ZS vs NET

For growth investors, Cloudflare, Inc.

(NET) is the stronger pick with 29. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 23. 3% for Zscaler, Inc. (ZS). Analysts rate Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) a "Buy" — based on 52 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Cloudflare, Inc.

(NET) delivered a total return of +259. 9%, compared to -17. 0% for Zscaler, Inc. (ZS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NET returned +1328% versus ZS's +363. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Zscaler, Inc.

(ZS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 98β versus Cloudflare, Inc. 's 1. 53β — meaning NET is approximately 56% more volatile than ZS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Zscaler, Inc. (ZS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 100% versus 3% for Cloudflare, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cloudflare, Inc.

(NET) is pulling ahead at 29. 8% versus 23. 3% for Zscaler, Inc. (ZS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Zscaler, Inc. grew EPS 30. 8% year-over-year, compared to -26. 1% for Cloudflare, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ZS leads at 34. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Zscaler, Inc.

(ZS) is the more profitable company, earning -1. 6% net margin versus -4. 7% for Cloudflare, Inc. — meaning it keeps -1. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ZS leads at -4. 8% versus -9. 4% for NET. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZS leads at 76. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Zscaler, Inc.

(ZS) trades at 38. 1x forward P/E versus 228. 9x for Cloudflare, Inc. — 190. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ZS: 99. 7% to $277. 18.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Cloudflare, Inc.

(NET) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1328% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NET: +1328%, ZS: +363. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.