. (ZKIN). Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN) offers the better valuation at 12. 9x trailing P/E (16. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ZKIN or CODA or PESI or IIIN or NX?
On trailing P/E, Insteel Industries, Inc.
(IIIN) is the cheapest at 12. 9x versus Coda Octopus Group, Inc. at 32. 2x. On forward P/E, Quanex Building Products Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Insteel Industries, Inc. wins at 1. 01x versus Coda Octopus Group, Inc. 's 5. 24x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ZKIN or CODA or PESI or IIIN or NX?
Over the past 5 years, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) delivered a total return of +49. 7%, compared to -96. 2% for ZK International Group Co. , Ltd. (ZKIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CODA returned +844. 4% versus ZKIN's -97. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ZKIN or CODA or PESI or IIIN or NX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ZK International Group Co.
, Ltd. (ZKIN) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 53β versus Quanex Building Products Corporation's 1. 89β — meaning NX is approximately -455% more volatile than ZKIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 118% for Quanex Building Products Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ZKIN or CODA or PESI or IIIN or NX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) is pulling ahead at 43.
8% versus -34. 2% for ZK International Group Co. , Ltd. (ZKIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Insteel Industries, Inc. grew EPS 112. 1% year-over-year, compared to -703. 3% for Quanex Building Products Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NX leads at 14. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ZKIN or CODA or PESI or IIIN or NX?
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus -22. 3% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CODA leads at 17. 1% versus -19. 0% for PESI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CODA leads at 66. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ZKIN or CODA or PESI or IIIN or NX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Insteel Industries, Inc. (IIIN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 01x versus Coda Octopus Group, Inc. 's 5. 24x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 22. 5x for Coda Octopus Group, Inc. — 12. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PESI: 61. 1% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ZKIN or CODA or PESI or IIIN or NX?
In this comparison, IIIN (4.
1% yield), NX (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. ZKIN, CODA, PESI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ZKIN or CODA or PESI or IIIN or NX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ZK International Group Co.
, Ltd. (ZKIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 53)). Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ZKIN: -97. 5%, PESI: +178. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ZKIN and CODA and PESI and IIIN and NX?
These companies operate in different sectors (ZKIN (Basic Materials) and CODA (Industrials) and PESI (Industrials) and IIIN (Industrials) and NX (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ZKIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CODA is a small-cap high-growth stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IIIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; NX is a small-cap high-growth stock. IIIN, NX pay a dividend while ZKIN, CODA, PESI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.