Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ZYBT vs ATXG vs CLPS vs TAOP vs CNET

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ZYBT
Zhengye Biotechnology Holding Limited

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic

HealthcareNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$45M
5Y Perf.-78.7%
ATXG
Addentax Group Corp.

Integrated Freight & Logistics

IndustrialsNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$3M
5Y Perf.-50.6%
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$25M
5Y Perf.-28.1%
TAOP
Taoping Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$1M
5Y Perf.-84.3%
CNET
ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.

Advertising Agencies

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.-58.8%

ZYBT vs ATXG vs CLPS vs TAOP vs CNET — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ZYBT logoZYBT
ATXG logoATXG
CLPS logoCLPS
TAOP logoTAOP
CNET logoCNET
IndustryDrug Manufacturers - Specialty & GenericIntegrated Freight & LogisticsInformation Technology ServicesSoftware - InfrastructureAdvertising Agencies
Market Cap$45M$3M$25M$1M$2M
Revenue (TTM)$186M$4M$299M$36M$6M
Net Income (TTM)$11M$-7M$-4M$-7M$-2M
Gross Margin49.0%14.7%22.8%14.9%4.8%
Operating Margin8.8%-49.4%-1.4%-15.7%-31.7%
Total Debt$86M$22M$34M$10M$122K
Cash & Equiv.$19M$325K$28M$2M$812K

ZYBT vs ATXG vs CLPS vs TAOP vs CNETLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ZYBT
ATXG
CLPS
TAOP
CNET
StockJan 25May 26Return
Zhengye Biotechnolo… (ZYBT)10021.3-78.7%
Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG)10049.4-50.6%
CLPS Incorporation (CLPS)10071.9-28.1%
Taoping Inc. (TAOP)10015.7-84.3%
ZW Data Action Tech… (CNET)10041.2-58.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ZYBT vs ATXG vs CLPS vs TAOP vs CNET

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CLPS leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. Zhengye Biotechnology Holding Limited is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. ATXG also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ZYBT
Zhengye Biotechnology Holding Limited
The Quality Compounder

ZYBT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 6.1% margin vs ATXG's -202.0%
  • 2.3% ROA vs TAOP's -21.7%, ROIC 3.0% vs -27.1%
Best for: quality and efficiency
ATXG
Addentax Group Corp.
The Value Play

ATXG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Better valuation composite
Best for: value
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
The Income Pick

CLPS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 14.6%
  • Rev growth 15.2%, EPS growth -181.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.7%
  • -78.5% 10Y total return vs ZYBT's -79.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 58.8%, current ratio 1.58x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
TAOP
Taoping Inc.
The Technology Pick

TAOP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
CNET
ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.
The Communication Services Pick

Among these 5 stocks, CNET doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: communication services exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCLPS logoCLPS15.2% revenue growth vs CNET's -49.5%
ValueATXG logoATXGBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsZYBT logoZYBT6.1% margin vs ATXG's -202.0%
Stability / SafetyCLPS logoCLPSBeta 0.27 vs TAOP's 2.30
DividendsCLPS logoCLPS14.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs ZYBT's 5.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)CLPS logoCLPS-5.4% vs ZYBT's -91.5%
Efficiency (ROA)ZYBT logoZYBT2.3% ROA vs TAOP's -21.7%, ROIC 3.0% vs -27.1%

ZYBT vs ATXG vs CLPS vs TAOP vs CNET — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ZYBTZhengye Biotechnology Holding Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

ATXGAddentax Group Corp.
FY 2024
Reportable Subsegments
100.0%$4M
CLPSCLPS Incorporation
FY 2025
Other Member
100.0%$894,598
TAOPTaoping Inc.
FY 2025
Product
75.0%$23M
Advertising
13.7%$4M
Revenue Project
5.8%$2M
Software
4.6%$1M
Product and Service, Other
0.8%$243,254
Service
0.2%$55,129
Other Related Parties
0.0%$3,805
CNETZW Data Action Technologies Inc.
FY 2024
Search Engine Marketing and Data Service
67.5%$10M
Online Advertising Placement
32.5%$5M

ZYBT vs ATXG vs CLPS vs TAOP vs CNET — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCLPSLAGGINGCNET

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ZYBT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

CLPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $299M annually — 80.7x ATXG's $4M. ZYBT is the more profitable business, keeping 6.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATXG's -2.0%. On growth, CLPS holds the edge at +15.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricZYBT logoZYBTZhengye Biotechno…ATXG logoATXGAddentax Group Co…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationTAOP logoTAOPTaoping Inc.CNET logoCNETZW Data Action Te…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$186M$4M$299M$36M$6M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$947,630-$1M-$4M-$2M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$7M-$4M-$7M-$2M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$1M$0-$3M-$2M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+49.0%+14.7%+22.8%+14.9%+4.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+8.8%-49.4%-1.4%-15.7%-31.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+6.1%-2.0%-1.3%-19.6%-33.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+7.1%-34.3%-2.3%-8.1%-27.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-7.9%+15.3%-2.6%-47.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-136.8%+75.8%-51.7%+95.7%
ZYBT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TAOP leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
MetricZYBT logoZYBTZhengye Biotechno…ATXG logoATXGAddentax Group Co…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationTAOP logoTAOPTaoping Inc.CNET logoCNETZW Data Action Te…
Market CapShares × price$45M$3M$25M$1M$2M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$55M$25M$31M$9M$1M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.38x-3.48x-0.16x-0.38x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.15x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.63x0.67x0.15x0.04x0.12x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.86x0.09x0.43x0.08x0.38x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF22.89x4.56x
TAOP leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ZYBT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

ZYBT delivers a 3.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-60 for CNET. CNET carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ATXG's 1.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ZYBT scores 5/9 vs TAOP's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricZYBT logoZYBTZhengye Biotechno…ATXG logoATXGAddentax Group Co…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationTAOP logoTAOPTaoping Inc.CNET logoCNETZW Data Action Te…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+3.3%-31.7%-6.1%-46.7%-60.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.3%-19.4%-3.2%-21.7%-21.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+3.0%-2.9%-7.9%-27.1%-64.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+4.7%-3.9%-9.8%-38.0%-73.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–954225
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.25x1.03x0.59x0.50x0.03x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$68M$22M$6M$8M-$690,000
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$19M$324,953$28M$2M$812,000
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$86M$22M$34M$10M$122,000
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense4.07x-3.67x-52.63x
ZYBT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CLPS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CLPS five years ago would be worth $3,073 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7 for TAOP. Over the past 12 months, CLPS leads with a -5.4% total return vs ZYBT's -91.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLPS at 0.2% vs TAOP's -80.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricZYBT logoZYBTZhengye Biotechno…ATXG logoATXGAddentax Group Co…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationTAOP logoTAOPTaoping Inc.CNET logoCNETZW Data Action Te…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-13.5%-13.9%-10.3%-6.8%-44.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-91.5%-53.4%-5.4%-78.3%-55.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-79.9%-95.9%+0.5%-99.3%-89.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-79.9%-99.6%-69.3%-99.9%-97.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-79.9%-99.9%-78.5%-99.9%-97.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-41.4%-65.4%+0.2%-80.9%-52.1%
CLPS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

CLPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TAOP's 2.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLPS currently trades 48.2% from its 52-week high vs TAOP's 6.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricZYBT logoZYBTZhengye Biotechno…ATXG logoATXGAddentax Group Co…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationTAOP logoTAOPTaoping Inc.CNET logoCNETZW Data Action Te…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.87x1.44x0.27x2.30x1.18x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$13.79$27.90$1.88$20.10$2.78
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.68$0.37$0.80$1.18$0.57
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+7.1%+17.5%+48.2%+6.4%+25.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.144.649.853.150.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded265K157K15K20K11K
CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

For income investors, CLPS offers the higher dividend yield at 14.60% vs ZYBT's 5.27%.

MetricZYBT logoZYBTZhengye Biotechno…ATXG logoATXGAddentax Group Co…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationTAOP logoTAOPTaoping Inc.CNET logoCNETZW Data Action Te…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target
# AnalystsCovering analysts
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+5.3%+14.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1310
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.35$0.13
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CLPS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). ZYBT leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency).

Best OverallCLPS Incorporation (CLPS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ZYBT vs ATXG vs CLPS vs TAOP vs CNET: Key Questions Answered

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ZYBT or ATXG or CLPS or TAOP or CNET a better buy right now?

For growth investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger pick with 15.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 5% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — ZYBT or ATXG or CLPS or TAOP or CNET?

Over the past 5 years, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) delivered a total return of -69.

3%, compared to -99. 9% for Taoping Inc. (TAOP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CLPS returned -78. 5% versus ATXG's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — ZYBT or ATXG or CLPS or TAOP or CNET?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

27β versus Taoping Inc. 's 2. 30β — meaning TAOP is approximately 746% more volatile than CLPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 103% for Addentax Group Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — ZYBT or ATXG or CLPS or TAOP or CNET?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is pulling ahead at 15.

2% versus -49. 5% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Addentax Group Corp. grew EPS -19. 7% year-over-year, compared to -1870. 0% for Taoping Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TAOP leads at 8. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — ZYBT or ATXG or CLPS or TAOP or CNET?

Zhengye Biotechnology Holding Limited (ZYBT) is the more profitable company, earning 6.

1% net margin versus -121. 8% for Addentax Group Corp. — meaning it keeps 6. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ZYBT leads at 8. 8% versus -43. 5% for ATXG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZYBT leads at 49. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Which pays a better dividend — ZYBT or ATXG or CLPS or TAOP or CNET?

In this comparison, CLPS (14.

6% yield), ZYBT (5. 3% yield) pay a dividend. ATXG, TAOP, CNET do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

07

Is ZYBT or ATXG or CLPS or TAOP or CNET better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

27), 14. 6% yield). Taoping Inc. (TAOP) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPS: -78. 5%, TAOP: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between ZYBT and ATXG and CLPS and TAOP and CNET?

These companies operate in different sectors (ZYBT (Healthcare) and ATXG (Industrials) and CLPS (Technology) and TAOP (Technology) and CNET (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ZYBT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ATXG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; TAOP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CNET is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ZYBT, CLPS pay a dividend while ATXG, TAOP, CNET do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ZYBT

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.1%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ATXG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLPS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TAOP

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CNET

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ZYBT and ATXG and CLPS and TAOP and CNET on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ZYBT: -12.0% · ATXG: -7.9%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.