Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ZYBT vs CLPS vs CODA vs ATXG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ZYBT
Zhengye Biotechnology Holding Limited

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic

HealthcareNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$45M
5Y Perf.-78.7%
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$25M
5Y Perf.-28.6%
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$134M
5Y Perf.+50.4%
ATXG
Addentax Group Corp.

Integrated Freight & Logistics

IndustrialsNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$3M
5Y Perf.-48.9%

ZYBT vs CLPS vs CODA vs ATXG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ZYBT logoZYBT
CLPS logoCLPS
CODA logoCODA
ATXG logoATXG
IndustryDrug Manufacturers - Specialty & GenericInformation Technology ServicesAerospace & DefenseIntegrated Freight & Logistics
Market Cap$45M$25M$134M$3M
Revenue (TTM)$186M$299M$28M$4M
Net Income (TTM)$11M$-4M$4M$-7M
Gross Margin49.0%22.8%66.3%14.7%
Operating Margin8.8%-1.4%17.4%-49.4%
Forward P/E22.8x
Total Debt$86M$34M$395K$22M
Cash & Equiv.$19M$28M$29M$325K

ZYBT vs CLPS vs CODA vs ATXGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ZYBT
CLPS
CODA
ATXG
StockJan 25May 26Return
Zhengye Biotechnolo… (ZYBT)10021.3-78.7%
CLPS Incorporation (CLPS)10071.4-28.6%
Coda Octopus Group,… (CODA)100150.4+50.4%
Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG)10051.1-48.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ZYBT vs CLPS vs CODA vs ATXG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CODA leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. CLPS Incorporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. ATXG also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ZYBT
Zhengye Biotechnology Holding Limited
The Income Angle

ZYBT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
The Income Pick

CLPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 14.6%
  • Beta 0.27, yield 14.6%, current ratio 1.58x
  • Beta 0.27 vs ZYBT's 1.87
  • 14.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs ZYBT's 5.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
The Growth Play

CODA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 30.7%, EPS growth 15.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.1%
  • 8.4% 10Y total return vs CLPS's -78.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 8.86x
  • 30.7% revenue growth vs ATXG's -18.9%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
ATXG
Addentax Group Corp.
The Value Play

ATXG is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Better valuation composite
Best for: value
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCODA logoCODA30.7% revenue growth vs ATXG's -18.9%
ValueATXG logoATXGBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsCODA logoCODA14.8% margin vs ATXG's -202.0%
Stability / SafetyCLPS logoCLPSBeta 0.27 vs ZYBT's 1.87
DividendsCLPS logoCLPS14.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs ZYBT's 5.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)CODA logoCODA+78.9% vs ZYBT's -91.5%
Efficiency (ROA)CODA logoCODA6.6% ROA vs ATXG's -19.4%, ROIC 11.2% vs -2.9%

ZYBT vs CLPS vs CODA vs ATXG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ZYBTZhengye Biotechnology Holding Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

CLPSCLPS Incorporation
FY 2025
Other Member
100.0%$894,598
CODACoda Octopus Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Equipment Sales
71.3%$14M
Service
17.3%$4M
Equipment Rentals
7.3%$1M
Software Sales
4.0%$811,912
ATXGAddentax Group Corp.
FY 2024
Reportable Subsegments
100.0%$4M

ZYBT vs CLPS vs CODA vs ATXG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCODALAGGINGATXG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CODA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

CLPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $299M annually — 80.7x ATXG's $4M. CODA is the more profitable business, keeping 14.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATXG's -2.0%. On growth, CODA holds the edge at +28.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricZYBT logoZYBTZhengye Biotechno…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…ATXG logoATXGAddentax Group Co…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$186M$299M$28M$4M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$1M$6M-$947,630
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$4M$4M-$7M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$0$7M-$1M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+49.0%+22.8%+66.3%+14.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+8.8%-1.4%+17.4%-49.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+6.1%-1.3%+14.8%-2.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+7.1%-2.3%+24.6%-34.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+15.3%+28.8%-7.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+75.8%+3.0%-136.8%
CODA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — CLPS and ATXG each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, ZYBT's 9.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CODA's 17.9x.

MetricZYBT logoZYBTZhengye Biotechno…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…ATXG logoATXGAddentax Group Co…
Market CapShares × price$45M$25M$134M$3M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$55M$31M$106M$25M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-3.48x32.16x-0.38x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.85x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate7.51x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.15x17.85x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.63x0.15x5.05x0.67x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.86x0.43x2.30x0.09x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF22.89x22.20x4.56x
Evenly matched — CLPS and ATXG each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CODA leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

CODA delivers a 7.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-32 for ATXG. CODA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ATXG's 1.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CODA scores 7/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricZYBT logoZYBTZhengye Biotechno…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…ATXG logoATXGAddentax Group Co…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+3.3%-6.1%+7.2%-31.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.3%-3.2%+6.6%-19.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+3.0%-7.9%+11.2%-2.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+4.7%-9.8%+8.1%-3.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95274
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.25x0.59x0.01x1.03x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$68M$6M-$28M$22M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$19M$28M$29M$324,953
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$86M$34M$394,932$22M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense4.07x-3.67x
CODA leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CODA five years ago would be worth $14,969 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $43 for ATXG. Over the past 12 months, CODA leads with a +78.9% total return vs ZYBT's -91.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CODA at 10.4% vs ATXG's -65.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricZYBT logoZYBTZhengye Biotechno…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…ATXG logoATXGAddentax Group Co…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-13.5%-10.3%+25.1%-13.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-91.5%-5.4%+78.9%-53.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-79.9%+0.5%+34.5%-95.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-79.9%-69.3%+49.7%-99.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-79.9%-78.5%+844.4%-99.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-41.4%+0.2%+10.4%-65.4%
CODA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CLPS and CODA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CLPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ZYBT's 1.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CODA currently trades 68.9% from its 52-week high vs ZYBT's 7.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricZYBT logoZYBTZhengye Biotechno…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…ATXG logoATXGAddentax Group Co…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.75x0.19x0.99x1.48x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$13.79$1.88$17.28$27.90
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.68$0.80$5.98$0.37
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+7.1%+48.2%+68.9%+17.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.149.848.644.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded265K15K256K157K
Evenly matched — CLPS and CODA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

For income investors, CLPS offers the higher dividend yield at 14.60% vs ZYBT's 5.27%.

MetricZYBT logoZYBTZhengye Biotechno…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…ATXG logoATXGAddentax Group Co…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$14.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+5.3%+14.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises130
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.35$0.13
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CODA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CLPS leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.

Best OverallCoda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ZYBT vs CLPS vs CODA vs ATXG: Key Questions Answered

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ZYBT or CLPS or CODA or ATXG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

(CODA) is the stronger pick with 30. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 9% for Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG). Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) offers the better valuation at 32. 2x trailing P/E (22. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — ZYBT or CLPS or CODA or ATXG?

Over the past 5 years, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

(CODA) delivered a total return of +49. 7%, compared to -99. 6% for Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CODA returned +861. 1% versus ATXG's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — ZYBT or CLPS or CODA or ATXG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

19β versus Zhengye Biotechnology Holding Limited's 1. 75β — meaning ZYBT is approximately 796% more volatile than CLPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 103% for Addentax Group Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — ZYBT or CLPS or CODA or ATXG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

(CODA) is pulling ahead at 30. 7% versus -18. 9% for Addentax Group Corp. (ATXG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Coda Octopus Group, Inc. grew EPS 15. 6% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CODA leads at 6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — ZYBT or CLPS or CODA or ATXG?

Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

(CODA) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus -121. 8% for Addentax Group Corp. — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CODA leads at 17. 1% versus -43. 5% for ATXG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CODA leads at 66. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Which pays a better dividend — ZYBT or CLPS or CODA or ATXG?

In this comparison, CLPS (14.

6% yield), ZYBT (5. 3% yield) pay a dividend. CODA, ATXG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

07

Is ZYBT or CLPS or CODA or ATXG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

19), 14. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPS: -78. 6%, ATXG: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between ZYBT and CLPS and CODA and ATXG?

These companies operate in different sectors (ZYBT (Healthcare) and CLPS (Technology) and CODA (Industrials) and ATXG (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ZYBT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CODA is a small-cap high-growth stock; ATXG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ZYBT, CLPS pay a dividend while CODA, ATXG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ZYBT

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.1%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLPS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CODA

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ATXG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ZYBT and CLPS and CODA and ATXG on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ZYBT: -12.0% · CLPS: 15.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.